Bletchleyite
Veteran Member
The customer satisfaction surveys show GA to be anything but well run.
No commuter operator is ever going to be popular, simply because commuting is grim and always will be.
The customer satisfaction surveys show GA to be anything but well run.
No commuter operator is ever going to be popular, simply because commuting is grim and always will be.
Of course, if the contributors to this forum were in charge then everything would be perfect, because it really is that easy...
RailGourmet weren't running the trolley.
Table service was very good.
But not Flying Scotsman. Banned!We'd all be driving round in deltics and kettles!
I know, its just an example of gateline policyAbellio don't manage Stoke-on-Trent station.
I certainly havn't noticed that to be the case at Derby. It's very rare for the barriers to be open, they are usually operational and staffed until 9pm each evening.
Well IMO, FGW before the GWR rebrand set the bar, and I'd say they were a far superior operator than EMT.
EMTs intercity service, feels a bit like XC, and not a premier one like GWR etc.
Hopefully the stock gets a refresh, and a proper buffet under Abellio
I think FGW dropped the ball when they got rid of the travelling chef. Losing a first class carriage has also made such fares much higher, which would make it difficult to take advantage of what options there are. Not sure how the new trains have affected this though.
Abellio could probably do with improving catering for standard class passengers (GC manage it, so it can be done), however the current first class offering is still very good. Infact, the menu has just been refreshed with more options such as baked potatoes.
They certainly seem to employ a lot of people at University whose only job seems to be to bark orders at passengers.This my experience too.
Regarding Abellio, the major station managed by them which I use most is Norwich, and I can't ever remember finding the barriers there unmanned; right pain when you want to grab a quick coffee between trains!
I suspect the issue is to do with the fact that University is a station that has far outgrown its humble size! 3.5m passengers at the last year's count, for a station with a tiny booking hall, narrow overbridge, narrow pedestrian access, and narrow, relatively short platforms (with staircases at the ends not helping things) - the result is entirely foreseeable.They certainly seem to employ a lot of people at University whose only job seems to be to bark orders at passengers.
I don't want to go off topic, but GWR still have the daytime catering (Pullman service)
Losing the First class carriage was the right call, because it increased capacity for Standard class, which was definitely needed.
Well I don't know of such luxuries, I can only afford pleb class.
But not Flying Scotsman. Banned!
The pullman service is all well and good, but its a bit pricey if you just want a meal.
In terms of first class provision, they could have relieved overcrowding in standard by enticing people into first with cheaper fares.
I usually travel in steerage, however EMT is one of the few services where the price differential and increased comfort make it worthwile to pay for the upgrade. Whether this remains the case when the HST's and their armchairs are withdrawn, remains to be seen.
Doesn't really work for people on season ticket holders.
GWR were doing this to an extent, but it devalued the first class product.
Anyway it's a non issue, since it's very rare to see first class full, even with 1.5 coaches.
I doubt there are many season ticket holders from London to Cornwall.
But there are plenty from London to Bristol, Stroud, Moreton-in-Marsh, Cardiff etc
But, like Virgin passengers... it's likely people don't know any different than the incumbent TOC.Again the point here is that customer satisfaction of Stagecoach is one of the highest amongst all TOCs.
But, like Virgin passengers... it's likely people don't know any different than the incumbent TOC.
Especially (and I'll say it again) (from what I understand) not much changed from National Express.
It is because they are competent at delivering a service, not because the are incumbent, Stagecoach and Virgin deliver a dependable service in a sea of dross. Abellio have lots of franchises and the customer satisfaction on all of them is poor and dropping. Their record of actually delivering a train service at a basic level is poor.
If anyone thinks that Abellio are the ones likely to improve or modernise/revolutionise things they are sadly misguided. They might paint the trains a pretty colour and kit their staff out with trendy gear and new gadgets! but that is about it! There is competent, there is incompetent and then there is Abellio.
Sadly if you want a train the gets you somewhere reliably and on-time they are not the operator of choice. Unfortunately on some local lines in the Midlands we have a choice of Abellio or Abellio now, terrible for the customer.
I travel from Stoke to Crewe everyday and have a choice of EMT or London Northwestern, I know which one I would rather travel on every time even given the fact that much hasn't changed since National Express. London Northwestern train also decide to completely divert away from Stoke on a very frequent basis. I have on numerous occasions be dispatched at a random station near London with 'Technical Issues' too.
You've picked a bit of an unfortunate route to compare really though given EMT themselves freely admit the 153 operated Derby to Crewe line is an embarrassment.
If anyone thinks that Abellio are the ones likely to improve or modernise/revolutionise things they are sadly misguided.
Well an entire fleet replacement, right across the board with an end to the antiquated Sprinters and brand, spanking new ac capable stock on the MML sounds pretty revolutionary to me! Maybe us East Midlanders just set our sights too low?
Abellios track record of delivering 'new trains' isn't glowing.
Also completely pointless if the shiny new train is dirty and late or cancelled like most Abellio services though. And if the staff are managed by people who could organise a drinking session in an ale house!
I would be more convinced if they didn't make such a hash of every other franchise they are currently running. Look at the threads on issues with London NorthWestern, Scot Rail and Great Anglia.
Id rather sit on an old train that arrives than any Abellio nonsense. Now I have no choice I am forced to endure Abellio's incompetence which ever way I go, this is my issue.
For "most" trains to be cancelled or late would require punctuality figures of under 50%, which is clearly not the case.
I would love to know where all your bitterness, leading to absurd exaggeration about Abellio, comes from. You joined a month ago and practically every one of your post is a moan about Abellio. I'm going to guess it's the usual reason...
Have you considered the causes of cancellations and delays? Many of them might be out of Abellio's control, such as (on the GEML until fairly recently) ancient overhead line equipment that dated from the 1940s (which, until replacement, would sag in the heat as it wasn't auto-tensioned with weights/springs etc.)I never said it was! I said most of the trains I travel on are late.
Give me some data to suggest they are doing a good job then? What is the usual reason? Hate of incompetent TOCs? 65% of trains arrived on time last month 2.5% were cancelled, pretty poor by any standard that's on one franchise.
What is the love for this Dutch state run operator that delivers very little? They are a bad TOC and DfT keep giving them more. Odd.
I will say no more and hope they can prove me wrong.