• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

GWR Class 800

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

samuelmorris

Established Member
Joined
18 Jul 2013
Messages
5,121
Location
Brentwood, Essex
1a85 running with two engines out and losing time I notice. Not the end of the world right now but I hope they sort this out come December
It really didn't lose much time at all though, the only real delay was accrued sitting stationary at Par, and the time was soon made up, well before the electrified section I think?
 

Dren Ahmeti

Member
Joined
17 Oct 2017
Messages
550
Location
Bristol
On the flip side..class 802s in electric mode setting faster journey times. On GWRs last HST day, the 16.03 to Plymouth IET quietly set a 21min 40 second time from Paddington to Reading start to stop. Current fastest HST time in Railway performance society archives since 2008 is 22min 49sec. Pre Ladborke Grove remodelling slowdown - the fastest HST time was 20min 46sec.
Due to the way ATP conflicts with a faster approach into the DM/DML (Platforms 8 and 9) platforms at Reading, the flashing yellows into Platform 7 offer a much faster approach - coincidentally, I’ve recorded 21 minutes start to stop on a PAD-RDG before; unachievable on a HST!
 
Last edited:

JN114

Established Member
Joined
28 Jun 2005
Messages
3,355
Due to the way ATP conflicts with a faster approach into the DM/DML (Platforms 8 and 9) platforms at Reading, the splitting distants into Platform 7 offer a much faster approach - coincidentally, I’ve recorded 21 minutes start to stop on a PAD-RDG before; unachievable on a HST!

There are no splitting distants for the approach to Reading Platform 7; and they would benefit platforms 7, 8 and 9 equally.
 

Dren Ahmeti

Member
Joined
17 Oct 2017
Messages
550
Location
Bristol
There are no splitting distants for the approach to Reading Platform 7; and they would benefit platforms 7, 8 and 9 equally.
Oops! You have my brain to thank for that error; correct me if I’m wrong, but both the approaches to 7 and 8 are controlled by a flashing yellow sequence, which seems to allow a higher approach speed than the regular four-aspect into 9.
 

-Colly405-

Member
Joined
25 May 2018
Messages
641
Location
Stoke Gifford
The 800/3s have the newer moquette
Not all. I was on 800306 tonight and it had the old moquette.

Also, and this may not be popular, but I was in First Class earlier on 800308, and I have to say that whilst the seats may not be leather, the general feeling amongst some 'normals' I overheard was that they thought the 800s were perfectly acceptable replacements for the 125s.
And the Pullman breakfast is just as nice ;)
 

irish_rail

Established Member
Joined
30 Oct 2013
Messages
3,884
Location
Plymouth
Due to the way ATP conflicts with a faster approach into the DM/DML (Platforms 8 and 9) platforms at Reading, the splitting distants into Platform 7 offer a much faster approach - coincidentally, I’ve recorded 21 minutes start to stop on a PAD-RDG before; unachievable on a HST!
Not really platform 7 requires drivers to slow to 15mph half way along the platform due to ATP and the signal being 99 percent red at the end of the platform so id say 8 or more likely 9 are best bet for a quicker time definitely not 7.
 

Elshad

Member
Joined
23 Oct 2018
Messages
58
Location
London
Will the 800s ever get painted properly? Or are they stuck with the green vinyl forever? I've noticed that the painted 802s look much better, without the random white gaps around panels etc.
 

59CosG95

Established Member
Joined
18 Aug 2013
Messages
6,495
Location
Between Peterborough & Bedlington
Will the 800s ever get painted properly? Or are they stuck with the green vinyl forever? I've noticed that the painted 802s look much better, without the random white gaps around panels etc.
The 800/3s are painted; they were delivered in GWR Green from new.
As for the 800/0s, I suspect they'll keep the vinyls until their mid-life overhaul.
 

387star

On Moderation
Joined
16 Nov 2009
Messages
6,655
Has a remedy been found to protect the aisle side armrests or will they continue to be bashed by the trolley
 

Melancholia

Member
Joined
21 May 2016
Messages
498
Location
Argleton
Question, have 9 car IET coach letters been changed? There's a few I've seen run with coaches (A B C D G H J K L), instead of the usual (A B C F G H J K L)...
 

FGW_DID

Established Member
Joined
23 Jun 2011
Messages
2,729
Location
81E
Question, have 9 car IET coach letters been changed? There's a few I've seen run with coaches (A B C D G H J K L), instead of the usual (A B C F G H J K L)...

