• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Alliance Rail (GNWR) gets Network Rail approval

Status
Not open for further replies.

Iskra

Established Member
Joined
11 Jun 2014
Messages
7,983
Location
West Riding
Direct London services from Dewsbury and Huddersfield seem a bit pointless if it's quicker via Leeds due to many stops. I suppose people may prefer not changing though. This route almost provides a bit of a cross-country service between West Yorkshire and the West Midlands. It looks like a decent service frequency too.

I think this has broken into Euston by the fact the routes abstract a little from many operators rather than a lot from one operator. The West Yorks route abstracts from Northern, TPE, Virgin and London Midland.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Suraggu

Member
Joined
23 Oct 2013
Messages
964
Location
The Far North
It still needs the approval of the ORR but this news is a positive step for Competition on the West Coast.
IM sure Beardy will be moaning to the papers so he gets the sympathy vote.
 

Bantamzen

Established Member
Joined
4 Dec 2013
Messages
9,756
Location
Baildon, West Yorkshire
Interestingly it seems that Alliance haven't totally given up on the Bradford / Calder Valley services:

http://www.alliancerail.co.uk/2014/...ndon-direct-rail-services-move-a-step-closer/

Ian Yeowart continued: “Disappointingly not all our services are deliverable at the moment, but we will continue to engage with Network Rail to try and secure the capacity we need to address the issue in the future. A similar situation was faced by sister company Grand Central in 2006 when it began services to Sunderland from an application that included Sunderland and Bradford. Despite being rejected at the time, Bradford services began three years later ”

Although to be fair, they are also perusing more Bradford bound services via the ECML, so they have more eggs in their basket and will be buoyed by their initial success on securing an agreement for access to the WCML.

http://www.alliancerail.co.uk/2014/...yorkshire-cleethorpes-and-london-kings-cross/
 

Hellfire

Member
Joined
14 Dec 2012
Messages
552
London to Preston currently takes around two hours ten minutes doesn't it?

Fastest London to Preston is 2 hours. That's non-stop.

Factoring in stops at Warrington BQ and Wigan, which the majority of services do, adds a further 8 minutes.
 

northwichcat

Veteran Member
Joined
23 Jan 2009
Messages
32,693
Location
Northwich
One morning peak service terminates at Oxford Road and it returns northwards as a service to Windermere.

There's also an evening peak Oxford Road - Windermere service the unit does an ECS run from the Airport to Oxford Road and then sits at Oxford Rd for quite a while.
 

NotATrainspott

Established Member
Joined
2 Feb 2013
Messages
3,224
If the 'Alstom-GB-tilting-train-with-23m-carriages-and-ONIX-traction-package' production line is to reopen I hope the DfT considers ordering carriages to make all the remaining 9-car Pendolinos into 11-car. To the best of my knowledge a lot of the safety regulation changes were for the driver's cab so the carriages themselves might not have to be particularly different.
 

northwichcat

Veteran Member
Joined
23 Jan 2009
Messages
32,693
Location
Northwich
Direct London services from Dewsbury and Huddersfield seem a bit pointless if it's quicker via Leeds due to many stops. I suppose people may prefer not changing though. This route almost provides a bit of a cross-country service between West Yorkshire and the West Midlands. It looks like a decent service frequency too.

I think this has broken into Euston by the fact the routes abstract a little from many operators rather than a lot from one operator. The West Yorks route abstracts from Northern, TPE, Virgin and London Midland.

Currently Huddersfield-Kings Cross takes around 3 hours with a change and the risk that if you miss your connection it'll take longer. Huddersfield-Euston via Warrington should take around 2 hr 30 with no risk of a missed connection. The proposed service will also open new journey opportunities by providing a direct link between Crewe and West Yorkshire.

I wonder if the plans will affect the proposal for Liverpool-Victoria-Newcastle to be half-hourly.
 

DarloRich

Veteran Member
Joined
12 Oct 2010
Messages
29,325
Location
Fenny Stratford
The only way you'll achieve that though is either increasing journey times to London from places further north or deleting calls from other stations which receive the current IC services - which would probably mean Watford Junction, Rugby and potentially Nuneaton / Tamworth losing out.

