GRALISTAIR
Established Member
Just seen this - fantasticWell I see that the Sellafield Box is now all women staffed - nice piece here
Sellafield signal box staffed entirely by women - BBC News
Just seen this - fantasticWell I see that the Sellafield Box is now all women staffed - nice piece here
Sellafield signal box staffed entirely by women - BBC News
Off-topic, but the true goal is for the gender of any staff member to be considered irrelevant. As well as everything else in the equality act. Of course, we are still many, many years from that happening. So I am glad that NR is making some noise about making opportunities available for all. There's still lots for NR to do, and much of it is behind time, but progress is still worthy of praise.I went past last Tuesday 29th and noticed it was a Female watching us go by.
Would this one at Worcester Shrub Hill count? The caption says it's a gantry but it's not as large as others and it doesn't span over the track:Coming back to the subject of semaphore gantries upthread, it seems we have identified just three survivors, at Llandudno, Hilton Jct and Shrewsbury (the latter with only one semaphore arm remaining). Are these all that are left? Remember all those lovely gantries from years ago at places such as Southampton, Taunton, Newton Abbot, Scarborough, Exeter and Aberdeen.....
© Copyright David Robinson and licensed for reuse under this Creative Commons Licence.Semaphore Signals at Worcester Shrub Hill
A London Midland service entering Worcester Shrub Hill railway station past a gantry of semaphore signals.
That's a bracket signal, not a gantry.Would this one at Worcester Shrub Hill count? The caption says it's a gantry but it's not as large as others and it doesn't span over the track:
View attachment 99279
© Copyright David Robinson and licensed for reuse under this Creative Commons Licence.
![]()
Semaphore Signals at Worcester Shrub... © David Robinson
A London Midland service departing Worcester Shrub Hill railway station past an array of semaphore signals.www.geograph.org.uk
-Peter
To be fair, the gantries at all those places went because they were either to complex to maintain, too busy to work for signallers or not suited to modern high-speed traffic. Shrewsbury would probably have gone by now if it wasn't such a pain to resignal the other end of the station.Coming back to the subject of semaphore gantries upthread, it seems we have identified just three survivors, at Llandudno, Hilton Jct and Shrewsbury (the latter with only one semaphore arm remaining). Are these all that are left? Remember all those lovely gantries from years ago at places such as Southampton, Taunton, Newton Abbot, Scarborough, Exeter and Aberdeen.....
That's a bracket signal, not a gantry.
Ah cool - thanks bothYes I agree, it's a bracket.
As I have said on another thread on this site the only book I can think of is the Signalling Atlas and signal box register ( 3rd edition ) 2010 a bit out of date but contains all that you want to know.Is there a list anywhere of surviving signalboxes with semaphores?
Many thanks! I'll look out for that. Maybe it will get updated at some time, but possibly too few boxes left now to make it worthwhile.As I have said on another thread on this site the only book I can think of is the Signalling Atlas and signal box register ( 3rd edition ) 2010 a bit out of date but contains all that you want to know.
It will probably be updated in the none too distant future, when those who do the work can find the time. It covers not just manual boxes, but all boxes and signalling throughout Britain and Ireland, including preserved and redundant boxes.Many thanks! I'll look out for that. Maybe it will get updated at some time, but possibly too few boxes left now to make it worthwhile.
When the Havant area was resignalled in 2007 (?), a very short overlap was built in for down trains entering the station. Not totally sure of its purpose as its after the two crossovers and from experience it does prevent the level crossing gates being opened as presumably part of the train hasnt operated any release mechanism. Overlap seems very short as shown in the attached photo of a SWT 450 at the signal with a Southern unit still platformed. Theres also a signal for down trains to enter the up platform just at the end of the crossoverJust a reminder: the reason for overlaps is two fold, first, to mitigate driver error (late braking, distraction, loss of concentration) and secondly, possible loss of braking performance (wet/slippery rails, wheel slide, braking system fault).
The standard overlap is a nominal 200 yards / 183 metres in length. But a reduced overlap of 50 yards / 183 metres can be used if the line speed is low, or the preceding signal is approached released (approached controlled) from red (and hence, the approach speed of the train is reduced).
Alternatively, it may be possible to have swinging overlaps, if it is possible for the points ahead of the signal to move, and so provide an alternative length of track that will now form the overlap distance.
In special circumstances, it appears it is possible to have modern colour light signalling with no overlap or very short overlaps. See the signalling at Bristol Temple Meads for an example, especially the mid platform signals.