I believe they must have, I have seen a traincrew brief about having to manually change F to D, should the reservation data not load, so as all passenger reservations match. I think this only came into effect on Sunday (19th)
 

Mintona

Established Member
Joined
8 Jan 2006
Messages
3,592
Location
South West
I believe they must have, I have seen a traincrew brief about having to manually change F to D, should the reservation data not load, so as all passenger reservations match. I think this only came into effect on Sunday (19th)

I believe it’s the other way around, the software update has added a Coach D to 9 car IETs and train crew are to edit it manually back to Coach F. Unless I misread it, it’s not really my area of expertise.
 

Thatcham Xing

Member
Joined
1 Nov 2016
Messages
173
Great to have IET's on the Paddington Bedwyn's now, but not so great on the 1K15 when I got to Reading this morning and the doors couldn't be opened. Took about 15 mins to get 1 door at the rear of the train open. Puzzled looks from passengers waiting to get on and exasperation from (some of) those trying to get off. Service was terminated.

Paddington service on adjacent platform was held for a few mins to get us on.

At one point TM (yes there appeared to be one, on what I understood was to be a DOO service?) made an announcement that they were having to go up and down the train checking circuit breakers.
 

spark001uk

Established Member
Joined
20 Aug 2010
Messages
2,325
Does anyone have a piccy to share of this camera deflector mod at all?
Also, is the plan to fit them to all iet regardless of class/subclass? I'm assuming so, if it's an improvement.
 

JN114

Established Member
Joined
28 Jun 2005
Messages
3,355
Train Managers now required and rostered on all IET services on the B&H until December TT change. East of Reading they can run DOO but only calling at certain stations.
 

bastien

Member
Joined
14 Aug 2016
Messages
427
Apologies if it's buried in this thread somewhere, but what is the power output of a 5 and 9 car set on electric?
 

samuelmorris

Established Member
Joined
18 Jul 2013
Messages
5,121
Location
Brentwood, Essex
Apologies if it's buried in this thread somewhere, but what is the power output of a 5 and 9 car set on electric?
This is going back a while so I could be wrong but I thought I heard it at 900kW per powered vehicle (i.e. 225kW per traction motor), so 2700kW (3620hp) for a 5-car, 4500kW (6030hp) for a 9-car.
 

FGW_DID

Established Member
Joined
23 Jun 2011
Messages
2,729
Location
81E
I believe it’s the other way around, the software update has added a Coach D to 9 car IETs and train crew are to edit it manually back to Coach F. Unless I misread it, it’s not really my area of expertise.

You got me wondering now, so had to go and reread it.
It should be D but if the reservations fail to load and Coach F is still displayed, then traincrew have to manually change to D

From Sunday 19 May traincrew may be required to
manually re letter 9 car formations from coach F to D on
the TMS if the set does not load the SRS file
 

Mintona

Established Member
Joined
8 Jan 2006
Messages
3,592
Location
South West
You got me wondering now, so had to go and reread it.
It should be D but if the reservations fail to load and Coach F is still displayed, then traincrew have to manually change to D

I’ve just reread it myself and see you’re correct. It seems strange though as the publicly available seat plans still list Coach F rather than Coach D.
 

irish_rail

Established Member
Joined
30 Oct 2013
Messages
3,884
Location
Plymouth
1a96 38 late off Plymouth as 5 car coming in from Penzance wouldn't couple to the 5 at Plymouth. Went forward eventually as a 5 car set extremely full and standing , would imagine people won't be able to board later in the journey.
This kind of thing is happening too much and it really is about time either Hitachi sorted the coupling issues out or GWR admit defeat and use the 9 cars on the Penzance route and leave the 5 and 10s for the shorter runs....
 

FGW_DID

Established Member
Joined
23 Jun 2011
Messages
2,729
Location
81E
Seems to be happening an awful lot at Plymouth, is it the trains or something at Plymouth?
 

83G/84D

Established Member
Joined
28 Oct 2011
Messages
5,960
Location
Cornwall
Seems to be happening an awful lot at Plymouth, is it the trains or something at Plymouth?

Unclear what is causing the issues which seem to be in Platform 7 mainly. Track and trains have been investigated but no conclusive proof as to what the problem is afaik.
 

irish_rail

Established Member
Joined
30 Oct 2013
Messages
3,884
Location
Plymouth
Well today apparently couldn't get the nose cone to open in one of the units so unlikely to be infrastructure related
 

aar0

Member
Joined
13 Sep 2016
Messages
302
Approaching London on the 1129 from Swansea, I'm in coach H, and the next functioning toilet is in K. None working aft of H either. There's also a non-functional external door on H.

On the plus side the driver's clearly in a good mood as we've had some excellent runs before being caught by signals to get back to the timetable! Just hate the seats...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top