Xenophon PCDGS
Veteran Member
Or even in the decade before that.The leadership are fighting the government as much as anybody else. A lot of it is pure politics like 1983.
Or even in the decade before that.The leadership are fighting the government as much as anybody else. A lot of it is pure politics like 1983.
They were for quite a few years after the steam engines went, ensuring pay stayed low for everybody else!
Do you recall the Beeching era of the nationalised railway? How many railway jobs were lost then and what tactics did the rail unions use at that time?How is it nonsense ?
If the railway is nationalised and the entire workforce goes on strike at the same time then that’s more effective than groups of staff for various tocs going on strike.
Also If it is nationalised it can’t go bust. The government foots the bill. So nobody loses their jobs.
Doctors and judges are completely different disciplines. That is not a good comparison.It’s not a glass ceiling. It’s a completely different career path, as has been pointed out. It’s like suggesting that doctors should be able to progress on to become High Court judges.
Regrettably for you, a very good friend of mine is a Band 8 nurse who his about to transition back to the NHS after 12 years in the private sector based in London. Even there, the proportion of NHS staff doing bank shifts in the private sector is perhaps not as high as you seem to imagine.
Subject to negotiations with their employer, everyone gets paid “take it or leave it wages”. Different employers will pay different rates depending on a number of factors, even within the nursing market.
But seeing as you’re insistent on making parallels with nursing, I should point out that there really aren’t that many parallels you can realistically draw. Nursing vacancies remain unfilled because of a paucity of suitable candidates. However, a ward can still be run “short handed” provided that the safety margins are not breached. You can’t really do this with traincrew without cancellations.
Doctors and judges are completely different disciplines. That is not a good comparison.
There are many thousands of qualified staff who are sitting it out. There is a lack of candidates only at the current rates of pay, which do not get increased to fill them.
The wages are fixed by the budget and the service fits around the workforce, just like the NHS.
In the end the remaining secondmen will have became guards or drivers, but it took about 20yrs to do.So what happened in the end? Given you've argued the unions position is "they can't really do anything else until the jobs have gone". Where did they go?
Do you recall the Beeching era of the nationalised railway? How many railway jobs were lost then and what tactics did the rail unions use at that time?
Only someone living in the 1950s tinewarp would think judges know as much about medicine as nurses do.Precisely!! Just like nursing and medicine. Geddit?
Cite your source for “many thousands” please.
Only half right. The service defines the required staffing establishment, not the other way around. And that applies in the NHS as on the railways.
The railway lost jobs almost continuously from WW2 until it was privatised and had endless strikes to protect wasteful and unproductive jobs and practices that kept down pay and threatened their viability.The redundancy payments were generous , and there were significant transfers from say South Wales to Kent for displaced staff etc. Not to say it was an easy transition in any way.
Only someone living in the 1950s tinewarp would think judges know as much about medicine as nurses do.
There are around 700,000 registered nurses on the permanent register, 600,000 of whom registered in the UK, roughly double the number working in the NHS, where 90% of health spending takes place.
The service is already fitting around the workforce before your eyes and the government has no contract with itself that will alter any of this.
That's the height of ignorance, selfishness and stupidity. If they come for the T&Cs of operation grades will you be expecting the maintenance team to back you up? We defend them, they defend us. It's simple and it's essential. No divide and conquer. We divide and we both lose! How short sighted can some people be.Exactly how I see it maintenance wouldn’t give two toots about us, so I’m afraid it’s look after your own as far as I’m concerned.
I’m annoyed the union is using use to add weight to the maintenance cause.
Too many people misleading what is actually being offered and what is at stake:
== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==
That's the height of ignorance, selfishness and stupidity. If they come for the T&Cs of operation grades will you be expecting the maintenance team to back you up? We defend them, they defend us. It's simple and it's essential. No divide and conquer. We divide and we both lose! How short sighted can some people be.
Says it all really. False reporting yet again.
Best go to the ASLEF website:
![]()
ASLEF Announces Strike Date | ASLEF
ASLEF, the train drivers’ union, has announced a day of strike action after train companies failed to make a pay offer to keep pace with the increase in the cost of living.aslef.org.uk
They’ve corrected their mistake now.
c2c aren’t balloting as far as I’m aware.
XC, Avanti and DRS ballots don't close until 27th
Err, yes the RMT is well aware of the track safety and safe system of work systems. And of the various accidents and incidents. Including all the internal railway investigations that are not made public.The reason for 39 weekends is because they want their staff working on tracks that are closed to trains. Too many people were getting killed and it should have happened years ago.
