I see the BBC are at it too today:
Latest data shows some 3.8m people have coronavirus - up a quarter of a million on the week before.
www.bbc.co.uk
It then goes on to explain that:
...but how many people will read that far into the article rather than just the headline and first paragraph,
so I think this definitely qualifies as yet more BBC 'fear mongering'
MARK
I was about to post about this FAKE headline but you beat me to it.
The BBC have plunged to new lows; they really are a disgrace.
The headline is completely misleading and their disclaimer that " more recent figures
suggest cases
may be on the way down" does not excuse their actions and is a huge understatement.
Note their use of words such as "suggests" and "may"; these weasel words were chosen very carefully in order to suit the BBC's agenda.
The BBC say "People are still able to catch the infection even if they have had Covid before"; this is not technically wrong but the wording is, in my opinion, at best incomplete and at worst misleading, as the majority of infections are
not reinfections, despite the vast majority of the population having already been exposed to Sars-CoV-2.
The BBC grudgingly admit towards the end of the article that fewer hospital admissions are testing positive and that there are fewer admissions.
The wording of this article is disgraceful, but is entirely consistent with the stance and behaviour I now expect of the BBC. I used to consider the BBC a far more respectable and trustworthy source of information prior to the pandemic, but my confidence in the BBC is now at an all time low and I now finding myself questioning many of their articles, not just Covid ones.
I can't see a name associated with this article. I'd like to see those responsible brought to account and for a full investigation to take place into the BBC's reporting of the pandemic throughout the past couple of years.