• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Wales & Borders Franchise

Status
Not open for further replies.

gareth950

Member
Joined
3 Nov 2013
Messages
1,009
So seeing as the process of awarding the next W&B franchise continues to be held in a vacuum, all we can do is speculate. Reading an article from 17th February on subscription website www.transportxtra.com about Vivarail's hopes for the D-train despite the fire setback, Adrian Shooter says this to the reporter:

So where is Vivarail now in terms of prospects for sales of its trains? According to Shooter, still very much on track. “I’ve actually got a small order,” he says. “Then I think I’m three months away from my next order, which is contingent on a franchise bid. We’ve got a confidentially agreement, so we can’t announce anything, but we will do it along with bidders.”
Link to article https://www.transportxtra.com/publi...ish-about-d-train-demand-despite-fire-setback

Shooter also mentions the Looe branch line and the Heart of Wales line as being ideal lines for the D-train. So, what's the chances of at least one of these confidential, secret orders being for Wales? Makes sense given 1) the timing he mentions, 2) the cloak and dagger secrecy of the next Welsh franchise award process and 3) it might explain the inaction in Wales to modify any of ATWs existing DMUs ready for 2020.
Replacing Pacers with D-trains can make sense, but replacing perfectly good 150s with 40 year old D-trains doesn't. Plus there's the danger that D-trains in Wales could become Mark-II Pacers and used as an excuse to delay infrastructure improvements, namely electrification.
 
Last edited:
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

craigybagel

Established Member
Joined
25 Oct 2012
Messages
5,546
So seeing as the process of awarding the next W&B franchise continues to be held in a vacuum, all we can do is speculate. Reading an article from 17th February on subscription website www.transportxtra.com about Vivarail's hopes for the D-train despite the fire setback, Adrian Shooter says this to the reporter:


Link to article https://www.transportxtra.com/publi...ish-about-d-train-demand-despite-fire-setback

Shooter also mentions the Looe branch line and the Heart of Wales line as being ideal lines for the D-train. So, what's the chances of at least one of these confidential, secret orders being for Wales? Makes sense given 1) the timing he mentions, 2) the cloak and dagger secrecy of the next Welsh franchise award process and 3) it might explain the inaction in Wales to modify any of ATWs existing DMUs ready for 2020.
Replacing Pacers with D-trains can make sense, but replacing perfectly good 150s with 40 year old D-trains doesn't. Plus there's the danger that D-trains in Wales could become Mark-II Pacers and used as an excuse to delay infrastructure improvements, namely electrification.

I'm happy to be proved wrong - and personally I think D trains could be very good for ATW (although I think they'd be more suited to the Valley lines than the Heart of Wales for several different reasons) - but I just can't see the Welsh Assembly accepting them.
 

gareth950

Member
Joined
3 Nov 2013
Messages
1,009
I'm happy to be proved wrong - and personally I think D trains could be very good for ATW (although I think they'd be more suited to the Valley lines than the Heart of Wales for several different reasons) - but I just can't see the Welsh Assembly accepting them.

Why not? Because they will be seen as 40 year old London cast-offs?
Wales needs extra trains from somewhere to get the network past 2020, especially on the Valleys if Pacers are withdrawn by 2019.
 
Last edited:

craigybagel

Established Member
Joined
25 Oct 2012
Messages
5,546
Why not? Because they will be seen as 40 year old London cast-offs?

Exactly - and I can't see them getting around this fact. Never mind that they could be useful, and aren't much older than some of ATW's existing stock, I just can't see the WAG going for it - as much as I'd love them to.
 

notlob.divad

Established Member
Joined
19 Jan 2016
Messages
1,609
It as been mentioned that the Merseytravel are working with the Welsh government to see if D trains maybe used to double the frequency of the Atw Wrexham to Bidston line. Sorry don't have a source to hand.
 

northwichcat

Veteran Member
Joined
23 Jan 2009
Messages
32,692
Location
Northwich
So seeing as the process of awarding the next W&B franchise continues to be held in a vacuum, all we can do is speculate. Reading an article from 17th February on subscription website www.transportxtra.com about Vivarail's hopes for the D-train despite the fire setback, Adrian Shooter says this to the reporter:


Link to article https://www.transportxtra.com/publi...ish-about-d-train-demand-despite-fire-setback

Shooter also mentions the Looe branch line and the Heart of Wales line as being ideal lines for the D-train. So, what's the chances of at least one of these confidential, secret orders being for Wales? Makes sense given 1) the timing he mentions, 2) the cloak and dagger secrecy of the next Welsh franchise award process and 3) it might explain the inaction in Wales to modify any of ATWs existing DMUs ready for 2020.
Replacing Pacers with D-trains can make sense, but replacing perfectly good 150s with 40 year old D-trains doesn't. Plus there's the danger that D-trains in Wales could become Mark-II Pacers and used as an excuse to delay infrastructure improvements, namely electrification.