Sorry - MK getting more IC calls isn't going to happen.

Sorry but that is exactly what will happen.

Revenue will be higher by stopping at MK than, say, Tamworth so Tamworth or Nuneaton or Rugby will simply be cut as an intercity station. A harsh fact of the current economic climate. Once the E-W connection is in place MK will become a larger interchange and attract more passengers, especially in the peaks. Coupled with the intensive lobbying from the local authority and the continued growth of the town I can easily see all intercity services stopping there quite soon.
 

Class 170101

Established Member
Joined
1 Mar 2014
Messages
7,955
The latter most probably since 390s aren't compliment to current crash standards

How is that? Those things are lard butts. Look what happened to the one at Grayrigg and how many people died.
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
Will be interesting to know what has changed since Virgin were told no to Shrewsbury via Stafford..

I don't think Virgin were serious about Shrewsbury given the way they went about it. If they were serious about Shrewsbury they could have extended one of the West Midlands services to Shrewsbury rather than create a new train from Shrewsbury to Euston.
 

gordonthemoron

Established Member
Joined
4 Sep 2006
Messages
6,595
Location
Milton Keynes
Sorry but that is exactly what will happen.

Revenue will be higher by stopping at MK than, say, Tamworth so Tamworth or Nuneaton or Rugby will simply be cut as an intercity station. A harsh fact of the current economic climate. Once the E-W connection is in place MK will become a larger interchange and attract more passengers, especially in the peaks. Coupled with the intensive lobbying from the local authority and the continued growth of the town I can easily see all intercity services stopping there quite soon.

Just like Reading then, as it should be
 

kylemore

Member
Joined
28 Aug 2010
Messages
1,046
Just a thought - since the Windermere branch is to be electrified is there any market for a direct Euston - Windermere train?
Perhaps running only at weekends initially say out on Friday late afternoon and back on Sunday afternoon/early eve. You could even have inclusive weekend break packages with hotels.
Would the platform at Windermere accomodate a 6 car Pendo?
 

Class 170101

Established Member
Joined
1 Mar 2014
Messages
7,955
Not needed it seems.
Trains will go Crewe-Warrington-Newton le Willows-Victoria-Stalybridge-Leeds (all electric by 2017/18).

Edit: Actually, when the Ordsall Curve is in (2018?) electric trains could run Crewe-Stalybridge via Stockport, Oxford Road and Victoria.

I am surprised Stockport to Stalybridge isn't being wired to be honest. Its a small stretch of line that could be useful for diversionary purposes but will be next to useless without wires.
 

Manchester77

Established Member
Joined
4 Jun 2012
Messages
2,628
Location
Manchester
How is that? Those things are lard butts. Look what happened to the one at Grayrigg and how many people died.
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---

Most trains don't meet modern regulations for cab safety think only the 380s, 377/6s and 377/7s meet them (and obviously any new trains on order meet them)
 

thealexweb

Member
Joined
5 Jan 2014
Messages
961
Just a thought - since the Windermere branch is to be electrified is there any market for a direct Euston - Windermere train?
Perhaps running only at weekends initially say out on Friday late afternoon and back on Sunday afternoon/early eve. You could even have inclusive weekend break packages with hotels.
Would the platform at Windermere accomodate a 6 car Pendo?

Looking at the Windermere platform earlier today it would be able to take a six car 185. Dunno about a Pendo though.
 

MidnightFlyer

Veteran Member
Joined
16 May 2010
Messages
12,857
Looking at the Windermere platform earlier today it would be able to take a six car 185. Dunno about a Pendo though.

p3 at Oxenholme is 139m according to the Sectional Appendix for LNW North: that's enough for 5-car of a Pendolino (using 390 measurements), but not 6.
 

whizzylizzy

Member
Joined
28 Jun 2011
Messages
19
Poulton le Flyde direct to London? Keith Harris will be happy! I sat opposite him once and I asked him where Orville was and he said in the bag on the seat next to him. Was he avoiding a ticket for the daft duck? LOL

P.S How many other Celebs would benefit from this new service?
 

infobleep

Veteran Member
Joined
27 Feb 2011
Messages
12,674
p3 at Oxenholme is 139m according to the Sectional Appendix for LNW North: that's enough for 5-car of a Pendolino (using 390 measurements), but not 6.
What would be the problem if a 6 car train stopped at a 5 car platform? Is there simply too many trains passing through to allow such a thing? I know some stations in the South East have longer trains than platforms but the frequency of trains makes it possible.

