• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Low Speed Derailment Sheffield 11/11

Status
Not open for further replies.

zwk500

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Jan 2020
Messages
15,346
Location
Bristol
Surely more platforms available than that from the south at least? Whats wrong with 5/6/8?
6 can't be access from the south due to signalling limitations. The overlap to enter 5 from the south may be fouled by the derailed train. Platform 8 is being used. Lots of units are stabled in Sheffield station overnight, it may well be the case that 8 had a unit in it when the incident happened that has now been cleared
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Crossover

Established Member
Joined
4 Jun 2009
Messages
9,404
Location
Yorkshire
Would I be correct in thinking that anything north from p8 would cross over at Nunnery Main Line Jn?
 

MadCommuter

Member
Joined
4 Oct 2010
Messages
659
The train had come off the Hope Valley, and was heading to Dewsbury. Exactly what other route was it meant to run?
Ah, sorry, didn't realise it was ex-Hope Valley. It would appear that there isn't another option. I was reading earlier comments about other routes and presumed, wrongly, that this would apply to the freight.
 

dk1

Veteran Member
Joined
2 Oct 2009
Messages
17,997
Location
East Anglia
I would imagine the use of some diversionary routes particularly for XC are limited at the moment due to suspension of much route refreshing due to in cab social distancing issues. It's been over six months too since the pandemic began.
 

zwk500

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Jan 2020
Messages
15,346
Location
Bristol
I would imagine the use of some diversionary routes particularly for XC are limited at the moment due to suspension of much route refreshing due to in cab social distancing issues. It's been over six months too since the pandemic began.
As was said above (post #23), XC don't maintain knowledge of the diversions in normal times, it isn't just a COVID thing. Probably because they don't run any trains that would feasbily avoid Sheffield (EM use the ECS moves to/from Derby to maintain knowledge of the Old Road).
 

Ianno87

Veteran Member
Joined
3 May 2015
Messages
15,214
I would imagine the use of some diversionary routes particularly for XC are limited at the moment due to suspension of much route refreshing due to in cab social distancing issues. It's been over six months too since the pandemic began.

From http://www.psul4all.free-online.co.uk/2020.html it looks like XC don't (nor any TOC) have any regular 'route learner' service planned between Beighton Jn and Masborough Jn to maintain knowledge via this route via a normal service train (they only do the 'Old Road' to get to Sheffield the long way around from Derby)

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

As was said above (post #23), XC don't maintain knowledge of the diversions in normal times, it isn't just a COVID thing. Probably because they don't run any trains that would feasbily avoid Sheffield (EM use the ECS moves to/from Derby to maintain knowledge of the Old Road).

XC do ordinarily send:
1V81 0559 Sheffield - Reading
1M00 1700 Glasgow Central - Birmingham New Street

Via the 'Old Road' to maintain route knowledge, but reversing out of Sheffield via Nunnery.
 

zwk500

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Jan 2020
Messages
15,346
Location
Bristol
From http://www.psul4all.free-online.co.uk/2020.html it looks like XC don't (nor any TOC) have any regular 'route learner' service planned between Beighton Jn and Masborough Jn to maintain knowledge via this route via a normal service train (they only do the 'Old Road' to get to Sheffield the long way around from Derby)

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==



XC do ordinarily send:
1V81 0559 Sheffield - Reading
1M00 1700 Glasgow Central - Birmingham New Street

Via the 'Old Road' to maintain route knowledge, but reversing out of Sheffield via Nunnery.
So they still serve Sheffield, and therefore are missing the key part of the diversionary route that would have been necessary in this instance. But thanks for pointing out the reversals, interesting to know they do cover for failure south of Sheffield.
 

Ianno87

Veteran Member
Joined
3 May 2015
Messages
15,214
So they still serve Sheffield, and therefore are missing the key part of the diversionary route that would have been necessary in this instance. But thanks for pointing out the reversals, interesting to know they do cover for failure south of Sheffield.

Yes, in this scenario they can serve Sheffield entirely via their normal route; only signing the Old Road route isn't massively helpful in this scenario.

*If* they signed Beighton-Masborough they'd probably be avoiding Sheffield entirely to ease congestion.
 

class 9

Member
Joined
18 Nov 2010
Messages
1,011
I would imagine the use of some diversionary routes particularly for XC are limited at the moment due to suspension of much route refreshing due to in cab social distancing issues. It's been over six months too since the pandemic began.
All reviews are being done by video on Tablets at the moment.
 

Taunton

Established Member
Joined
1 Aug 2013
Messages
11,181
So, in the name of equality, no-one gets to travel at all. The "reasonable adjustment" clause in the legislation should allow whatever is available in an emergency to be used by those who can, and ensure a bespoke solution is provided for any exceptions.
Oh no, that's the 20th century approach. Nowadays being politically correct, and virtue signalling that you have done so, is far more important.

We have to be grateful that this happened in England. If in Scotland the police would have closed it as a "crime scene" for the next three months.
 

OneOffDave

Member
Joined
2 Apr 2015
Messages
453
We have to be grateful that this happened in England. If in Scotland the police would have closed it as a "crime scene" for the next three months.

Which non-fatal derailment have the police in Scotland declared a "crime scene" for three months or is that just ill informed hyperbole?
 

Ianno87

Veteran Member
Joined
3 May 2015
Messages
15,214
Which non-fatal derailment have the police in Scotland declared a "crime scene" for three months or is that just ill informed hyperbole?

I'd guess it is hyperbole, given that NR have used the prolonged closure to seemingly at least partially rebuild the bridge and embankment at Carmont once the carriages were recovered.
 