Is he counting the LM franchise taking on one to trial as an order or does he mean either LM taking on a multiple trains or a small order for a franchise (other than LM) and a larger order for a franchise (other than LM)?
 

northwichcat

Veteran Member
Joined
23 Jan 2009
Messages
32,692
Location
Northwich
It as been mentioned that the Merseytravel are working with the Welsh government to see if D trains maybe used to double the frequency of the Atw Wrexham to Bidston line. Sorry don't have a source to hand.

Merseytravel are also looking for a solution for Liverpool to Chester and beyond services. Maybe a solution could be to free up Sprinters from Conwy and Borderlands to extend the Wrexham to Chester service to Liverpool?
 

anthony263

Established Member
Joined
19 Aug 2008
Messages
6,762
Location
South Wales
I can see the WG going for the D trains for the core valley lines especially if they can pass them off as although london cast off's they will provide much needed extra capacity and allow the valleys to say goodbye to the pacers.

I also have a feeling we will see some of the class 319 flex units appear in wales at some point.

I don't think the public are too concerned about the use of the d trains if they provide good reliable service and extra capacity. As for the 150's I doubt we will be saying goodbye to these as they will be needed on other routes which I don't think the D trains are suited for
 

Gareth Marston

Established Member
Joined
26 Jun 2010
Messages
6,231
Location
Newtown Montgomeryshire
Viva rail need a successful trial before anyone touches them with a barge pole. And that isn't happening soon.

The bidders are still engaging with stakeholders my local RUG has Arriva coming to their April meeting. Though I think this is a mandatory requirement in the bid. Revenue growth has to be key to any bid and where this has been growing is largely away from within Wales. Chester to Manchester, Cambrian mainline, Shrewsbury to Birmingham and Cardiff to Manchester.

DFT has added extra completion between Chester and Manchester and Shrewsbury and Birmingham though. The Marches remains the obvious choice with best prospects. At least one bidder is suppose to be thinking Stadler bi mode in theory its under wires Swansea to Newport and Gresty Lane to Piccadily......
 

coppercapped

Established Member
Joined
13 Sep 2015
Messages
3,218
Location
Reading
Plus there's the danger that D-trains in Wales could become Mark-II Pacers and used as an excuse to delay infrastructure improvements, namely electrification.

This is a classic example of the best being the enemy of the good.

(Under the current installation rate and the cost of electrification one is looking at electrification in Wales as being at least a decade away. At the present Wales receives a large subsidy/passenger-km so why not first try to build passenger numbers with a more frequent and possibly faster service using D-trains and improve the financial figures? There will then be a better chance of convincing the purse-holders of the benefits of electrification.)
 

HH

Established Member
Joined
31 Jul 2009
Messages
4,505
Location
Essex
So where is Vivarail now in terms of prospects for sales of its trains? According to Shooter, still very much on track. “I’ve actually got a small order,” he says. “Then I think I’m three months away from my next order, which is contingent on a franchise bid. We’ve got a confidentially agreement, so we can’t announce anything, but we will do it along with bidders.”

You'll have to pardon me if I eat this BS with a large pinch of salt. It's always possible that one of the W&B bidders will look at the D Train, but there has been a marked lack of enthusiasm for them from bidders so far. And an even greater lack of enthusiasm for them from the DfT; I wouldn't put them in my bid if I wanted to win.
 

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
105,096
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
DFT has added extra completion between Chester and Manchester and Shrewsbury and Birmingham though. The Marches remains the obvious choice with best prospects. At least one bidder is suppose to be thinking Stadler bi mode in theory its under wires Swansea to Newport and Gresty Lane to Piccadily......

That seems on the face of it to be quite a short section of wires making bi-mode a bit pointless. But if Stadler use electric transmission on the FLIRT anyway (and I think they do), the only additional costs are of a pantograph and transformer, so maybe it's worth having it anyway for future-proofing? Once there are enough wires, remove the generator module, and you have a simple EMU.
 

anthony263

Established Member
Joined
19 Aug 2008
Messages
6,762
Location
South Wales
FLIRTS for the wales & borders franchise makes good sense especially if it allows for the continuation of the west wales - Cardiff - Manchester service which is a very useful crosscountry route and very popular.