Is it intended to allow a train from the Petersfield route to get past the junction rather than be held before it, if an up train is heading along the coast? Although it wouldn’t allow for a 10 or 12 car train.When the Havant area was resignalled in 2007 (?), a very short overlap was built in for down trains entering the station. Not totally sure of its purpose as its after the two crossovers and from experience it does prevent the level crossing gates being opened as presumably part of the train hasnt operated any release mechanism. Overlap seems very short as shown in the attached photo of a SWT 450 at the signal with a Southern unit still platformed. Theres also a signal for down trains to enter the up platform just at the end of the crossover
Thats the only reason I can think of but as you say probably only a four car train otherwise various releases at the crossing and junction may not trigger but thats conjecture. I posted the photo in response to the comment about longer overlaps being the norm with colour lights as I was surprised just how little overlap there is hereIs it intended to allow a train from the Petersfield route to get past the junction rather than be held before it, if an up train is heading along the coast? Although it wouldn’t allow for a 10 or 12 car train.
The full overlap beyond that signal is 200 metres, however there is a reduced/restrictive overlap which is only 45 metres. Generally when using the shorter overlap the signal before will be approach controlled. The presence of these signals essentially allows a shorter platform re-occupation, referred to as closing up signals. Ignoring the shorter overlaps, this works in this circumstance by allowing a following train to proceed past the signal protecting the junctions outside the station before the train in front has fully departed the platform.When the Havant area was resignalled in 2007 (?), a very short overlap was built in for down trains entering the station. Not totally sure of its purpose as its after the two crossovers and from experience it does prevent the level crossing gates being opened as presumably part of the train hasnt operated any release mechanism. Overlap seems very short as shown in the attached photo of a SWT 450 at the signal with a Southern unit still platformed. Theres also a signal for down trains to enter the up platform just at the end of the crossover
I understand that there are similar 'closing up' signals at Ashford on platforms 1/2 and 5/6.The full overlap beyond that signal is 200 metres, however there is a reduced/restrictive overlap which is only 45 metres. Generally when using the shorter overlap the signal before will be approach controlled. The presence of these signals essentially allows a shorter platform re-occupation, referred to as closing up signals. Ignoring the shorter overlaps, this works in this circumstance by allowing a following train to proceed past the signal protecting the junctions outside the station before the train in front has fully departed the platform.
Went through Deal recently, nice to see semaphores again. Does anyone know why this tiny island exists among a sea of colour lights ? Same thought about Beeston Castle between Crewe and Chester. Is there some historic reason why they still remain, perhaps both sites had some local need for a man on the ground (coal at Beeston ?) that made it logical to leave a manned box if the signals were all in good condition.All colour light
There are still semaphores at Deal (Kent) and Littlehampton/Bognor Regis (West Sussex) but I reckon these will go sooner rather than later, and thus won't be the last on the national network
Helsby also appears to be a semaphore island on the North Cheshire route from Chester to Warrington Bank Quay.Went through Deal recently, nice to see semaphores again. Does anyone know why this tiny island exists among a sea of colour lights ? Same thought about Beeston Castle between Crewe and Chester. Is there some historic reason why they still remain, perhaps both sites had some local need for a man on the ground (coal at Beeston ?) that made it logical to leave a manned box if the signals were all in good condition.
Will probably go when Chester gets re-signaled. That's knocking 40 years old so it depends on how much life extension it gets.Helsby also appears to be a semaphore island on the North Cheshire route from Chester to Warrington Bank Quay.
Does anyone know how long they are likely to last?
Its future replacement (which I desperately hope someone has christened Anderson's Synthesiser) is the optical landslip detection equipment that's been installed at some points on the network already. I posted a thread about one that I saw recently - https://www.railforums.co.uk/threads/landslip-detection.220007/.I wonder how long Anderson's Piano on the Oban line will last (see my avatur!)
There's Frodsham Jn too on the same stretch, recently upgraded for the Halton Curve route, and Norton (a more modern box), and Mickle Trafford.Helsby also appears to be a semaphore island on the North Cheshire route from Chester to Warrington Bank Quay.
Does anyone know how long they are likely to last?
I thought that Crewe and Chester power boxes only date from the 1980s?The trouble it that the 1960s power boxes with obsolete electronics are needing renewal, while the manual boxes can carry on almost indefinitely.
Crewe won't touch Beeston as far as I know.There's Frodsham Jn too on the same stretch, recently upgraded for the Halton Curve route, and Norton (a more modern box), and Mickle Trafford.
All should really have gone into Chester or Warrington PSBs by now, but will probably wait till Manchester ROC takes the lot over.
Crewe resignalling should sort out Beeston Castle and Crewe Steel Works (it's an awkward long block between them).
The trouble it that the 1960/70s power boxes with obsolete electronics are needing renewal, while the manual boxes can carry on almost indefinitely.
Rail 940 has a picture of the ex-Midland Railway lower-quadrant semaphore at Ketton (Peterborough-Oakham route) which looks like being a heritage survivor - it's pre-1900.
It's said to be the only lower-quadrant signal left which is not of GWR origin.
Still means they are reaching the end of their design life. Its normally only 40 years.I thought that Crewe and Chester power boxes only date from the 1980s?
They are mid-1980s, and there are certainly some older, like Warrington/Preston/Carlisle.I thought that Crewe and Chester power boxes only date from the 1980s?