Travelling of any sort is tiring.What is exhausting about sitting on a train?
Travelling of any sort is tiring.What is exhausting about sitting on a train?
Travelling of any sort is tiring.
To add my two'pennorth worth I have travelled up by train on business from London to Glasgow and back in a single day for an essential client site visit. Got a taxi from home to Euston, then first direct train of the day and after boarding slept until Preston when it started to get light then started work on my laptop. On the way back - late afternoon train with plenty of uninterrupted concentration time at a table seat in standard class then a glass or two of wine as evening set in. On subsequent visits spread over several days I also preferred rail over air. Flying can be superficially quicker but the journey is much more chopped up into segments with disruption when changing from one to the next. Each to their own but personally I do believe rail is feasible for longer business journeys.
I've done London to Glasgow by train for business but last year I was asked to run a training course in Glasgow at the last minute for a colleague who had got covid. I agreed on the proviso I could be back in London by 18:00 as I was meeting some forum members for dinner near Euston.Yes I’ve done similar, and was absolutely broken by the end of it. It comes down to individual requirements of the journey, and origin destination. I prefer to use the train for London - Scotland, but sometimes I have had to fly. On one occasion some years ago I had to have a meeting at London Bridge over lunchtime, and also had to be at Edinburgh Waverley to meet colleagues by 1730. IIRC I left the office around 1400, was in the departure lounge at City airport 40 minutes later, and airborne before 1530. Jumped on the tram the other end and I was at Waverley about half an hour early.
A 5 hour rail journey after work, is 5 hours of work eating into my personal time.
It's 5 hours not spent with family, not spent with friends, not on the golf course on these long summer evenings, or simply not pottering in the garden.
Be more French! As contributors encourage upthread. Close the laptop at 17:00
That is hilarious, thanks for sharingI was in the Western Region Control office at 125 House in Swindon one day when someone pointed-out a large shiny-black car in the car-park below with a uniformed chauffeur waiting beside it. I was told it belonged to the Chairman of Railtrack who was visiting from London. Apparently he hated travelling by train for fear he'd be recognised and harangued by irate fellow-passengers!
I was told it belonged to the Chairman of Railtrack who was visiting from London. Apparently he hated travelling by train for fear he'd be recognised and harangued by irate fellow-passengers!
Or indeed ask the question with the last two words removed!The news agency would be better off doing a survey of how many of its employees read a newspaper.
Well, you probably would, wouldn't you?He went most places by his chauffeur driven car.
The idea that all people who fly on business being all senior execs with 'snouts in the trough' is wide of the mark.
I've flown a few times for business, mainly Luton to Glasgow and Luton/Birmingham to Belfast. No business class available. On both routes I'd say the majority of people flying on those planes were making business trips. I saw many of the same people later the same day on the flight home. It's often people who need to make physical visits rather than using Teams or Zoom. The vast majority are 'normal' people - decent jobs but in many cases probably not earning any more than a train driver.
The regulars clearly know the drill - 07:00 departure so gate closes at 06:30. Arrive at the airport about 06:15 straight through security (absolutely no faffing with families, stag parties or leisure travel on thise flights). Hand luggage only - remember to take the laptop out of the rucsack when going through security. Many carrying PPE for site visits.
On one of the flights I took to Glasgow I was travelling with a couple of colleagues who were not at experienced when it came to business travel. The flight was at 07:30 and they wanted to meet at the airport at 05:30 for breakfast. I refused and said I'd meet them at the gate at 07:15. They were shocked at my attitude.The funny thing is I've fallen down down a bit of YouTube rabbit hole this week and become slightly addicted to watching the late 90s/early 00s 'Airline' series from ITV (Basically follows the operations of EasyJet), amazing how many of the business people with 'critical super important cannot be late under any circumstances' meetings turn up late and expect the plane to wait for them!
One of my favourite moments so far is the woman in this episode who just sat in a coffee shop rather than bothering to head for her flight and the narrator with the line 'Susie has tried to find a more sympathetic ear...instead she's found Jane Boulton'
No it hasn't. There are so many loopholes in the rule that it's essentially meaningless, only affecting less than a dozen flights a day from Orly.France has had a ban on short-haul domestic flights since May.
Which is quite sensible as business class on short flights nowadays just means a slightly less terrible on-board meal and maybe a blocked middle seat.Most private sector businesses also don't allow business class for short flights except for the most senior people
Next year I am planning a trip to Torridon (Scotland) and after recent experience, driving that distance sounds like a masochistic method of torture even with breaking the journey. What would be best, train or sleeper to Inverness and a train towards Achnasheen (bringing a bike with me) or flying to Inverness and hiring a car (hiring a car for a week might be comparable to the cost of the sleeper)?
Clearly not all rail senior management fly everywhere - I spotted Peter Hendy getting the train somewhere after he attended Rail Live last month (several times in fact, he was doing the same journey as me!).
On one of the flights I took to Glasgow I was travelling with a couple of colleagues who were not at experienced when it came to business travel. The flight was at 07:30 and they wanted to meet at the airport at 05:30 for breakfast. I refused and said I'd meet them at the gate at 07:15. They were shocked at my attitude.
I had the last laugh when I arrived at 07:15 - they'd struggled to find anywhere serving breakfast at 05:30 and were moaning about their lack of sleep all day!
It was Luton and we were on the 07:30 Easyjet to Glasgow.I take it this wasn't from an Airport with a BA Lounge ? most of them are open around 5.30/6.00am serving breakfast better than that found onboard or indeed on a Train ?
I was doing just that at GLA on Saturday Morning around 6am.
50 air tickets a week - mostly international - is a tiny amount for an organisation of over 40,000 people.The first question of course is why are they even travelling?
What exactly is the nature of this business that requires them to be at a certain place at a certain time, and presumably at short notice? In person attendance at international conferences is understandable, as is the fact international travel is only really feasible by air. But for everything else, what the hell?
It would of course hardly be a surprise to learn that a government owned company under huge budgetary pressure was never allowed to invest in the technology that makes such travel redundant.
You cannot do everything remotely. Outside of things like site visits you need to build relationships with people you work with, your stakeholders including suppliers and customers. It's important to get 'out and about' to see what's actually happening on the ground.The first question of course is why are they even travelling?
What exactly is the nature of this business that requires them to be at a certain place at a certain time, and presumably at short notice? In person attendance at international conferences is understandable, as is the fact international travel is only really feasible by air. But for everything else, what the hell?
It would of course hardly be a surprise to learn that a government owned company under huge budgetary pressure was never allowed to invest in the technology that makes such travel redundant.