• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Petition launched to demand re-opening of Dumfries-Stranraer railway line

Status
Not open for further replies.

och aye

Member
Joined
21 Jan 2012
Messages
865
http://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/news/l...demand-re-opening-8497201#MdfvVI23ShSm5Gut.97
A Dumfries man is demanding the re-opening of a Dumfries-Stranraer railway line.

Sandy Rogerson wants to see the 73-mile route brought back to life to improve trade links, boost tourism and reduce lorry traffic on the A75.

An online petition launched last week , gathered more than 500 signatures in three days and now has more than 800.

Sandy said: “It would increase public transport options, put Galloway back on the railway map, remove lorry traffic from the A75 and increase tourism in the region....
Not sure there is much traffic to justify re-opening this rather long stretch of railway, considering there is very little in the way of population.

If the Ferry service at Stranraer was still running, there might have been a (faint) justification to look at re-opening the line for freight to and from Northern Ireland.

If anyone would like to sign the petition, here's the link:

http://you.38degrees.org.uk/petitions/reopen-the-dumfries-stranraer-railway
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Tomnick

Established Member
Joined
10 Jun 2005
Messages
5,888
"The bus service is abysmal...there are huge gaps between journeys" - I'm sure that that doesn't indicate a substantial lack of demand though!
 

AndyW33

Member
Joined
12 Aug 2013
Messages
534
It might be more successful if the petition was addressed to the Scottish Government who are in charge of rail reopenings in Scotland, rather than Dumfries and Galloway Council, who aren't. However it won't be successful because the organiser has missed the point that the ferry services which generate lorry movements on the A75 leave from Cairnryan, not Stranraer, and has not proposed reinstating the rail connection into Cairnryan port.
Nor has he noticed that lorries can't be carried on trains within the UK loading gauge, so any goods which might be shifted from road to rail would need to travel in containers and make the journey within Northern Ireland and on the ferry on trailers, so a transhipment point in the Cairnryan/Stranraer area to move the containers between train and trailer is also needed.
 

47271

Established Member
Joined
28 Apr 2015
Messages
2,983
If the petition sponsor had read this thread first it may have dissauded them from their project.

http://www.railforums.co.uk/showthread.php?t=118081

There's more chance of the entire Waverley route getting reopened as a double track electrified main line. And I haven't written that to invite comment on that subject either please.
 

najaB

Veteran Member
Joined
28 Aug 2011
Messages
32,291
Location
Scotland
Not sure there is much traffic to justify re-opening this rather long stretch of railway, considering there is very little in the way of population.

If the Ferry service at Stranraer was still running, there might have been a (faint) justification to look at re-opening the line for freight to and from Northern Ireland.
There isn't. It would be a much better use of money to subsidise a larger ferry on Stenaline's Belfast-Heysham route.
 

me123

Established Member
Joined
9 Jul 2007
Messages
8,510
There is no justification. The A75 is a bad road and is a long journey but the absolute numbers of people who would use the rail line are minimal. If Stranraer struggles to justify a service to Glasgow, I doubt that a train to Dumfries will be any more viable.
 

Jonny

Established Member
Joined
10 Feb 2011
Messages
2,574
Do they think that the Scottish Government is made of money?

Oh wait... :roll:
 

Xenophon PCDGS

Veteran Member
Joined
17 Apr 2011
Messages
34,058
Location
A typical commuter-belt part of north-west England
Just looked back as far as I could with regards to the original railways that were instrumental in building the railway in that area about 150 years ago and in time-honoured fashion, railway stations were built to serve local goods and passenger traffic, small as some of these were.

From the west coast, eastwards, the Portpatrick Railway opened in 1861 and had 15 local stations as far as Castle Douglas.

From Castle Douglas, the Castle Douglas and Dumfries Railway opened slightly earlier in 1859 and had 8 local stations. That railway then met the earlier opened Glasgow, Dumfries and Carlisle Railway. A number of amalgamations then followed over the years and some running powers were later granted to other competing companies.

