• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Expansions for Scotland's rail network proposed

Status
Not open for further replies.

najaB

Veteran Member
Joined
28 Aug 2011
Messages
30,784
Location
Scotland
The only thing that has changed in the last 79 years has been introduction of jet fan engines.
At the macro level, that proposition just about holds water. But the geared turbofan of 2015 bears virtually no resemblance to a 1960s turbojet other than they both turn fuel into thrust.
There is no fossil fuel substitute for the jet engine and batteries would not sustain transcontinental flights of prop propelled aircraft even if the whole aircraft was a battery.
If you mean that there's no non-liquid fuelled alternative then again, I just about agree with you. But there's no reason why that liquid needs to be a hydrocarbon, and even less reason why it has to be from fossil fuel.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

gghdeo

Member
Joined
21 Jan 2019
Messages
20
If you believe that you will believe anything. The only thing that has changed in the last 79 years has been introduction of jet fan engines.
There is no fossil fuel substitute for the jet engine and batteries would not sustain transcontinental flights of prop propelled aircraft even if the whole aircraft was a battery. It would be too heavy to lift off anyway. Ah, I forgot. Chicken Run aircraft would do it.

Battery tech has been slow at improving, but it too will evolve. Today we can only power small planes for short flights. But 30 years, as an arbitrary time period, is a very long time in tech. I wouldn't be throwing my arms up in the air claiming "it's not possible". Where there's a need, and a profit to be made, progress isn't far behind. Let's wait and see.
 

BigCj34

Member
Joined
5 Apr 2016
Messages
769
Anyway fear not, Boris Johnson an Irish Sea bridge between NI and Scotland so all is good! No idea if that would include a railway though.
 

deltic08

On Moderation
Joined
26 Aug 2013
Messages
2,717
Location
North
At the macro level, that proposition just about holds water. But the geared turbofan of 2015 bears virtually no resemblance to a 1960s turbojet other than they both turn fuel into thrust.
If you mean that there's no non-liquid fuelled alternative then again, I just about agree with you. But there's no reason why that liquid needs to be a hydrocarbon, and even less reason why it has to be from fossil fuel.
What would it run on then?
 

najaB

Veteran Member
Joined
28 Aug 2011
Messages
30,784
Location
Scotland
What would it run on then?
There have ready been both commercial and military trials of bioderived fuels. And direct hydrocarbon synthesis has come a long way in recent years.

In terms of energy density, some alcohols could reasonably act as substitutes.
 

route101

Established Member
Joined
16 May 2010
Messages
10,612
Was looking at the Bridge just to the west of East Kilbride station , the bridge has them guards you find on bridges on lines with wires , maybe ok for the wires to go in . I know some of the bridges further down are not though.
 

yorkie

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Administrator
Joined
6 Jun 2005
Messages
67,761
Location
Yorkshire
This thread appears to have run its course.

If anyone wishes to post ideas or speculative posts, please use the Speculative Ideas section.

If there are any actual developments on any proposed expansion, these can be discussed in a new thread dedicated to that particular project in the Infrastructure & Stations section, but any ideas people have still need to be posted in Speculative Ideas.

Thanks.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top