• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Nuneham Viaduct shut - Didcot- Oxford

Status
Not open for further replies.

Towers

Established Member
Joined
30 Aug 2021
Messages
1,706
Location
UK
I imagine that several emails were very quickly sent to various bridge engineers asking for them to come up with immediate solutions, but they were trying to keep the bridge open for as long as possible because closure was the absolute last resort.
But closure is, surely, inevitable! If the speed restrictions first appeared late last year and it's now April, that rather suggests a lack of urgency does it not?
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

stuu

Established Member
Joined
2 Sep 2011
Messages
2,803
A very wet March, but February was very dry and January average, so the winter rainfall was pretty average really.
Going from the driest February in 30 years to one of the wettest months on record is going to cause a lot more ground movement than an average winter
 

TurboMan

Member
Joined
5 Apr 2022
Messages
327
Location
UK
But closure is, surely, inevitable! If the speed restrictions first appeared late last year and it's now April, that rather suggests a lack of urgency does it not?
It's longer than that: the 50mph TSR was first introduced on 14th March 2022. I knew it had been there a long time, but I had to search through withdrawn WONs to find it a lot further back in time than I first thought.
 

Jimini

Established Member
Joined
8 Oct 2006
Messages
1,417
Location
London
It's longer than that: the 50mph TSR was first introduced on 14th March 2022. I knew it had been there a long time, but I had to search through withdrawn WONs to find it a lot further back in time than I first thought.

Yep that sounds familiar -- I remember bumping over it at full tilt in the spring before the TSR kicked in and thinking it didn't feel so great!
 

800001

Established Member
Joined
24 Oct 2015
Messages
3,634
XC train plan for tomorrow has southbound terminating at Oxford, and northbound terminating at Didcot.
 

zwk500

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Jan 2020
Messages
13,560
Location
Bristol
But closure is, surely, inevitable! If the speed restrictions first appeared late last year and it's now April, that rather suggests a lack of urgency does it not?
A lack of urgency is one possible explanation, but not the only one. It might be that initially the damage was thought to be less severe and it has worsened rapidly (a 50mph ESR isn't necessarily terminal). It might also be indicative of how difficult the solution is to design, or it might represent the difficulty in securing the engineering access and resources to actually repair it. It may also represent problems getting the budget for it agreed.
 

172007

Member
Joined
2 Jan 2021
Messages
752
Location
West Mids
East West Rail would allow WCML to Oxford. Should be W12 as surely it has to have European clearances from when it was planned?
 

Gloster

Established Member
Joined
4 Sep 2020
Messages
8,575
Location
Up the creek
I have just looked at National Rail Enquires. There is no red alert bar and against Cross Country it is saying Minor delays on some routes; Great Western has Major delays… but it has two other items. There is, at least, a fairly thorough summary of the arrangements if you persevere, but shouldn’t something like this be more prominent. Somebody getting on at Manchester might just look, see that there is nothing major, and go no further.
 

LNW-GW Joint

Veteran Member
Joined
22 Feb 2011
Messages
19,777
Location
Mold, Clwyd
Reminiscent of the failure of the Lamington viaduct/bridge over the upper Clyde in 2015/16.
That took 7 weeks to rebuild, and is probably an easier (shorter) example than the Nuneham bridge.
The Lamington bridge was also being monitored by NR for some years before the critical structural failure, and NR was fined for allowing trains over it on the day it failed.
 

Nicholas Lewis

Established Member
Joined
9 Aug 2019
Messages
6,184
Location
Surrey
Friend at NR sent me this from last week
That looks like a wing wall where the embankment transitions to the bridge structure rather than support columns in the Thames so would be a quicker fix although would still be at least a week if they have to get sheet pile in there and rebuild embankment.
 

fgwrich

Established Member
Joined
15 Apr 2009
Messages
9,314
Location
Between Edinburgh and Exeter
Looking at the report on South Today this evening, and the photo as shared above, I wonder if one of the Girders has dropped as well as the wing wall collapse. Either way, this is going to take longer than a few weeks to fix.

First item is Paul Cliftons report - Available for 24 hours from 18:30

 

Attachments

  • Screenshot 2023-04-03 at 22.39.31.png
    Screenshot 2023-04-03 at 22.39.31.png
    5.7 MB · Views: 489

4COR

Member
Joined
30 Jan 2019
Messages
463
Has it been especially wet in Oxfordshire this winter? The BBC report mentioned the ground is saturated, but even so there seems to be an alarming rate of bridge failures due to ground movement in that part of the world.
We've had about 6 inches of rain in March (measured about 12 miles from there) that's about 3 times average, and a lot in the past week.