However the time period of the 1860's when these railways greatly improved travel access along that southern coastal part of south west Scotland and the current time period of 2016 are not really one and the same thing these days and the move of the ferry service port from Stranraer to Cairnryan was a subject covered in a thread on this website some time ago.
 

dk1

Veteran Member
Joined
2 Oct 2009
Messages
17,858
Location
East Anglia
Strikes me of a group of people without a clue who go down the pub & come up with what appears to be a great idea after 10 pints but amazingly still believe it's a runner the next day :roll:
 

Sandy R

Member
Joined
27 Jul 2016
Messages
85
This line would connect 2 towns with combined populations of 55,000+, the intermediate traffic is not the main reason for re-opening, Freight potential is significant, bearing in mind the predominantly single carriageway A75 and A77. A container siding on the main line just east of Stranraer would negate the need for the Cairnryan branch to be re-opened. The tiny amount of foot passengers on the P&O and Stena ferries does not justify reopening to Cairnryan for passengers. The tourist potential of a line through Galloway should not easily be dismissed.
 

MidnightFlyer

Veteran Member
Joined
16 May 2010
Messages
12,856
The A75 is a bad road and is a long journey ...

To be fair there has been an awful lot of investment on that road over the past few years though, and it is now actually rather bearable: all but two settlements are now bypassed and there are considerably more dual carriageway sections to allow for overtaking. I believe the bypass at Dunragit was the final piece of serious work and that was completed a couple of years ago.
 

Sandy R

Member
Joined
27 Jul 2016
Messages
85
"The bus service is abysmal...there are huge gaps between journeys" - I'm sure that that doesn't indicate a substantial lack of demand though!


There is a lack of demand because people can drive the journey in 1 1/2 hours, so who would want to sit on a bus for 2 1/4- 2 1/2 hours ?
The levels of car traffic on the road, discounting those driving to ferries, shows there is plenty of demand for a rail passenger service not relient on intermediate traffic, which would be low due to the relatively sparse population in between.
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
There is no justification. The A75 is a bad road and is a long journey but the absolute numbers of people who would use the rail line are minimal. If Stranraer struggles to justify a service to Glasgow, I doubt that a train to Dumfries will be any more viable.

Trains running to Dumfries , and on to Carlisle (as all trains through Dumfries do) , with that city's hourly 3 hour 20 minute service to London,or Newcastle ( as 4 services per day do) would be an attractive proposition to the 57 ,000 residents of Galloway, the vast majority of whom would be on, or within 3 miles of a station on this line. Stranraer to London in 5 hours 15 minutes-5 1/2 hours with one change at Carlisle is a far more attractive proposition than the slow, tortuous journey via Ayr to (and/or Kilmarnock) to Glasgow which takes at least 2 1/2 hours.
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
It might be more successful if the petition was addressed to the Scottish Government who are in charge of rail reopenings in Scotland, rather than Dumfries and Galloway Council, who aren't. However it won't be successful because the organiser has missed the point that the ferry services which generate lorry movements on the A75 leave from Cairnryan, not Stranraer, and has not proposed reinstating the rail connection into Cairnryan port.
Nor has he noticed that lorries can't be carried on trains within the UK loading gauge, so any goods which might be shifted from road to rail would need to travel in containers and make the journey within Northern Ireland and on the ferry on trailers, so a transhipment point in the Cairnryan/Stranraer area to move the containers between train and trailer is also needed.

Local support from Dumfries and Galloway Council/SWESTRANS should not be dismissed. After the initial petition ( which has now reached 1,050 signatures in just 10 days)a Scottish Government e-petition to Transport Scotland will be raised. There is already political support from the Scottish Green Party locally and other political support will be sought starting with 47 D&G councillors.
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
It might be more successful if the petition was addressed to the Scottish Government who are in charge of rail reopenings in Scotland, rather than Dumfries and Galloway Council, who aren't. However it won't be successful because the organiser has missed the point that the ferry services which generate lorry movements on the A75 leave from Cairnryan, not Stranraer, and has not proposed reinstating the rail connection into Cairnryan port.
Nor has he noticed that lorries can't be carried on trains within the UK loading gauge, so any goods which might be shifted from road to rail would need to travel in containers and make the journey within Northern Ireland and on the ferry on trailers, so a transhipment point in the Cairnryan/Stranraer area to move the containers between train and trailer is also needed.

