Scotrail84
Established Member
- Joined
- 5 Jul 2010
- Messages
- 2,368
92 023 was on 1C11/1B26
Yes, I have just received an email regarding my booking to Glasgow 1st week of November:Been announced elsewhere by Serco this morning that the introduction of the MK5s has been delayed again due to some issues. Lowland not expected until Spring 2019 now with the Highland to follow after.
http://newtrains.sleeper.scot/news/update-on-the-introduction-of-the-new-caledonian-sleeper-trains/
We are contacting you regarding your journey booked with us for travel on or after 28 October 2018.
Unfortunately, we are sorry to have to inform you that due to issues relating to a delay in the availability of our new trains, we will not be able to operate our new
fleet on this particular journey.
We will instead, be running our current trains and can therefore still ensure you get to your destination and experience our excellent levels of service and
hospitality on board.
If you still want to travel with us on your original booking date, you don't need to do anything else. Your booking will be automatically updated to an alternative
accommodation type on our current trains, and the tickets you have remain valid for your journey. You do not require replacement tickets.
The details of this change to your booking are below.
Your reservation will be automatically transferred to twin room accommodation for your exclusive use. We will also send you £20 per room (based on your original
booking) as a one-off gesture of goodwill. Your room reservation will remain unchanged.
However, if you wish to change or cancel your journey with us, we have two options available:
1) You can cancel your booking and we will give you a full refund, even if you did not book a flexible ticket.
2) We can re-book you on to a service when our new trains are in operation. Again, this option is available for holders of both fixed and flexible tickets.
If you choose either of the options above, then please email us by Saturday 20 October 2018 and we will be in touch.
We will also send you £20 per room (based on your original
booking) as a one-off gesture of goodwill.
However, we booked "Classic Shared" and now have "Twin Room" - what's the difference? (I've not travelled CS before)
Been announced elsewhere by Serco this morning that the introduction of the MK5s has been delayed again due to some issues. Lowland not expected until Spring 2019 now with the Highland to follow after.
http://newtrains.sleeper.scot/news/update-on-the-introduction-of-the-new-caledonian-sleeper-trains/
this is the most complex introduction of new rolling stock ever undertaken in the UK
Quite a big claim to make!
Just the same thing - only difference is the name for it between the old / new stock.
So the 90 may well end up up north Friday night then? I thought they normally run the circuit finishing at Wembley for the weekend if only one on?1C11/1B26 - 92 023
1S25 - 92 028/67 015
1A25 - 73 969
1Y11 - 73 966
1S26 - 90 046
1S25 was a skoda. Not sure if it was 046, didn’t pay close attention.
1C11/1B26 - 92 023
1S25 - 92 028/67 015
1A25 - 73 969
1Y11 - 73 966
1S26 - 90 046
92 028 worked 1S25 last night, so 1M16 tonight most likely...1S25 is 90043 tonight.
1S26 should be 92033.
90 046 went off hire back to Freightliner at Crewe Basford Hall today (replaced by 90047).1S26 - 90 046
The 90s just end up wherever they end up for the weekend provided they've sufficient days to next exam. They're planned so they're at the Wembley end if either they need an A Exam (done by FL on-site at Wembley) or need to return to Crewe for B Exam. That could be any day of the week in theory.So the 90 may well end up up north Friday night then? I thought they normally run the circuit finishing at Wembley for the weekend if only one on?
A lot has been spent on keeping the old stock going - it's 30-40 years old and life-expired, that's why coaches keep failing, not because maintenance has dropped off. A lot is being invested keeping the old stock which is well past its sell-by date running (sometimes more successfully than others). The fleet is also stretched, so taking a coach out of circulation for a "proper" repair of certain minor faults isn't always an option.Assuming they’ve known about this for a while internally, but it feels like maintenance on the older stock has taken a backseat recently.
Could make for a troublesome winter if they now need to keep this lot ticking along well until next year and catch up on work they put off never expecting to need doing.
The failures always get highlighted, but every night, six nights per week, there are up to 66 coaches being used over hundreds of miles and the vast majority of them work despite being 30-40 years old - that's not achieved through a lack of maintenance.
I know that maintenance has been going on, but that doesn't mean it's been to the level that it could have been. And as I've said before, it's not too hard to see from the state of some of the interiors that a 'keep it going for now' approach seems to be the order of the day.
I'd not question that the people actually doing the work do the best they can do with the resources made abailable to them.I'm a former Sleeper employee who was close to the coalface in managing service delivery. Trust me, there's absolutely no skimping going on. There's a huge amount of effort and money going into keeping these relics moving, and the team in charge are doing remarkably well, all things considered. Quite apart from anything else, the Mark 3s need to be returned to the leasing company in full working order, so a basic minimum standard has to be maintained. Minor cosmetic stuff sometimes has to fall by the wayside because fixing something like a failed MA (the bloody things fail all the time) is a huge job and essential to keeping vehicles in service.
The people involved are pretty heroic!
...But say it became apparent that the vehicles needed to continue in service for another 5-10 years: would all maintenance decisions be exactly the same? For example, whether to repair or replace a failed component?
That’s probably the sort of timeframe ERS are looking at anyway for the more-troublesome Mk2s having recently acquired them from Serco. They’ll no doubt want to get some use/value out of them post-Sleepers.But say it became apparent that the vehicles needed to continue in service for another 5-10 years: would all maintenance decisions be exactly the same? For example, whether to repair or replace a failed component?
The Mk2s might be OK in a charter fleet where they are not used intensively and there are loads of spares and donor vehicles.
GWR might well want a couple more Mk3 sleepers for spares, perhaps? Though if they work well I think it would make sense to get them onto Mk5s as well, partly for standardisation and partly for longevity.
I’m not sure if this should be posted here or in the fares forum.
I buy a sleeper Flexipass about once a year and finished my last one a couple of weeks ago. I don’t expect to use the sleeper again until January / February but understand that there are going to be large price increases soon. I assume these will apply to the Flexipass.
Does anyone know the date of the increase and likely amount, as it may be worth me buying a new Flexipass before I need to use it. If it goes up too much I may stop getting one and reduce my sleeper travel but I'd like to have one for at least another year if I can.
I assume that once the new stock comes in the Flexipass will cover single berths as now, with perhaps a supplement if you want the ensuite ones?