Harpers Tate
Established Member
- Joined
- 10 May 2013
- Messages
- 1,705
I've made this observation before.
I have no issue, in principle, with buy-before-you-board, else "penalty" (of some sort). Where I take issue is where such a rule is applied without FIRST making more than adequate provision for customers to do what is required of them. That means redundancy of ticket issuing such that there are never excessive queue times. It means that where access to any given platform can be made directly, it is not sufficient to expect a customer to visit a more distant platform or location away from their entrance and then return where crossing tracks by bridge or (worse) level crossing) is needed. And so on. Take away all the reasnable excuses and then (and only then) start penalising.
I have no issue, in principle, with buy-before-you-board, else "penalty" (of some sort). Where I take issue is where such a rule is applied without FIRST making more than adequate provision for customers to do what is required of them. That means redundancy of ticket issuing such that there are never excessive queue times. It means that where access to any given platform can be made directly, it is not sufficient to expect a customer to visit a more distant platform or location away from their entrance and then return where crossing tracks by bridge or (worse) level crossing) is needed. And so on. Take away all the reasnable excuses and then (and only then) start penalising.