Regarding the rail connection to Cairnryan, this would probably be unnecessary. If containers are being transhipped from train to lorry to then travel by ferry to Ireland, it's irrelevant whether this is done next door to the ferry or 5 miles from it. So a container siding terminal would/could be situated on the current Stranraer line at a point convenient for access to the A751 (A75/A77 link road) just east of Castle Kennedy where the A75 and old railway line are virtually adjacent to each other.
 

NSEFAN

Established Member
Joined
17 Jun 2007
Messages
3,513
Location
Southampton
Sandy R said:
Freight potential is significant, bearing in mind the predominantly single carriageway A75 and A77.
The only way you'll get the lorries off the road is by some kind of rolling highway. As much as I'd love this to take off in the UK, I doubt anyone would want to pay for the loading gauge upgrade to make it work in this country, and even if they did there's other freight corridors which would arguably be more deserving of such investment.
 

thenorthern

Established Member
Joined
27 May 2013
Messages
4,237
I don't think reopening in a good idea, the area has a very low population density and it would mean probably having less than an hourly service also the region is very car dependant so I can't see a train service making much of an impact.
 

me123

Established Member
Joined
9 Jul 2007
Messages
8,510
Stations would probably be at Stranraer (Pop 10851), Newton Stewart (pop 4092), (Pop Gatehouse of Fleet (Population unknown) and Castle Douglas (Pop 4174). Dumfries of course has a population just shy of 50,000.

The reality is the Dumfries is the major employment centre in the region and that demand would be overwhelmingly towards Dumfries from Galloway, rather than people from Dumfries going West. So your assertion of 55,000+ isn't really a fair assessment of the situation - most of the population is in Dumfries and has little reason to travel West.

To look at Altnabreac's Famous Rules
Altnabreac's 4 golden rules of a successful rail reopening:
Population of 10,000+
60 minutes (75 at a push) journey time of a major employment centre.
Extant or mainly unobstructed trackbed
Ability to extend an existing service so more terminal capacity is not required.

1) Only one settlement on the new route has population over 10,000 - Stranraer, which already struggles to maintain its service to Ayr and Glasgow. Dumfries does have almost 50,000 people but it is already linked by rail to Carlisle and Glasgow, which is where the demand from this station lies.
2) Journey time from end to end will be >60 minutes
3) I think it is mostly unperturbed track bed, although I think a few of the upgrades have used the old line.
4) You could extend a few Carlisle-Dumfries terminators, and capacity isn't a real issue on this rural line.

Frankly, it fails the most important rules for this type of line (1 and 2) and this paints a bleak picture. As nice as it would be to link the region with a line in this way, it simply isn't viable, nor is it a worthwhile use of public money.

As I've said, Stranraer really struggles to sustain a service to Glasgow. If it can't manage that, the prospects for a line to Dumfries and even on to Carlisle are dire.
 

HSTEd

Veteran Member
Joined
14 Jul 2011
Messages
18,634
The only way this route reopens is if an Irish Sea crossing gets built - at which point it would need to be a new higher speed alignment with an enormous loading gauge to support piggyback operatoins [I would, conservatively, design to the Channel Tunnel loading gauge, or slightly larger to enable future double stack operations]
 

ChiefPlanner

Established Member
Joined
6 Sep 2011
Messages
8,060
Location
Herts
Correct me if i am wrong - but there was a huge imbalance of trade on the Irish routes - mostly inwards to Eire and NI , mostly empty equipment and containers back......(OK - a good while ago when I was involved)

Such an imbalance is not going to help the "economics" IMHO....
 

Sandy R

Member
Joined
27 Jul 2016
Messages
85
I don't think reopening in a good idea, the area has a very low population density and it would mean probably having less than an hourly service also the region is very car dependant so I can't see a train service making much of an impact.

The region is car-dependent BECAUSE there is no train service !
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
Stations would probably be at Stranraer (Pop 10851), Newton Stewart (pop 4092), (Pop Gatehouse of Fleet (Population unknown) and Castle Douglas (Pop 4174). Dumfries of course has a population just shy of 50,000.

