Elecman
Established Member
Plenty of time to organise pilot drivers and locos with Route knowledge
Once more no consideration of dragging over the Settle Carlisle
Once more no consideration of dragging over the Settle Carlisle
The 73s
The 73s
How are you going to supply any kind of electric train supply to the train if it goes via the Settle Carlisle line? A 92 is the only type of locomotive which can supply enough ETS in normal circumstances and they won't get very far. Put a 66 on the front (if there is even one nearby) and you have three hours in which there is no train supply.
What do you propose? Asking DRS to supply eight 68s?
Again, how important is it to provide the service (especially since going via Settle Carlisle would not get passengers to their destination on time).
Once more no consideration of dragging over the Settle Carlisle
With that level of loco demand, DRS could probably charge CS with a bill more than the fares CS got from passengers on the train!
Genuine question: What happens to the on-train staff in this situation (e.g. catering etc)
Do they just get back in position on a daytime train tomorrow morning?
Genuine question: What happens to the on-train staff in this situation (e.g. catering etc)
Do they just get back in position on a daytime train tomorrow morning?
Hasn't it been suggested that they swap halfway on another night to be at the right location on Saturday morning.
Lockerbie is the normal changeover isn't it, providing one of the sleepers haven't been delayed.
One guy on Twitter has demanded they allow him to now use the 19:00 from Kings Cross instead but they told him ticket acceptance wasn't in place yet. He's adamant that he will go anyway and his ticket will be accepted. Good luck with that.
Highlander crews have swapped at Lockerbie in the past, yes.Lockerbie is the normal changeover isn't it, providing one of the sleepers haven't been delayed.
Highlander crews have swapped at Lockerbie in the past, yes.
Replacement road transport is being arranged, they are also trying to sort ticket acceptance.
One guy on Twitter has demanded they allow him to now use the 19:00 from Kings Cross instead but they told him ticket acceptance wasn't in place yet. He's adamant that he will go anyway and his ticket will be accepted. Good luck with that.
I cannot see how it can be in any way acceptable to put passengers on a bus.CS Twitter says Highlander pax will be coached to Edinburgh Waverley for ongoing conveyance by day train.
I cannot see how it can be in any way acceptable to put passengers on a bus.
I cannot see how it can be in any way acceptable to put passengers on a bus.
Surely network rail owner of the failed overhead picks up the costs plus reasonable administration costs?Imagine this (but fortunately it didn’t happen):
I get off the €* & get across (eventually) to Euston. & there CS tells me the sleeper isn’t running. So where am I to go?
- just board the train & I’ll have a bed for the night
- they’ll get me a taxi to convey me to a (“premium” of course) hotel
Basically, I think they’ll fail![]()
Agreed - the least they should do is run the Highlander south to Edinburgh, and allow passengers to stay on board until the first departure for London.
Well, so they should.Surely network rail owner of the failed overhead picks up the costs plus reasonable administration costs?
It looks to me (from RTT) like the Fort William portion has potentially run but the other two bits won't (and any sleeper passengers from the south travelling by coach at 2115 from Euston won't get to Edinburgh for 0450). Glasgow for 0548 is probably feasible though.
Didn't they run the coach to somewhere like Dumbarton the last time this happened?
If I'm reading the guest charter correctly you are entitled to both a refund and replacement transport.I would hope there is also the option of a full refund should you decline to take a bus and instead make your own arrangements for accommodation/travel.