800101 did 1E13 Inverness to Doncaster where it was removed from service.800101 did Inverness to KGX and 1730 KGX-EDB, 800105 did 0648 Glasgow to KGX, 1430 KGX-EDB, 2000 EDB-NCL, think was 800209 on the Leeds, rest were 801s
800101 did 1E13 Inverness to Doncaster where it was removed from service.800101 did Inverness to KGX and 1730 KGX-EDB, 800105 did 0648 Glasgow to KGX, 1430 KGX-EDB, 2000 EDB-NCL, think was 800209 on the Leeds, rest were 801s
From what I have been informed LSL are running Paddington to Plymouth with 8 coaches and Kings Cross to York with a similar length trains. GWR also be using 57s.Any confirm on this ? Just seeing conjecture, gossip and rumour at the moment
Lner side of it is absolute Wibble. Lner running a normal timetable tomorrow but with 10 cancellations, all formed of AzumasFrom what I have been informed LSL are running Paddington to Plymouth with 8 coaches and Kings Cross to York with a similar length trains. GWR also be using 57s.
This comes from a group on Facebook for railway employees so whether it is froth and wibble is anyone's guess
Lner side of it is absolute Wibble. Lner running a normal timetable tomorrow but with 10 cancellations, all formed of Azumas
Possibly, from what I've read it indicated they would be in operation for the next 10 to 14 days. Interesting times whatever happens. LSL would be using 90s if is true.Lner side of it is absolute Wibble. Lner running a normal timetable tomorrow but with 10 cancellations, all formed of Azumas
They are discussing bringing them back early. But nothing has been agreedIs the one about the mk4 sets true ?
If someone was planning a long distance journey such as that and hadn't checked anything at all prior to travelling they are completely irresponsible. That goes for any day.
Talk ofAny confirm on this ? Just seeing conjecture, gossip and rumour at the moment
....and I stand proud of being a magnet for carnage, chaos and calamity during my time managing front-line OpsIf nothing else, I think you have the most appropriate name on here for this thread!
Ah that makes sense800101 did 1E13 Inverness to Doncaster where it was removed from service.
I guess they are fortunate (to a degree) the engineering work has thinned the service. Hopefully by Monday enough will be checked for normal service to resume. From loading on the services I have used recently 5 car is fine. (But not used a Edinburgh servic)Lner side of it is absolute Wibble. Lner running a normal timetable tomorrow but with 10 cancellations, all formed of Azumas
BR ran far more trains than the privatised railway does. Just many of them were freight.Somewhat academic when most of the service isn't running.
BR didn't run as many trains as the privatised railways does.
The haste with which Mk4 and Mk3 vehicles have been sent to the cutters torch.This is not looking good at all. Talk of hiring emergency fleets, at least 10-14 days before returning to service? I hope Hitachi have a fair few million down the back of the sofa.
Still same amount of units running around even tho Kings Cross work ongoing. Passenger loadings are up to 270 people on some trains, which is more capacity than a 5 car is allowed in covid timesI guess they are fortunate (to a degree) the engineering work has thinned the service. Hopefully by Monday enough will be checked for normal service to resume. From loading on the services I have used recently 5 car is fine. (But not used a Edinburgh servic)
You're about right in terms of the order of magnitude of their losses - in lost 'lease' payments (with the original IEP contracts they simply don't get paid if they don't provide the trains) and other compensation.This is not looking good at all. Talk of hiring emergency fleets, at least 10-14 days before returning to service? I hope Hitachi have a fair few million down the back of the sofa.
Actually a /0 and a /1 have already been withdrawn from traffic after similar areas of concern have been found. Checks will be finished tomorrow and we’ll see if any more are affected.
Apologies, simple question and statement as to what was being said on here. With this and other social media sites you would expect all moves to Booths and Sims to be stopped and Ely to be cleared of stuff back in to traffic !!Talk of
Never said it was confirmed.
The haste with which IETs etc were ordered is equally alarming. All the eggs are in one basket design wise. Did not seem like anyone wanted to sit back and see how the first orders settled in before jumping on the same hope/aspiration. So many ordered that Newton Aylcliffe could not build all of them. What follows will be a lack of demand leading to a risk of Newton Aylcliffe closing. What ever happened to steady orders of replacement trains just like a rolling program of electrification - oh !.The haste with which Mk4 and Mk3 vehicles have been sent to the cutters torch.
It does seem to be quite a recent phenomenon for withdrawn trains to be cut up pronto, whereas place like Long Marston have played host to trains that have sat withdrawn for many years in some cases. A more joined up process would have seen that stuff that has no doubt deteriorated beyond any sensible use cut and replaced with stuff that came out of service more recently.
Same applies to 317s going to Leeds in 1998. Different world back then!No because there are no guards that sign them atm
They are discussing bringing them back early. But nothing has been agreed
Where do they need to provide replacement buses? They have provided replacement trains between Paddington and Didcot and there are alternatives on much of the rest of their network.Will GWR actually get off their backsides and provide replacement buses? I'm not accepting being stuck miles from home with no hope and diminishing money...
Haste?The haste with which Mk4 and Mk3 vehicles have been sent to the cutters torch.
It does seem to be quite a recent phenomenon for withdrawn trains to be cut up pronto, whereas place like Long Marston have played host to trains that have sat withdrawn for many years in some cases. A more joined up process would have seen that stuff that has no doubt deteriorated beyond any sensible use cut and replaced with stuff that came out of service more recently.
TfW services aren't listed as an alternative option so Swindon to South WalesWhere do they need to provide replacement buses? They have provided replacement trains between Paddington and Didcot and there are alternatives on much of the rest of their network.
It's not clear at the moment that this is solely yaw damper related, the reason given for the current situation is cracks being found in jacking point/lifting pockets. It is logical to expect these to be adjacent to the yaw damper brackets but whether they are suffering from an issue arising from there and migrating remains to be seen.History repeats itself. Early 90mph plus units such as Class 158 were plagued by yaw damper bracket fatigue problems and it's surprising that the 8xx designers didn't know about that and take it into account.
Didcot to Swindon is another one. Not much of an alternative unless a stuttle service is running between Swindon and Cheltenham Spa.Where do they need to provide replacement buses? They have provided replacement trains between Paddington and Didcot and there are alternatives on much of the rest of their network.
TfW services aren't listed as an alternative option so Swindon to South Wales
TfW services aren't listed as an alternative option so Swindon to South Wales