With them being ordered for Greater Anglia tagging additional units onto the existing order would be good and it releases the class 158/175's to be used elsewhere such as improving services along the north wales coast.

Some units would also be ideal for other routes such as Maesteg - Cheltenham which will use the wires for most of the length eg Maesteg - Severn Tunnel Jct
 

Gareth Marston

Established Member
Joined
26 Jun 2010
Messages
6,231
Location
Newtown Montgomeryshire
That seems on the face of it to be quite a short section of wires making bi-mode a bit pointless. But if Stadler use electric transmission on the FLIRT anyway (and I think they do), the only additional costs are of a pantograph and transformer, so maybe it's worth having it anyway for future-proofing? Once there are enough wires, remove the generator module, and you have a simple EMU.

There's a good 50 miles Swansea to Newport and nearly 30 Gresty Lane to Piccadily.
 

Envoy

Established Member
Joined
29 Aug 2014
Messages
2,837
With 80 miles under the wires for the west Wales to Manchester’s - I would have thought it well worth ordering bi-mode trains. (The Marches Line between Newport and Abergavenny may also get eventually wired). I see that the Stadler trains have Jacob’s bogies - a common bogie between 2 coaches. How do they remove a damaged coach from a set with such bogies?

PS> The Maesteg's to Cheltenham’s could surely become an all electric service from Maesteg to Ebbw Vale very 30 minutes?
 

DelW

Established Member
Joined
15 Jan 2015
Messages
4,842
Exactly - and I can't see them getting around this fact. Never mind that they could be useful, and aren't much older than some of ATW's existing stock, I just can't see the WAG going for it - as much as I'd love them to.

The Isle of Wight accepted 50 year old "London cast-offs" in 1989 and they're still providing the service nearly another 30 years later. They even attract some enthusiast traffic to the island.

Although there are concerns over the future of the line in the next franchise.
 

CardiffKid

On Moderation
Joined
13 Feb 2011
Messages
1,080
Location
Cardiff
The Isle of Wight accepted 50 year old "London cast-offs" in 1989 and they're still providing the service nearly another 30 years later. They even attract some enthusiast traffic to the island.

Although there are concerns over the future of the line in the next franchise.

But Carwyn Jones (Welsh First Minister) has said on numerous occasions "We don't want 40 year old trains"
 

daikilo

Established Member
Joined
2 Feb 2010
Messages
1,623
Interesting survey, but does ATW really operate trains from Crewe to Birmingham via Stafford (map on page 2 of the survey)?
 

LNW-GW Joint

Veteran Member
Joined
22 Feb 2011
Messages
21,130
Location
Mold, Clwyd
Interesting survey, but does ATW really operate trains from Crewe to Birmingham via Stafford (map on page 2 of the survey)?

Yes, one a day each way to/from Chester (early/late positioning moves).
VT also run one a day each way to/from Bangor/Holyhead, also early/late.
 

313103

Established Member
Joined
13 May 2006
Messages
1,595
Things could well be afoot within ATW as MD Ian Bullock is leaving his post. So at a time when a steady leadership is required it would appear that Mr Bullock is not the person taking ATW forward.
 

craigybagel

Established Member
Joined
25 Oct 2012
Messages
5,546
The Isle of Wight accepted 50 year old "London cast-offs" in 1989 and they're still providing the service nearly another 30 years later. They even attract some enthusiast traffic to the island.

I can see the WG going for the D trains for the core valley lines especially if they can pass them off as although london cast off's they will provide much needed extra capacity and allow the valleys to say goodbye to the pacers.

I also have a feeling we will see some of the class 319 flex units appear in wales at some point.

I don't think the public are too concerned about the use of the d trains if they provide good reliable service and extra capacity. As for the 150's I doubt we will be saying goodbye to these as they will be needed on other routes which I don't think the D trains are suited for

Yes the trains could do a great job, yes they are desperately needed, and yes there are older trains in use in other places. However.....

But Carwyn Jones (Welsh First Minister) has said on numerous occasions "We don't want 40 year old trains"

Bingo. It would take a massive change of heart for the WAG to come around to the idea, and I struggle to see that happening.

Yes, one a day each way to/from Chester (early/late positioning moves).
VT also run one a day each way to/from Bangor/Holyhead, also early/late.

Also maintain diversionary route knowledge

And most importantly of all, ferry lots of traincrew in to work!. But yes it is the only booked work both over Stafford and around Bescot for both Crewe guards (Chester on a Sunday) and Chester drivers. In an ideal world the Holyhead-Birmingham service would still run this way as we once the case since it's a lot quicker but sadly this is all that is left of it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top