dk1
Veteran Member
Superb throughout.Probably a silly question, but how good is the air conditioning on these units?
Superb throughout.Probably a silly question, but how good is the air conditioning on these units?
Superb throughout.
Good as it gets very hot in East Anglia. But also extremely cold in winter. Very European climate in comparison with points west. One thing that tempts me to move there.
Just wondering - Given the better feedback wouldn't the 755's have been a more suitable replacement for GWR HST's than the Hitachi 800's?
Flirts can be built in a 200km/h version - but IIRC Stadler were offering the smile as a hybrid for the midlands (which can go up to 250km/h), so either way - would work. Where to put the generators is indeed a problem though.Top speed is lower and you'd need multiple thrash cupboards per unit... You could put them at either end of of the train as a separate vehicle and put a cab on them.... Ah... Wait... Hasn't that been done?
(For reference to those not familiar with Stadler products, the "SMILE" stands for "Schneller Mehrsystemfähiger Innovativer Leichter Expresszug", or "speedy, multi-system, innovative, lightweight express train". Only one example is in service currently, this being the SBB RABe 501.)Flirts can be built in a 200km/h version - but IIRC Stadler were offering the smile as a hybrid for the midlands (which can go up to 250km/h), so either way - would work. Where to put the generators is indeed a problem though.
Do we have a source for them offering this?Flirts can be built in a 200km/h version - but IIRC Stadler were offering the smile as a hybrid for the midlands (which can go up to 250km/h), so either way - would work. Where to put the generators is indeed a problem though.
Flirt 200km/h: NSB 74/75/76 (of which the last one will be bi-mode, but aren't built yet, limited to 160km/h on diesel): https://www.stadlerrail.com/media/pdf/fnor0919e.pdfDo we have a source for them offering this?
Interesting, thanks.Flirt 200km/h: NSB 74/75/76 (of which the last one will be bi-mode, but aren't built yet, limited to 160km/h on diesel): https://www.stadlerrail.com/media/pdf/fnor0919e.pdf
Smile UK:
- Some posts on this forum, but you'll have to search for that.
- Confirmed as a lost bid in https://www.stadlerrail.com/media/pdf/2020_0305_fachmedienpräsentation_final.pdf (search for Midlands)
Something like 24 I think. Difficult to say as unlike previous DMUs some of these have to swap over during the day for refuelling.How many of the 38 units are being diagrammed daily?
Completely level boarding at all the platforms I've used. Before the door opens, a piece of floor slides out, makes contact with the platform edge and then retracts about half a centimetre so there is essentially no gap.Level Boarding. What is the level boarding experience of these units? It is clearly near level and thus easier to board than higher floor units, but how level? What if is the height difference? Is there much of a gap between the car floor and the platform edge? Do wheelchair users need to book in advance or is it turn up and go?
The use of a ramp is pretty much extinct in these parts nowadays.Level Boarding. What is the level boarding experience of these units? It is clearly near level and thus easier to board than higher floor units, but how level? What if is the height difference? Is there much of a gap between the car floor and the platform edge? Do wheelchair users need to book in advance or is it turn up and go?
Are more wheelchair users and families with pushchairs and buggies using the service - this question may of course not be applicable or determinable at the moment due to COVID?
If the ramp fails then the doors are locked out of use.Presumably the platform ramps are for when the onboard ramps fail?
If the ramp fails then the doors are locked out of use.
Probably as some gaps still exist. We have also had those that for some reason are unsure about the retracting step and request a ramp. Luckily the superior acceleration can claw back the delay then incurred.Ah right. Does seem very pointless having the aforementioned platform based ramps then
An example of this can be seen in this tweet: https://twitter.com/speedysticks007/status/1285888731694739459?s=21You occasionally get the odd ramp that doesn't line up with edge quite as well due to the platform, not the train.
Even then it's still pretty level
Only on Platform five at Peterborough which is a bit low. The GA Ipswich trains very rarely use this this platform, Normally uses platform six.Cheers, couldn't find any images to illustrate. That Peterborough one looks like it could potentially cause damage!
That thing hanging off the bottom is (I think) there to detect obstacles and prevent damage. Haven't actually seen this documented, but that's how I've observed it working.Cheers, couldn't find any images to illustrate. That Peterborough one looks like it could potentially cause damage!
As far as I know, they will not be working from Liverpool Street for the foreseeable future.When they do start working from Liv St what services will they be working, and roughly how many per day
That thing hanging off the bottom is (I think) there to detect obstacles and prevent damage. Haven't actually seen this documented, but that's how I've observed it working.
Until travelling on the trains, I hadn't realised that the actual walk-through was level over the bogies, and that it is just the sides beneath the seats which have raised floors; if it is possible to establish a level walkway over the centres of the bogies, why is it necessary to raise the floor levels on either side?
I noticed that when standing in platforms 1 - 5 in Norwich, the diesel engines were switched off and the pantographs raised; is that normal?