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk
 

MidnightFlyer

Veteran Member
Joined
16 May 2010
Messages
12,857
What would be the problem if a 6 car train stopped at a 5 car platform? Is there simply too many trains passing through to allow such a thing? I know some stations in the South East have longer trains than platforms but the frequency of trains makes it possible.

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

Nothing really, but it depends case by case based on the positions of signals etc usually. Judging by Google Maps (I have to be honest, I can't be bothered wading through the SA again!) there's a signal just beyond the platform end heading towards Windermere, which the train would need to stop before; and an extra coach off the end of the platform might just foul the Down Main for Carlisle, it looks tight.
 

The Planner

Veteran Member
Joined
15 Apr 2008
Messages
16,000
Oxenholme is due for a bit of a re-jig at some point so that might not be so much of an issue.
 

The Planner

Veteran Member
Joined
15 Apr 2008
Messages
16,000
Some of the crossovers get moved about and there was talk about the down loop becoming the access to the Windermere branch. Still up in the air though.
 

kylemore

Member
Joined
28 Aug 2010
Messages
1,046
Looking at the Windermere platform earlier today it would be able to take a six car 185. Dunno about a Pendo though.

p3 at Oxenholme is 139m according to the Sectional Appendix for LNW North: that's enough for 5-car of a Pendolino (using 390 measurements), but not 6.

Thanks for info - would there be any need to stop at Oxenholme since most of the punters would be heading to Windermere?
 

Hardcastle

Member
Joined
21 Dec 2013
Messages
358
Location
Preston
Would there be a demand for a direct Euston-Windermere service once a week I doubt it, as for the Cumbrian coast what would be used to operate the service which I believe would run as far as Workington.
 

driver_m

Established Member
Joined
8 Nov 2011
Messages
2,248
Currently Huddersfield-Kings Cross takes around 3 hours with a change and the risk that if you miss your connection it'll take longer. Huddersfield-Euston via Warrington should take around 2 hr 30 with no risk of a missed connection. The proposed service will also open new journey opportunities by providing a direct link between Crewe and West Yorkshire.

I wonder if the plans will affect the proposal for Liverpool-Victoria-Newcastle to be half-hourly.

I can't see it being 2h 30. Think 3+ would be more realistic. Looking at their plans they're stopping at plenty of stations. Our services (vwc) rack up the minutes if we stop at any additional stations to the usual ones. Ordsall is going to be a huge bottleneck for any service crossing it IMO not just the service you mention.
 

Starmill

Veteran Member
Joined
18 May 2012
Messages
23,399
Location
Bolton
Maybe the fact that an Open Access Operator has looked at this and decided there is insufficent demand to run this through Bolton and Chorley

Oh not this whole nonsense again. "Bolton and Chorley are noplaces, everybody travelling there is happy with a pacer and nobody wants to go beyond Victoria."

Yeah, right.
 

MidnightFlyer

Veteran Member
Joined
16 May 2010
Messages
12,857
Oh not this whole nonsense again. "Bolton and Chorley are noplaces, everybody travelling there is happy with a pacer and nobody wants to go beyond Victoria."

Yeah, right.

That obviously isn't the case though and not necessarily what Moonshot was implying either - the real question is is there enough demand to justify it on what already is going to be quite a slow trek to / ex- London?
 

Starmill

Veteran Member
Joined
18 May 2012
Messages
23,399
Location
Bolton
just a reflection of the facts.

Yach. I'm so glad we don't have an equivalent of Reading on the West Coast. If I lived in Bristol instead of Manchester all those pilers going to Reading would annoy me even more than the MK passengers do when I have the misfortune to take a train that stops there!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top