• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Avanti West Coast Rolling Stock Updates

Status
Not open for further replies.

py_megapixel

Established Member
Joined
5 Nov 2018
Messages
6,996
Location
Northern England
They would still be 125mph operations meaning no blocking the mainline
I don't understand your point. There was 125mph electric stock earmarked for those services, when they were still planned, and they even got as far as leasing and refurbishing some carriages. The only reason they are not running up and down the WCML now is Grand Central's decision to abandon the plans following Covid-19. It had nothing to do with suitability of the available rolling stock.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Efini92

Established Member
Joined
14 Dec 2016
Messages
2,002
I don't understand your point. There was 125mph electric stock earmarked for those services, when they were still planned, and they even got as far as leasing and refurbishing some carriages. The only reason they are not running up and down the WCML now is Grand Central's decision to abandon the plans following Covid-19. It had nothing to do with suitability of the available rolling stock.
I thought the plan was to use 90’s?
 

voyagerdude220

Established Member
Joined
13 Oct 2005
Messages
3,560
390125 had a fault before it could form today's 11:30 Euston to Glasgow but has since gone back into traffic.

Apparently today's 11:48 Blackpool North to London Euston was delayed at Preston due to Train Manager not having knowledge of refurbished Pendolinos- not sure if a different person worked it or they simply obtained more information?
 

Agent_Squash

Established Member
Joined
22 Jul 2016
Messages
1,245
Apparently today's 11:48 Blackpool North to London Euston was delayed at Preston due to Train Manager not having knowledge of refurbished Pendolinos- not sure if a different person worked it or they simply obtained more information?

Was the manual for the microwave misplaced?
 

Sorcerer

Established Member
Joined
20 May 2022
Messages
1,223
Location
Liverpool
So unless the service is going to be jacked up again they don't need the 10 807's as have 12 spare 390's daily ok have to allow a few on mtce but they have sufficient.
What you should bear in mind is that those 12 Pendolinos not in use won't just be stored away awaiting extra services. I remember in a video covering the unveiling of Virgin's Alstom Pendolino livery where the CEO said that Alstom provided them 47 trainsets per day. This was when the fleet consisted of 52 units. Unless practises have changed I don't think they could just whip out the spare 390s instead of ordering the new stock. Plus the 807s will enable better connectivity on Avanti's hopes for their second Liverpool services serving South Parkway station (which is something that's been in demand for quite some time) thanks to their smaller consists.
 

Trackman

Established Member
Joined
28 Feb 2013
Messages
3,616
Location
Lewisham
Was the manual for the microwave misplaced?
With the microwave oven joke put to one side for the moment:
If a TM changeover happened at Preston and they found it was a refurbed unit, I can't see them being arsey about it.

So what has changed?

The TM hidey hole looks the same (unless different software??) and I'm sure the local door panels haven't changed- that would be a red flag briefing to all.
I was going to ask the question the other day but the TM had to leave to dispatch train and never saw her again! (well apart from out of the window)
 

Nicholas Lewis

On Moderation
Joined
9 Aug 2019
Messages
7,323
Location
Surrey
What you should bear in mind is that those 12 Pendolinos not in use won't just be stored away awaiting extra services. I remember in a video covering the unveiling of Virgin's Alstom Pendolino livery where the CEO said that Alstom provided them 47 trainsets per day. This was when the fleet consisted of 52 units. Unless practises have changed I don't think they could just whip out the spare 390s instead of ordering the new stock. Plus the 807s will enable better connectivity on Avanti's hopes for their second Liverpool services serving South Parkway station (which is something that's been in demand for quite some time) thanks to their smaller consists.
If Alstom can only provide them 47 best case pretty low availability but guess tilt systems add to the mtce workload. So AWC can access 3 more units yet they don't need them and they may have aspirations for more services but can't see the DfT being interested in taking on extra leasing charges without revenue generation. Of course the new units will be deployed but i wouldn't be refurbishing all the pendos just yet. Mind you First has a track record of wasting money on refurbishments in other parts of its empire.
 