The reality is the Dumfries is the major employment centre in the region and that demand would be overwhelmingly towards Dumfries from Galloway, rather than people from Dumfries going West. So your assertion of 55,000+ isn't really a fair assessment of the situation - most of the population is in Dumfries and has little reason to travel West.

To look at Altnabreac's Famous Rules


1) Only one settlement on the new route has population over 10,000 - Stranraer, which already struggles to maintain its service to Ayr and Glasgow. Dumfries does have almost 50,000 people but it is already linked by rail to Carlisle and Glasgow, which is where the demand from this station lies.
2) Journey time from end to end will be >60 minutes
3) I think it is mostly unperturbed track bed, although I think a few of the upgrades have used the old line.
4) You could extend a few Carlisle-Dumfries terminators, and capacity isn't a real issue on this rural line.

Frankly, it fails the most important rules for this type of line (1 and 2) and this paints a bleak picture. As nice as it would be to link the region with a line in this way, it simply isn't viable, nor is it a worthwhile use of public money.

As I've said, Stranraer really struggles to sustain a service to Glasgow. If it can't manage that, the prospects for a line to Dumfries and even on to Carlisle are dire.


People would mainly be travelling east TO Dumfries for employment, links to other train services, ie Carlisle, Newcastle, London etc etc.
You've missed Dalbeattie, population 4,500. This line would link the 1st, 2nd, 4th, 5th, 6th and 7th biggest towns in the region, and all of those bar Stranraer would be less than an hour from Dumfries, in the case of Dalbeattie and Castle Douglas , less than an hour from Carlisle.
Combining freight potential,(Irish bound containers, local timber etc etc) through passenger traffic as well as local, and tourist train potential makes the line viable.
Dumfries and Galloway was voted top tourist destination in Scotland, the A75 corridor is the main export route between the north of Ireland , southern Scptland and Northern England. There is a lot going for this scheme.
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
Correct me if i am wrong - but there was a huge imbalance of trade on the Irish routes - mostly inwards to Eire and NI , mostly empty equipment and containers back......(OK - a good while ago when I was involved)

Such an imbalance is not going to help the "economics" IMHO....

I don't see that that makes any difference. There's a huge trade imbalance between the' UK' and China, it irrelevant.
'Britain is full of empty container trains in one direction.eg Inverness to Grangemouth Tesco service , as one example of many.
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
Stations would probably be at Stranraer (Pop 10851), Newton Stewart (pop 4092), (Pop Gatehouse of Fleet (Population unknown) and Castle Douglas (Pop 4174). Dumfries of course has a population just shy of 50,000.

The reality is the Dumfries is the major employment centre in the region and that demand would be overwhelmingly towards Dumfries from Galloway, rather than people from Dumfries going West. So your assertion of 55,000+ isn't really a fair assessment of the situation - most of the population is in Dumfries and has little reason to travel West.

To look at Altnabreac's Famous Rules


1) Only one settlement on the new route has population over 10,000 - Stranraer, which already struggles to maintain its service to Ayr and Glasgow. Dumfries does have almost 50,000 people but it is already linked by rail to Carlisle and Glasgow, which is where the demand from this station lies.
2) Journey time from end to end will be >60 minutes
3) I think it is mostly unperturbed track bed, although I think a few of the upgrades have used the old line.
4) You could extend a few Carlisle-Dumfries terminators, and capacity isn't a real issue on this rural line.

Frankly, it fails the most important rules for this type of line (1 and 2) and this paints a bleak picture. As nice as it would be to link the region with a line in this way, it simply isn't viable, nor is it a worthwhile use of public money.

As I've said, Stranraer really struggles to sustain a service to Glasgow. If it can't manage that, the prospects for a line to Dumfries and even on to Carlisle are dire.

