All that money spent and Blackpool north platforms look as windswept and unwelcoming as ever.in Nodrog's clip, the canopy at Blackpool, still seems to be in a scabby condition.
Could no one afford a can of paint?
You’re probably right as the Manchester – Blackpool electrification project has been one long succession of conservative estimates.Let's hope that's a conservative estimate.
The test train runs monthly. Obviously whilst the Blackpool line has been closed it hasn't run to there but has started at Carnforth instead.
That test train headed up to Scotland last Tuesday, as it always does, and the consist doesn't include MENTOR.
Thanks for adding my videos to the CV though not all my channel videos are railway/train related. I record a lot of stuff around my hometown as well. Anyone is free to watch anything of course, (I have almost 1,500 videos on my channel) I'll probably be filming around Layton Station today when I finish work if I have time.
Funnily enough, platforms 3 and 4 that Nodrog was on were closed to traffic for the last two days for painting to be carried out!!n Nodrog's clip, the canopy at Blackpool, still seems to be in a scabby condition.
Could no one afford a can of paint?
We are about to go to Bromsgrove for a couple of days, so I won't be around to see or film it, if it comes.
Dear Garry
Please see my post #6928 addressed to Lyca, immediately above this one.
Could I please ask you the same question?
I look forward to hearing from you
Dave
Did you see anything interesting whilst you were there? (If you get my drift).
It is essentially swapping routes with the remaining hourly TPE service via Warrington Central, so that can go via Victoria and reduce conflict east of Piccadilly where it currently has to cross all the tracks. Ultimately the TPE will be a bi-mode (I think) and the Northern will be a Connect sevice worked by a new 195 unit, so the net change from electric to diesel mileage is only the Airport-Piccadilly leg.from the Liverpool-Manchester electrification, where I understand (misunderstand?) that the all-electric Lime St-Manchester Airport service is to be re-routed via Warrington Central, which is unwired.
I think it reflects the booming nature of the outer West Midlands economy, with high demand from places like Great Malvern, Worcester and Droitwich as well as Bromsgrove and the Birmingham commuter belt, and the current services are overwhelmed.
There is a similar but probably smaller trend around Manchester, but not so much around Liverpool and elsewhere in the north west.
University is something else, having only opened in 1978, but has big usage of students and hospital staff/visitors (on low PTE fares).
However, it forces more trains down the West Suburban line when they (eg Hereford trains) could be using the quieter Camp Hill line.
Maybe the north west equivalent is Salford Crescent?
Liverpool South Parkway is another big growth station, now a far cry from its early "whlte elephant" days.
On the CLC route, it easily outperforms the Chat Moss route in local patronage, largely because of usage at Warrington Central (and LPY).
It is essentially swapping routes with the remaining hourly TPE service via Warrington Central, so that can go via Victoria and reduce conflict east of Piccadilly where it currently has to cross all the tracks. Ultimately the TPE will be a bi-mode (I think) and the Northern will be a Connect sevice worked by a new 195 unit, so the net change from electric to diesel mileage is only the Airport-Piccadilly leg.
There is the soon to launch Liverpool-Glasgow which wouldn't have been possible without NW electrificationnot brought eye-catching service improvements such as journey times or extra destinations, or am I being impatient?
Good to pass through Kirkham at something much faster than the former 30mph which applied at some part of the transit before the upgrade.
What a pity they deleted the idea of increasing the general line speed.
You'd think something like 85mph would have been possible on the open stretches without spending a lot of money (considering what the resignalling cost).
I reckon Liverpool-Glasgow will be great and I'll use it myself.
It is the only example of service enhancement that I know of and I salute it. Are there more coming?
But why couldn't it have been done without electrification?
I haven't looked proper distances up, but let's suppose 10 miles of the route could be upgraded to 85mph instead of 75mph. I reckon that would cut about a minute off the journey time. Unless that would have cost next to nowt (hmmm.....) then would it be worth it?
I would guess that raising the speed through Kirkham and Wesham from 30 to 60 will gain a lot more.
Background: Bromsgrove to Barnt Green is being electrified. Bromsgrove station has been resited and rebuilt with four platforms instead of two. The short stretch between the two stations is almost entirely taken up by the Lickey Incline. Wires are up but no electric services yet (I don't know if the juice is on.) New, additional, electric, services will start at Bromsgrove and continue from Barnt Green through "University" (a biggy) and Birmingham New St (second biggy) and beyond.
This may be of little direct interest to Manchester-Blackpoolites, but the hugely expanded station (four decent length platforms where some years ago it was down to one short one, under threat of closure) hugely expanded car park (already full, and new extra services haven't started yet) and intended expanded service (electrics up the Lickey Incline) could give "us" food for thought. Our friends are frequent users, they say trains arriving full and standing are normal, Tokyo tube conditions as far as University are commonplace and people are often left on the platform at Bromsgrove, unable to board.
On a sample of two trains, our outbound started from New St, off peak, with three quarters of seats occupied; our return, on the early shoulder of the peak (but inbound to Birmingham) arrived with a handful of empty seats and left full and standing.
Whether the electric services promote further patronage or just accommodate that which has already grown remains to be seen.
I'm not sure what lessons can be learned from this, or indeed from the Liverpool-Manchester electrification, where I understand (misunderstand?) that the all-electric Lime St-Manchester Airport service is to be re-routed via Warrington Central, which is unwired.
I reckon Liverpool-Glasgow will be great and I'll use it myself.
It is the only example of service enhancement that I know of and I salute it. Are there more coming?
But why couldn't it have been done without electrification?
How much faster could Kirkham have been by putting both tracks south of the island and building a new down platform on the south side?I haven't looked proper distances up, but let's suppose 10 miles of the route could be upgraded to 85mph instead of 75mph. I reckon that would cut about a minute off the journey time. Unless that would have cost next to nowt (hmmm.....) then would it be worth it?
I would guess that raising the speed through Kirkham and Wesham from 30 to 60 will gain a lot more.
Well, it's 90 from Broad Green to Astley at 22½ miles. But then it's 60, followed by only 75 to 30 miles before the crawl into Victoria begins. So only about two-thirds up to 90.Well, the Chat Moss is now 90mph, and the 4-tracking at Huyton has improved capacity.
Also the May timetable shows 50 minute off peak journey times Preston to Lime Street, which is a significant improvement. Unfortunately, peak morning services will be stoppers though.There is the soon to launch Liverpool-Glasgow which wouldn't have been possible without NW electrification