They never mention this when playing the safety card.
The unions were involved with the discussions regarding the use of inspection trains.Technology is meant to be replacing much of the patrolling and inspecting, and is actually better at it.
Err, ASLEF staff employed by eight TOCs are going on strike. And during the RMT strike earlier this year, some ASLEF members jointed the RMT picket lines.Interesting to note how ASLEF claim all these deals they have done with Freightliner and DB.
If ASLEF went on strike, these companies would lose their customers and the drivers would lose their jobs, in short order.
Compare and contrast.
I have a question for you, seeing as you post a lot about the whole situation and the current deal being offered, what is a realistic deal that you would actually accept?Err, yes the RMT is well aware of the track safety and safe system of work systems. And of the various accidents and incidents. Including all the internal railway investigations that are not made public.
Again, someone here who does not understand unions. The RMT is always very concerned with regards to the safety of their members.
The unions were involved with the discussions regarding the use of inspection trains.
Speaking of technology, the RMT has for some time been asking Network Rail to use technology to vastly improve the safety of lookout systems. But Network Rail decided to go for safeguarded (“green zone”) working instead.
Err, ASLEF staff employed by eight TOCs are going on strike. And during the RMT strike earlier this year, some ASLEF members jointed the RMT picket lines.
I see this is just starting to break amongst some of the media organisations on twitterFurther strike action called for Thursday 18th August and Saturday 20th August.
I suspect they copied and pasted the 8 tocs that announced ballot results on the same day.Thanks for the information everyone.
I suppose in the BBC's defence, it's difficult to be accurate first off when you're jumping on a scoop !
Also If it is nationalised it can’t go bust. The government foots the bill. So nobody loses their jobs.
Train drivers on Transport for Wales are to be balloted over strike action, union bosses have said after eight other companies agreed a 24-hour Saturday strike.
Members of Aslef at Arriva Rail London, Chiltern Railways, Greater Anglia, Great Western, Hull Trains, LNER, Southeastern and West Midlands Trains – which runs services from Shrewsbury to Birmingham alongside Transport for Wales's through trains from Powys – will walk out on July 30.
News to me, given that S&T and P.Way are all covered by the same T&Cs… And have been since the private contractors grabbed a slice of the privatisation action. This predates Network Rail.S&T & PWay have a long standing internal disagreement there was a dispute years ago which saw PW sell their S&T brothers down the river.
Do you recall the Beeching era of the nationalised railway? How many railway jobs were lost then and what tactics did the rail unions use at that time?
It can be closed though.
don’t rule that out.
Go back a few years. Would you then say it would be easier to resolve the dispute than to close the coal mines?Weren’t the beeching closures mainly on underused operations.
It would be easier to resolve the dispute than to close the railway.
Especially after they’ve boasted they’ve invested so much into it. !!
Because this dispute covers so many grade groups, that’s not easy to answer.I have a question for you, seeing as you post a lot about the whole situation and the current deal being offered, what is a realistic deal that you would actually accept?
I doubt the RMT care if they're futile or not at this point. They appear to be just on an ego trip at their members' expense.Are strikes between now and September futile? Johnson is going so will have no interest or incentive in solving the dispute and the government is in a state of paralysis amid a new leadership contest. There'll likely be a new transport minister come September time anyway.
I suspect they copied and pasted the 8 tocs that announced ballot results on the same day.
There are around 700,000 registered nurses on the permanent register, 600,000 of whom registered in the UK, roughly double the number working in the NHS, where 90% of health spending takes place.
News to me, given that S&T and P.Way are all covered by the same T&Cs… And have been since the private contractors grabbed a slice of the privatisation action. This predates Network Rail.
Then in around 2010/2011, a new working practice agreement came in, that affected S&T and P.Way. If anything the P.Way came off worse.
BR restructured the S&T in 1991/1992, the P.Way continued on the (older) existing BR T&Cs. Both groups stayed on their respective T&Cs until privatisation.Under BR. The wounds are deep, just like the RMT/NUR and ASLEF.
They want a 2 year deal but are offering less money than we are after for a one year deal and part of that is based on 'targets' being met.Why ? No real impact on current signallers, TMS actually benefits us (where we’re trained to use it) no compulsory redundancies for the life of the deal. The only issue I can see is the uplift to 67 vice 65.
The proposed increase in pay will now cover the current lose in strikes, I’d also say the self evidence proposals need work to allow us the time to compile the files.