Deltic1961
Member
- Joined
- 30 May 2018
- Messages
- 645
That's pretty much how the oil industry worked in Aberdeen. People poaching for higher salaries. But it's not sustainable in any way.
There hasn't been a shortage of pilots in recent years, far from it. Even just pre Covid there was a significant glut of them.Bar Pilots, of which there was pre-pandemic an ever growing shortage of, the incentives are really negligible. Plenty of ex cabin-crew and airline staff have been on the railway for years and more have come over due to Covid. It's been quite refreshing really.
Reality is, rail is going to have to tighten it's belt. Wage rises that we've seen in the past two decades will be no more and voluntary redundancies are coming. Strike action won't change that.
There hasn't been a shortage of pilots in recent years, far from it. Even just pre Covid there was a significant glut of them.
There are pilots flying for Ryanair/Easyjet etc on less than a train driver gets, and newly qualified Easyjet First Officers start at just north of £40k, whilst trying to pay back about £100k of flight training costs unless they've come in ready trained.
Cheaper for businesses to poach workers, or import them from other countries, than to train them. It is part of the short-termism which is endemic in UK (and US ) capitalism, compared, say, with Germany.
It’s strange because on Sunday you said in this thread:I just got off a 2 car 158 (Inverurie to Montrose) at Aberdeen and there were less than 20 people on it. As I said not sustainable.
No-one checked my ticket on Friday because it was a 2 car class 158 from Inverness and it was rammed
Yet customers get higher than inflation fare rises every year. As I said previously there is a point where people say enough is enough and that is pretty close in Scotland if not here already.
Gonna be lots of tears when the gravy train hits the buffers but it's happened in many sectors over the years. The railway system employees seem to think they're exempt somehow....
I just got off a 2 car 158 (Inverurie to Montrose) at Aberdeen and there were less than 20 people on it. As I said not sustainable.
If you don't run the trains there'll be no prospect of tempting people back.Well there's no point running them with no customers. 19:57 Aberdeen to Inverurie as we speak just about to leave platform 7N. There are 3 people on the entire train.
If they'd cancelled it you'd have been moaning that Scotrail had let you down once again.Well there's no point running them with no customers. 19:57 Aberdeen to Inverurie as we speak just about to leave platform 7N. There are 3 people on the entire train.
Indeed. There's a part of society that appears to want to live their lives risk-free from now on. It's something I'm afraid I can't relate to.I was supposed to be meeting a couple of friends (aged 48 and 66) next Friday for a beer. Before Covid we met up in a busy pub every 4 to 6 weeks. Now they've both called off because they don't want to "risk covid" by going out for tea despite being double jabbed. This is where we're at folks. Surely the railway is suffernig consequential losses of a similar fashion?
They are, gradually. Not enough passengers, not enough drivers, not enough profit.I was on a bus home the other day, only person on it. They should just get rid of busses imo.
And the same thing will happen with trains. It's just that those who work on the railways think they are special and it won't happen.They are, gradually. Not enough passengers, not enough drivers, not enough profit.
And the same thing will happen with trains. It's just that those who work on the railways think they are special and it won't happen.
I think that, in due course, we could end up with just the major routes - rail and bus.We should maybe just get rid of public transport altogether?
And the same thing will happen with trains. It's just that those who work on the railways think they are special and it won't happen.
Very true, but there also needs to be a thorough review of what is really needed. If routes are to remain relatively unchanged then - in my view - some economies need to be made. We seem to have an expensive railway to keep, and an expensive railway for passengers to use.Well rail is a bit different in all fairness. You can withdraw a bus route quickly and easily. With a train there is a whole network of infrastructure, knowledge, skills and equipment that is unique to the railway, it isn't something that can be taken away and then brought back quickly like a bus could if demand increases again. Look at some of the lines and services reopening nowadays which were closed under Beeching.
It's taken decades to reinstate lines that people once wrote off. We shouldn't be making the same mistake again. It's better to try and attract people back to the railways after a year and a half of low usage (which in a network approaching 200 years old is barely a blip) than to close it down in the way some people here seem to be wishing for.
It's the curse of the UK economy. Cheaper for businesses to poach workers, or import them from other countries, than to train them. It is part of the short-termism which is endemic in UK (and US ) capitalism, compared, say, with Germany.
We should maybe just get rid of public transport altogether?