Bungle

Member
Joined
18 May 2009
Messages
113
Platform 1 appears to also be available, at least for Norwich-Liverpool and v.v, 1L06 Liverpool-Nottingham in it now.
 

YorkshireBear

Established Member
Joined
23 Jul 2010
Messages
9,132
Which non-fatal derailment have the police in Scotland declared a "crime scene" for three months or is that just ill informed hyperbole?

I think it is in reference to them treating carmont as a crime scene directly against the memorandum of understanding between the police and RAIB/HSE/ORR. Which is that unless there is obvious case of criminality or criminal negligence RAIB (or rail industry) will have control of the site not police. Despite no evidence at all of criminality police treated carmont as a crime scene massively delaying recovery and hampering investigations.

That is what is being reported in parts of the railway press anyway.
 

island

Veteran Member
Joined
30 Dec 2010
Messages
17,422
Location
0036
So, in the name of equality, no-one gets to travel at all. The "reasonable adjustment" clause in the legislation should allow whatever is available in an emergency to be used by those who can, and ensure a bespoke solution is provided for any exceptions.
Well, quite. Surely it is not outside the the wit of mankind to put the able-bodied passengers onto the available vehicles and handle the tiny minority of passengers unable to use them on accessible minicabs or suchlike.
 

alangla

Member
Joined
11 Apr 2018
Messages
1,178
Location
Glasgow
It's difficult to know where to start with some of the idiocy that seems to be on display here. XC have 1 train a day (looks like 1M00 from Edinburgh is the only one in the current TT) that maintains knowledge of the southern half of the Old Road (good) but didn't think that there might be an unplanned scenario where knowledge of the northern part would be necessary? Presumably this means they're snookered if there's a points failure at Nunnery Main Line, Holmes or Meadowhall junctions as well? It's not like they're retaining the whole of the S&C or Cumbrian Coast - it's a short freight route which only needs 1 train at an odd time of the day to avoid Sheffield to retain.

As for the bus thing, if that's true then it's absolutely ridiculous - for the number of passengers likely to be directly impacted, surely it's well within the regulations (and probably cheaper) to offer an accessible taxi to their destination, even if that happens to be Penzance.
 

alangla

Member
Joined
11 Apr 2018
Messages
1,178
Location
Glasgow
Which non-fatal derailment have the police in Scotland declared a "crime scene" for three months or is that just ill informed hyperbole?

Was the memorandum of understanding not a result of Strathclyde Police detaining & interviewing a train load of VT passengers in the late 1990s after a minor track-spread derailment during a diversion in the Mossend area?
 

Killingworth

Established Member
Joined
30 May 2018
Messages
5,730
Location
Sheffield
BBC reports seem to have made this sound worse than it is. Radio 2 just saying buses replace trains to Manchester. As Northern and EMR services are running normally and TPE have been getting through for the last hour or so that sounds alarmist.
 

dk1

Veteran Member
Joined
2 Oct 2009
Messages
17,997
Location
East Anglia
As was said above (post #23), XC don't maintain knowledge of the diversions in normal times, it isn't just a COVID thing. Probably because they don't run any trains that would feasbily avoid Sheffield (EM use the ECS moves to/from Derby to maintain knowledge of the Old Road).
I thought they had the odd diversionary route that was covered by late night trains unless the driver informed the signaller he/she didn't require it so early finish it is :p
 

LowLevel

Established Member
Joined
26 Oct 2013
Messages
8,232
BBC reports seem to have made this sound worse than it is. Radio 2 just saying buses replace trains to Manchester. As Northern and EMR services are running normally and TPE have been getting through for the last hour or so that sounds alarmist.

To be fair the bulk of Sheffield's trade at the minute is the East facing local services which have been suspended - they've just picked the wrong route to mention :lol:
 

keith1879

Member
Joined
1 Jun 2015
Messages
393
How are Northern and EMR able to run services from Manchester-Sheffield via Hope Valley yet TPE can't run any services to/from Sheffield is only one Platform availble?
I have seen at least one TPE train pass Davenport this morning and judging from Realtime Trains there is a reduced TPE service running.
 

palmersears

Established Member
Joined
20 Sep 2011
Messages
1,487
Was it this one?
No, it was 6E91, Earles Sidings to Dewsbury Cement:

 

theironroad

Established Member
Joined
21 Nov 2014
Messages
3,717
Oh no, that's the 20th century approach. Nowadays being politically correct, and virtue signalling that you have done so, is far more important.

We have to be grateful that this happened in England. If in Scotland the police would have closed it as a "crime scene" for the next three months.

If that's in anyway a hint at the recent Carmont tragedy near stonehaven then it's pretty disrespectful.

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

Just a note with rail replacements. They have been offered a number of coaches that are free and parked up but have refused them because they arnt PSVAR vehicles. That was at 0635.
If that's the only reason they've refused them and there are people waiting at stations because no other vehicles are available then that policy is seriously flawed.
 

pdeaves

Established Member
Joined
14 Sep 2014
Messages
5,631
Location
Gateway to the South West
If that's the only reason they've refused them and there are people waiting at stations because no other vehicles are available then that policy is seriously flawed.
I agree. 'That's what the rules say'. I am often reminded of something I heard (in an engineering standards context, but could be applied elsewhere as well) "standards are for the blind obedience of fools and the guidance of the wise".
 

LucyP

On Moderation
Joined
17 Jul 2018
Messages
148
There must be every type of coach available at the moment, because no one is going anywhere. Every coach operator's base has a yard packed full of them when you drive past. It's just an excuse to do nothing and provide rubbish customer service as usual.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top