class387
Established Member
- Joined
- 9 Oct 2015
- Messages
- 1,525
717007 on HE53, don't know the other one.Any idea what units are on which diagrams today?
717007 on HE53, don't know the other one.Any idea what units are on which diagrams today?
A lot of subjective opinion as normal. Most of which we will never agree on. Still waiting to see you post some facts that the 7xx series are more reliable then the the 313s. Rather than saying that they will improve (but not when). I will note the 707s are not looking bad but the 700s continues to disappoint. The 700 must be the benchmark for the 717s as they are dual voltage.Wifi is a must on all services those days,
Apparently it’s a “trial” but it’s been working since last week. My dad has also been using it everyday and hasn’t had any issues.Oyster now up and running at HFN? I heard Mid March, then delayed until Early April (still says that on Tfl website)
A lot of subjective opinion as normal. Most of which we will never agree on. Still waiting to see you post some facts that the 7xx series are more reliable then the the 313s. Rather than saying that they will improve (but not when). I will note the 707s are not looking bad but the 700s continues to disappoint. The 700 must be the benchmark for the 717s as they are dual voltage.
For me reliablity and comfort are most important for me. I find the 7xx offer neither. Although I will respect the fact some people find them comfortable I don’t. The lack of grab rails is poor as an example.
However interested by your last point? Why? Most people I see are using mobile phones. They have 4G, which I also use on IC services for my laptop. Why must trains have WiFi? Surely a reliable train is more important than WiFi.
Same thing happened last week, can't remember which day but a few people didn't seem too happy about it.On the 1725 Mog to Gdh, at Moorgate, the PIS said "welcome aboard this service to Welwyn Garden City" and about half the train got off, before the driver changed it to what route it was actually doing.
Another Carriage Working will be converted over to 717's from next week. - Details remain sketchy at present, but as I see which C/W, I'll post the timings if someone else doesn't do so before me.
How often do single unit 313's still operate? Haven't seen / been on one in years and I use the line dailyIs a service diagrammed as 3 car. I passed a 3 car set yesterday evening going south at Hornsey circa 1820
Not sure if it was short formed or diagrammed. Bet it was cosy heading North.
I see people mentioning it and likely to convert early. But didn’t know if it was actually diagramed or a regular to short form if problems happen.
How often do single unit 313's still operate? Haven't seen / been on one in years and I use the line daily
How often do single unit 313's still operate? Haven't seen / been on one in years and I use the line daily
Does the PIS make the pointless ' change here for other national rail services' announcement?
On a 700 often the announcer breaks up or cuts out or plays at different intervals depending on coach
I should know what Hatfield House is lolYes. Along with alight here for Hatfield house etc..
Is a service diagrammed as 3 car. I passed a 3 car set yesterday evening going south at Hornsey circa 1820
Not sure if it was short formed or diagrammed. Bet it was cosy heading North.
I see people mentioning it and likely to convert early. But didn’t know if it was actually diagramed or a regular to short form if problems happen.
Yes it’s diagrammed in the morning peak, then spends the day in hornsey before coming out and starting service at Finsbury Park into Moorgate - 16:20 Stevenage via Hertford North, 17:30 Moorgate Via Hertford
18:45 Welwyn Garden city, where it stables in the yard to work the 06:24 into moorgate the following morning.
By putting my speculation hat on, I’m under the impression the company will convert Carriage workings which start and finish at Hornsey.
It’s a shame they can’t bolster that 3 car diagram but prior to the 717’s there haven’t been enough 313’s
Thanks. I suspect that was the one I passed yesterday. It was possible I was on the 1845 Moorgate to WGC when I thought it was short formed. Cosy
I guess as other diagrams change to 717s a 313 could strengthen it as well.
Its little things like that make the outfit seem so unprofessionalI should know what Hatfield House is lol
On a 700 the announcement at Horsham advising to change for Dorking etc is optimistic at 00:00
Is it that the 700s are inherently unreliable, or is it the timetable, since trains started going through the core, that is unreliable? If these same services were still able to be operated using other stock, wouldn’t delays south of the river still impact on post-core GN services, irregardless of rolling stock?For me reliablity and comfort are most important for me. I find the 7xx offer neither. Although I will respect the fact some people find them comfortable I don’t. The lack of grab rails is poor as an example.
train is more important than WiFi.
I once said I felt seat back tables are a must on all new trains. Something all passengers can use or take advantage of. The response was. “The 313s didn’t have them”. Wonder why things that people don’t need such as WiFi are viewed more important than things people do. Tables (fitted on regional railways and IC trains since the 1980s)
The trains. Managing about 14k minutes per technical incident. But at least they are improving very slowly.Is it that the 700s are inherently unreliable, or is it the timetable, since trains started going through the core, that is unreliable? If these same services were still able to be operated using other stock, wouldn’t delays south of the river still impact on post-core GN services, irregardless of rolling stock?
The trains. Managing about 14k minutes per technical incident. But at least they are improving very slowly.
The core doesn’t help but the higher failure rate of the trains compared to the 365 / 321 / 317s they replaced is noticeable.
Things are better at WGC but I find it hard to believe this is all the drivers fault. If it was Siemens and GTR would be shouting this from the roof-tops to ensure mud didn’t stick to the train. That recent failure in the core sounded to me train rather than driver related where it took 30 mins to move the train.I still think a lot of problems with the 700s have been down to issues with the doors and other factors that can be attributed to the driver and not the train itself. Once a new driver gets used to the foibles (as TL drivers did) then things improve drastically.
How long since the doors didn't open (even leaving to train failures) at WGC in a morning, which turned out to be the signaller not setting up the service properly so the driver can't set up the radio, and consequently can't (easily) operate the doors?
Things are better at WGC but I find it hard to believe this is all the drivers fault. If it was Siemens and GTR would be shouting this from the roof-tops to ensure mud didn’t stick to the train. That recent failure in the core sounded to me train rather than driver related where it took 30 mins to move the train.
Still get at lot of failures on route, ones at Welwyn North are particularly noticeable for obvious reasons.
But very scary with the 717s if the drivers not knowing the trains will cause a total service collapse. Glad they are introducing them slowly. I do appreciate the 313s are simple beasts. I doubt they can do much that a driver hasn’t seen before.
I am not sure Siemens post much about things like that, or if anyone would read such a feed if there was a social media feed from one of their depots. Plus they may have a contract that says they aren't to publish such information directly.
At the end of a day, a failed or delayed train is a failed or delayed train.
I think that it is 14k miles per technical incident. Given each 700 would do about 700 miles a day (say Bedford to Brighton and back x3) this would result in a technical incident per train on average every 20 days, or once every 3 weeks.
Is this right?
This is of course true. But surely it is in Siemen’s interest to contest these things as if it is always the drivers fault the train may have a more respectable MTIN figure. The current one is appalling and the allegation that it is all down to drivers incompetence (not my suggestion) they could have a 50k MTIN and be winning gold spammers.
It could cost them sales. But the alternatives are not covering themselves in glory and they are the best of a bad bunch.
I personally don’t think it is all the drivers fault. But that is just a GTR reason to shift the focus away from a poorly designed train.
I had one once between Moorgate and WGC in last few months. But this was down to a set failure. I am not sure. Just may have misunderstood some of the posts on this thread but I think a single diagram may exist. Haven’t seen one on a weekday myself for ages until yesterday.