As far as terminal capacity goes, Dumfries has a piecemeal odd-interval service to Carlisle at present (14 trains a day) so this also has the potential to increase the viability of an increase in service to Carlisle from Dumfries because the catchment area for the service would potentially have more than doubled.
 

gazthomas

Established Member
Joined
5 Jun 2011
Messages
3,120
Location
St. Albans
A daft idea. There are more worthy ways to spend money, especially in dealing with inequality and health issues
 

najaB

Veteran Member
Joined
28 Aug 2011
Messages
32,291
Location
Scotland
This line would link the 1st, 2nd, 4th, 5th, 6th and 7th biggest towns in the region, and all of those bar Stranraer would be less than an hour from Dumfries, in the case of Dalbeattie and Castle Douglas , less than an hour from Carlisle.
The 1st, 2nd, 4th, 5th, 6th and 7th biggest towns, yes, but you're still talking next to nobody overall. Certainly not worth spending the hundreds of millions it would take to reinstate this line. It would be cheaper to buy them each a car and pay someone to drive it for them.
Combining freight potential,(Irish bound containers, local timber etc etc) through passenger traffic as well as local, and tourist train potential makes the line viable.
If your intention is getting container traffic off the road, then subsidise Stennaline putting a larger ferry on the Belfast-Heysham route as it's already rail connected. Hell, even buying them a couple of new ferries would probably be cheaper.
 

Sandy R

Member
Joined
27 Jul 2016
Messages
85
The 1st, 2nd, 4th, 5th, 6th and 7th biggest towns, yes, but you're still talking next to nobody overall. Certainly not worth spending the hundreds of millions it would take to reinstate this line. It would be cheaper to buy them each a car and pay someone to drive it for them.
If your intention is getting container traffic off the road, then subsidise Stennaline putting a larger ferry on the Belfast-Heysham route as it's already rail connected. Hell, even buying them a couple of new ferries would probably be cheaper.

The Belfast-Heysham route doesn't serve Scotland.
 

47271

Established Member
Joined
28 Apr 2015
Messages
2,983
If we're going to blow a billion - because that's what it would be by the time it got going and delivered sometime in the 2030s - then I'm sure that we can all think of at least half a dozen Scottish reinstatements that would be a better spend of that than Dumfries-Stranraer.

I'm sorry, because I'm a great fan of the region and I think the route should never have been shut in the first place, not in any way the same thing as suggesting it should be reopened, but neither of those can bring this one up the list of priorities.
 

Sandy R

Member
Joined
27 Jul 2016
Messages
85
A daft idea. There are more worthy ways to spend money, especially in dealing with inequality and health issues

The money would come out of the transport budget, no intention to affect health issues.
And it links into transport poverty, inequality due to lack of access to services etc etc. People with access to motorways , frequent train services tend to be better off than those in rural areas with lack of access .
24% of the population of Dumfries and Galloway have no access to a car.
That's nearly 14,000 potential users of the line in Galloway alone,which would pass through , or very near to, all the towns in the area.
Not to mention freight traffic , tourist traffic etc.
 

najaB

Veteran Member
Joined
28 Aug 2011
Messages
32,291
Location
Scotland
The Belfast-Heysham route doesn't serve Scotland.
No, it doesn't. And a large proportion of the ferry traffic isn't headed for Scotland either.

Heysham, but for a 300m curve, has a rail connection to the WCML.
 

Sandy R

Member
Joined
27 Jul 2016
Messages
85
If we're going to blow a billion - because that's what it would be by the time it got going and delivered sometime in the 2030s - then I'm sure that we can all think of at least half a dozen Scottish reinstatements that would be a better spend of that than Dumfries-Stranraer.

I'm sorry, because I'm a great fan of the region and I think the route should never have been shut in the first place, not in any way the same thing as suggesting it should be reopened, but neither of those can bring this one up the list of priorities.

I agree there are other rail schemes in Scotland with priority, Leven, St Andrews, Fraserburgh etc.
But Glasgow had £682 million on 5 MILES of motorway (M74 extension), Edinburgh had £500 million for trams, the new Forth Crossing, Aberdeen getting the western peripheral route, Borders had £354 million railway, Highlands the £3 billion A9 upgrade etc.
Time D&g had a slice of the pie.
And comparing the price to the Borders line, the line would be around £550-600 million, not a billion.
 

najaB

Veteran Member
Joined
28 Aug 2011
Messages
32,291
Location
Scotland
And comparing the price to the Borders line, the line would be around £550-600 million, not a billion.
Much more of the Borders line trackbed was intact, the terrain was more favourable, the line is shorter and you're comparing 2010 pounds to 2020 pounds.
 

tbtc

Veteran Member
Joined
16 Dec 2008
Messages
17,884
Location
Reston City Centre
Glasgow had £682 million on 5 MILES of motorway (M74 extension), Edinburgh had £500 million for trams, the new Forth Crossing, Aberdeen getting the western peripheral route, Borders had £354 million railway, Highlands the £3 billion A9 upgrade etc.
Time D&g had a slice of the pie

Yes, these areas have had a lot of money spent on them, but in pretty much every case they've also got the population density/ the traffic volumes/ the congestion to justify that investment.