Sorcerer

Established Member
Joined
20 May 2022
Messages
1,223
Location
Liverpool
So AWC can access 3 more units yet they don't need them and they may have aspirations for more services but can't see the DfT being interested in taking on extra leasing charges without revenue generation.
If you're referring to the potential for more Liverpool services I don't see why the DfT wouldn't allow it seeing as it was one of their franchise promises (subject to approval by the ORR). I know franchise commitments probably aren't a thing anymore with franchises being scrapped, but the potential for a second Liverpool service is there, and seeing as it can be quite a busy route I don't see why not. The 807s would enable a stop at Liverpool South Parkway which the Pendolinos can't do.

Mind you First has a track record of wasting money on refurbishments in other parts of its empire.
The Class 390 refurbishment was not a waste of money. It was arguably very much needed.
 

Wapps

Member
Joined
1 Jul 2020
Messages
116
Location
London
Original plan was 91s but as they would be restricted to 110mph due to being non-tilt, it was decided to go for 90s which are more reliable and have better acceleration.
The 91s were designed for tilt, should they be used on the WCML. The MKIVs have a tilt profile, so if the cost of installing tilting equipment were proportionate they should be able to do 125+ on the WCML. Does anyone know how difficult / costly this would be?
 

fgwrich

Established Member
Joined
15 Apr 2009
Messages
9,884
Location
Hampshire
Mind you First has a track record of wasting money on refurbishments in other parts of its empire.

*Angel Trains

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

I thought they went to Bulgaria?

The only electric locos to be exported from the UK so far are a number of 86s for Bullmarket (Bulgaria) and flOyd (Hungary), 87s for Bullmarket and BZK (Bulgaria) and 92s for DB Cargo (Romania) and now Transagent Rail Croatia (Croatia).
 

43096

On Moderation
Joined
23 Nov 2015
Messages
16,934
The 91s were designed for tilt, should they be used on the WCML. The MKIVs have a tilt profile, so if the cost of installing tilting equipment were proportionate they should be able to do 125+ on the WCML. Does anyone know how difficult / costly this would be?
As I understand it the space for the tilt equipment in the 91s is no longer available after the HGR work 20 years or so ago. So, nigh on impossible and not going to happen.
 

dorsetdesiro

Member
Joined
30 Oct 2017
Messages
669
The fact AWC went with navy blue instead of teal - one of AWC's house colours - for seating fabrics could be done in advance for the transition to GBR - navy blue would be obvious - for convenience even that is quite some time away. Then the 390s may not need redoing internally all over again when the time comes?

It'll be interesting to see if EMR's 810s possibly will come with navy blue seating.
 

Carlisle

Established Member
Joined
26 Aug 2012
Messages
4,350
The fact AWC went with navy blue instead of teal - one of AWC's house colours - for seating fabrics could be done in advance for the transition to GBR
I’d be amazed if the GBR transition is currently anything remotely resembling being that well planned, but happy to be corrected.
 

Goldfish62

Veteran Member
Joined
14 Feb 2010
Messages
11,883
I’d be amazed if the GBR transition is currently anything remotely resembling being that well planned, but happy to be corrected.
Indeed. We haven't even got the draft legislation to set up GBR yet. It's years away, if ever at this rate.
 

LNW-GW Joint

Veteran Member
Joined
22 Feb 2011
Messages
21,137
Location
Mold, Clwyd
The 91s were designed for tilt, should they be used on the WCML. The MKIVs have a tilt profile, so if the cost of installing tilting equipment were proportionate they should be able to do 125+ on the WCML. Does anyone know how difficult / costly this would be?
We keep being told that the WCML south of Weaver Jn will be signed for 125mph non-tilt running for the 805/807 fleet.
So no point in attempting to fit tilt gear on 91s (which doesn't exist anyway).
Class 90s wouldn't be able to use the 125mph sections.
 

Some guy

Member
Joined
6 Feb 2022
Messages
455
Location
Preston
We keep being told that the WCML south of Weaver Jn will be signed for 125mph non-tilt running for the 805/807 fleet.
So no point in attempting to fit tilt gear on 91s (which doesn't exist anyway).
Class 90s wouldn't be able to use the 125mph sections.
It’s a bit of a dumb decision considering the south WCML is very curved especially around Tamworth and rugby. Preston to Wigan and Preston to Lancaster is straight and should also be signed off
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top