River levels respond to the catchment areas in the Cotswolds mostly - would take a few days to get to Nuneham after periods of heavy rain. Friday was extremely wet (Gloucester/Oxfordshire borders were like rivers on the roads!) so 2-3 days response in river levels is about right.
 
Last edited:

Oxfordblues

Member
Joined
22 Dec 2013
Messages
670
It's a pity as I was hoping to get the 08:16 from Oxford tomorrow to connect with the 11:19 Wareham-Swanage DMU.
 

SouthEastBuses

On Moderation
Joined
15 Nov 2019
Messages
1,800
Location
uk
News on Twitter that there are problems with Nuneham Viaduct leading to the line between Oxford and Didcot being closed

This explains why I had to get a rail replacement bus from Oxford to Didcot Parkway yesterday then.
 

Mikey C

Established Member
Joined
11 Feb 2013
Messages
6,888
Don't tell the DfT that don't they want the Class 68s / Mark IIIs removed?
For the time being, the only rail connection between Oxford and London is on the Chiltern route. If this is going to take weeks to resolve, increasing capacity on trains to Marylebone will surely be essential, especially with replacement buses being hard to source at the moment.
 

SouthEastBuses

On Moderation
Joined
15 Nov 2019
Messages
1,800
Location
uk
We've had about 6 inches of rain in March (measured about 12 miles from there) that's about 3 times average, and a lot in the past week.

River levels respond to the catchment areas in the Cotswolds mostly - would take a few days to get to Nuneham after periods of heavy rain. Friday was extremely wet (Gloucester/Oxfordshire borders were like rivers on the roads!) so 2-3 days response in river levels is about right.

So wet that my train at Swindon was delayed by about 15 minutes because of flooding between Chippenham and Swindon!

For the time being, the only rail connection between Oxford and London is on the Chiltern route. If this is going to take weeks to resolve, increasing capacity on trains to Marylebone will surely be essential, especially with replacement buses being hard to source at the moment.

I agree
 

zwk500

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Jan 2020
Messages
13,560
Location
Bristol
European interoperability requirement was what I meant, just couldn't remember the word interoperability when I wrote the comment.
Right now I'm with you.
If it had been built rather than being built it could be used for diversion. I now realise the problem is south of Oxford.
Yes, in this instance it wouldn't have helped at all.
 

swt_passenger

Veteran Member
Joined
7 Apr 2010
Messages
31,531
This explains why I had to get a rail replacement bus from Oxford to Didcot Parkway yesterday then.
No, I believe that was planned Engineering work. This problem, ie the sudden closure, happened today, after the route was open for a few hours this morning.
 

Kite159

Veteran Member
Joined
27 Jan 2014
Messages
19,349
Location
West of Andover
The viaduct isn't in a good location for access from road either, bit isolated looking at the map and no doubt some of the ground will be waterlogged
 

fgwrich

Established Member
Joined
15 Apr 2009
Messages
9,314
Location
Between Edinburgh and Exeter
The viaduct isn't in a good location for access from road either, bit isolated looking at the map and no doubt some of the ground will be waterlogged
Could mean equipment having to be bought in by the riverbank then - as long as there's a suitable loading point further along the Thames.
 

D6130

Established Member
Joined
12 Jan 2021
Messages
5,875
Location
West Yorkshire/Tuscany
In the circumstances it's just as well that Didcot-Oxford hasn't been electrified yet....otherwise it could have been an even more complicated job.
 

TurboMan

Member
Joined
5 Apr 2022
Messages
327
Location
UK
Looking at the report on South Today this evening, and the photo as shared above, I wonder if one of the Girders has dropped as well as the wing wall collapse. Either way, this is going to take longer than a few weeks to fix.

First item is Paul Cliftons report - Available for 24 hours from 18:30

I managed to grab a screenshot from that. I know the effect will be exaggerated a little by the camera zoom, but - having driven over it many times since the speed restriction was introduced - it's really obvious that one span is dipping, as I mentioned in an earlier post.

The viaduct isn't in a good location for access from road either, bit isolated looking at the map and no doubt some of the ground will be waterlogged
A temporary roadway has begun to appear over the last few weeks adjacent to and on the west side of the railway south of the river.
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20230403-231534_Chrome Beta.jpg
    Screenshot_20230403-231534_Chrome Beta.jpg
    843.4 KB · Views: 629

D6130

Established Member
Joined
12 Jan 2021
Messages
5,875
Location
West Yorkshire/Tuscany
I know the effect will be exaggerated a little by the camera zoom, but - having driven over it many times since the speed restriction was introduced - it's really obvious that one span is dipping, as I mentioned in an earlier post.
It's also really obvious that maintenance of the structure - and particularly painting - has been somewhat lacking in recent years and the girders seem to be suffering from considerable corrosion. While not strictly relevant to the current problem, it does make you wonder about Network Rail's maintenance regime.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top