The "they've had silly money spent on them, so why can't we" argument does get used a lot on here - usually in terms of "a branchline to my favourite holiday destination in Cumbria/ Cornwall/ Anglesey would be a fraction of the cost of HS2"...

24% of the population of Dumfries and Galloway have no access to a car

How many of them are housebound/ in Old People's Homes etc?

How many of that 24% would be capable of getting to their nearest (re-opened) station?

The Belfast-Heysham route doesn't serve Scotland.

...and the A75 contains a lot of trucks that are of no economic benefit to Scotland - so putting a better ferry on a "Dumfries And Galloway Bypass" ferry route from Heysham to Northern Ireland would take a good chunk of freight off the A75.

You've missed Dalbeattie, population 4,500. This line would link the 1st, 2nd, 4th, 5th, 6th and 7th biggest towns in the region

Doesn't matter if they are all relatively tiny rural towns (borderline villages in some cases?)

Dumfries and Galloway was voted top tourist destination in Scotland

On what grounds?

Compared to visitor numbers at Edinburgh Castle? What's the main attraction in D&G (to compare numbers)?

Stranraer really struggles to sustain a service to Glasgow. If it can't manage that, the prospects for a line to Dumfries and even on to Carlisle are dire.

If Stranraer struggles to justify a service to Glasgow, I doubt that a train to Dumfries will be any more viable.

^This^

If there are DMUs to invest in Dumfries to Carlisle then great.

Dumfries to Kilmarnock/ Glasgow as a second priority. Stranraer to Ayr next - though a pretty weak market that could cope with a 153 most of the time.

Stranraer to Dumfries would be linking two towns that aren't close enough or big enough to justify many daily commuters (and as for the idea of people regularly doing Stranraer to London...)
 

47271

Established Member
Joined
28 Apr 2015
Messages
2,983
If I were looking for rail investment priorities for D&G, I'd focus on:

1. Beattock station, way overdue
2. Thornhill station
3. Ensuring the Nithsdale route gets electrified and Dumfries receives a fast service from Glasgow
4. A Stranraer-Cairnryan connection coupled with Girvan-Stranraer improvements
 

6Gman

Established Member
Joined
1 May 2012
Messages
8,796
Regarding the rail connection to Cairnryan, this would probably be unnecessary. If containers are being transhipped from train to lorry to then travel by ferry to Ireland, it's irrelevant whether this is done next door to the ferry or 5 miles from it. So a container siding terminal would/could be situated on the current Stranraer line at a point convenient for access to the A751 (A75/A77 link road) just east of Castle Kennedy where the A75 and old railway line are virtually adjacent to each other.

Holyhead used to have a freightliner terminal. Straight off the ship onto the train, off to London (or wherever).

It closed.

If an existing facility couldn't be viable how on earth would building one from scratch work?
 

Bevan Price

Established Member
Joined
22 Apr 2010
Messages
7,820
Stranraer to Dumfries was 73 miles of rail through three smallish towns and lots of sparsely populated countryside. Chances of reopening ? - much less than the chance of Scotland winning the Football World Cup in the next thousand years.

Out of interest, train service (steam, 1951) was 3 "most stations" trains each way, plus a handful of boat trains (some seasonal), and some short workings between Dumfries & Castle Douglas, the latter extending down the branch to Kirkcudbright.

Typical boat train journey times from Stranraer were:

Newton Stewart 41 mins.
Castle Douglas 1h. 40m.
Dalbeattie 1h. 51m.
Dumfries 2h. 20m.

Diesel operation might have cut overall journey times by 10 to 20 minutes - if the line was suitable for faster running.

I can think of other Scottish railways on which vast sums of money could be better spent reopening (e.g. the Perth - Forfar route)

.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top