I dont think anyone is being critical mate, I for one appreciate any info that comes outRight okay, Genius was wrong this morning. It had the DT leading up to Liverpool... I won't bother giving gen anymore then?

I dont think anyone is being critical mate, I for one appreciate any info that comes outRight okay, Genius was wrong this morning. It had the DT leading up to Liverpool... I won't bother giving gen anymore then?
Ah, but none of the cranks would have been on it if it was a 185!I’m not convinced everyone would have got on a 185.
Right okay, Genius was wrong this morning. It had the DT leading up to Liverpool... I won't bother giving gen anymore then?
Terminating at Man Vic. Problem on the train.
Problem with spare unit actually.No driver.
Problem with spare unit actually.
I correct myself. The diagram is showing no driver rostered after MCV at 1430.
But also I note a 5H88 from MCV to Longsight at 1307 which has comments about a fault with the DT on LHCS TP09.
Errr windscreen washer isn't the full story.Ignore that no driver thing. Yesterday it showed no driver rostered all day and it still ran.
Yes the DT has a windscreen washer issue.
Errr windscreen washer isn't the full story.
Oh right what's up with TP11?For the first set it is.
For the second set it’s a different fault.
Wasted an hour at Garforth this afternoon, waiting to photograph the 13.56 ex LIV. Learnt it was cancelled throughout "due to a problem with the train", 17.44 ex Scarboro also cancelled, I expect the two hour gap went down well on a hot Bank Holiday Monday. Was there really no spare 185 at Ardwick?Oh BB21, whilst I agree with your sentiment, guys please do provide what info you can. Presumably TP chose not to provide a 185 backup today, which could have been OK if it was actually TP11, but if that is a non-starter, not so good.
My plan scuppered this morning thank you.5F48 been canceled from Longsight this morning....