• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Class 345 progress

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

railfanatic

Member
Joined
27 Jan 2014
Messages
63
Couple of issues that show up because of the new stopping patterns – it's not immediately obvious what stations a service will call at. As far as I remember, the next station isn't announced until after the train departs the current station, which can cause problems now that alternate services are skipping e.g. Forest Gate, Maryland, Manor Park etc. in the evenings.

I have taken this feedback on-board and proposed it to the stakeholders, although bear in mind RfL have the final say in what is announced...
 

railfanatic

Member
Joined
27 Jan 2014
Messages
63
It's very loud and unnecessarily repetitive. After leaving every station you don't need another "This is the train to Shenfield" when the same statement was made just moments before when the train was in the station.

This is needed for compliance to PRM-TSI I'm afraid.


On the visual display, why is every station shown with the circle interchange symbol? Romford, Stratford etc obviously should but the likes of Maryland, Ilford etc should not appear as an interchange.

That is just a generic circle for all stations.
 

matt_world2004

Established Member
Joined
5 Nov 2014
Messages
4,504
Very unlikely that 7 car trains will ever run in passenger service in the core. The 9 car platform screen doors would have to be controllable for length of train, and this would be an unnecessary point of failure. AIUI the Jubilee Line was not allowed to have variable train lengths when they were extended for this reason.
I believe it is possible to lock some jubilee PEDs in either an open or closed position this is used in engineering works.
 

samuelmorris

Established Member
Joined
18 Jul 2013
Messages
5,121
Location
Brentwood, Essex
That may well be true but it wouldn't be an acceptable solution for having a mixed fleet of 7 or 9 car-units, they'd all have to be reduced length to justify doing that.
 

railfanatic

Member
Joined
27 Jan 2014
Messages
63
Sure. It's good that someone is asking really!
- audio skip problems have improved but remain unresolved, are still very noticeable on some units, e.g. 009
The fix is being rolled out as we speak.

- As others have said, the brevity should probably be toned down a little. I also think that telling people that trains on the Shenfield route go 'via Stratford' is redundant and adds confusion to those less familiar with the area. 'Oh, is there a different way?'
Feedback taken on-board :)

- Interchanges should be announced as the train approaches a station, not when departing the one previous (esp. important between Liverpool St and Stratford where 6 minutes pass between that information and the train arriving there)
Proposed to stakeholders.

- TfL status info is presumably coming soon? Surprised it still isn't on there yet
Should be rolled out in the next two months.

- If the station names on the upcoming station 'map' are big enough text to read, the destination and next stop would probably fit on screen at the same time? Saves waiting too long for the info to roll round once more stuff is added to the rotation
The big text is needed for compliance to PRM-TSI I'm afraid - currently 33.5mm high.

- People just don't 'get' the dotted line concept for the calling pattern. It's a nice idea and makes sense to me, but from hearing other passengers' comments, including other people I know, it confuses them - nowhere on the train is the full calling pattern provided unless a driver manually makes an announcement stating the amendment. There is no way to obtain that information without looking at the screen on the platform or looking it up online, which doesn't really work for irregular travellers. I really think a means by which the whole calling pattern gets displayed needs to be brought in to replace this, perhaps a line that scrolls across or something, instead of the dotted line.
Not up to me I'm afraid :(

Plus, if feedback goes anywhere, the door sounders are still horrendous :P
I'm only a lowly PIS Engineer...
 

samuelmorris

Established Member
Joined
18 Jul 2013
Messages
5,121
Location
Brentwood, Essex
That's understandable and helpful, thanks. It does look as if you could fit four lines of text on those displays even with 33.5mm character height. Perhaps not. It's not the end of the world really, but two lines of plain black text do look like a very wasteful use of a full colour display!

I look forward to seeing what the 345 implementation of a TfL info screen looks like :) Here's hoping it's actually kept up to date unlike on the 700s (oh, and if the information isn't available, to hide the page, rather than have 8-day old information still showing up!)
 

Non Multi

Member
Joined
11 Dec 2017
Messages
1,118
That's understandable and helpful, thanks. It does look as if you could fit four lines of text on those displays even with 33.5mm character height. Perhaps not. It's not the end of the world really, but two lines of plain black text do look like a very wasteful use of a full colour display!
In this instance, less is more.
 

railfanatic

Member
Joined
27 Jan 2014
Messages
63
That's understandable and helpful, thanks. It does look as if you could fit four lines of text on those displays even with 33.5mm character height. Perhaps not. It's not the end of the world really, but two lines of plain black text do look like a very wasteful use of a full colour display!

I look forward to seeing what the 345 implementation of a TfL info screen looks like :) Here's hoping it's actually kept up to date unlike on the 700s (oh, and if the information isn't available, to hide the page, rather than have 8-day old information still showing up!)

I've put in logic wherein if I don't receive new information from the wayside for 300 seconds, the page will be hidden :)

The height of the screen is around 130mm; 4 lines will make the screen look way to busy!
 

samuelmorris

Established Member
Joined
18 Jul 2013
Messages
5,121
Location
Brentwood, Essex
Just slightly too small then, that's annoying but I suppose it couldn't be any larger or people would strike their heads on it.

Good to hear sense is being applied where it wasn't for the 700s :)
 

FlippyFF

Member
Joined
5 Jan 2014
Messages
240
Location
Ashford, Kent
<snip>

I look forward to seeing what the 345 implementation of a TfL info screen looks like :) Here's hoping it's actually kept up to date unlike on the 700s (oh, and if the information isn't available, to hide the page, rather than have 8-day old information still showing up!)

To be fair to the 700s, not that I'm a fan, but the TfL status page has been getting better. Riding one the other day I noted the time stamp on the TfL status page as we arrived at Farringdon and again as we approached St Pancras and it updated between the two stops. Generally it seems more up to date but there is still the odd hiccup.

Simon
 

samuelmorris

Established Member
Joined
18 Jul 2013
Messages
5,121
Location
Brentwood, Essex
Not sure about this morning as due to the delays I came in slightly earlier where I don't know the diagrams but 2W50 is a 315 substitution this evening.

On a hopefully unrelated note, the entire Eastern platform area of Liverpool Street absolutely reeks of electrical burning. Not sure what that's about!
 

jon0844

Veteran Member
Joined
1 Feb 2009
Messages
28,072
Location
UK
To be fair to the 700s, not that I'm a fan, but the TfL status page has been getting better. Riding one the other day I noted the time stamp on the TfL status page as we arrived at Farringdon and again as we approached St Pancras and it updated between the two stops. Generally it seems more up to date but there is still the odd hiccup.

On the GN software they've removed the time/date in the corner (it now just says 'Powered by TfL Open Data')!

There's also now the date/time and a constant showing of what coach you're in, along with a graphical 'see it, say it, sorted' poster instead of plain text as on the TL 700s.
 

class387

Established Member
Joined
9 Oct 2015
Messages
1,525
On the GN software they've removed the time/date in the corner (it now just says 'Powered by TfL Open Data')!

There's also now the date/time and a constant showing of what coach you're in, along with a graphical 'see it, say it, sorted' poster instead of plain text as on the TL 700s.
I do like the clock, something that I thought was missing on the 700s, but do not see the point of the 'coach x of 8' diagram, given that it is shown on the toilet and loading displays anyway.
 

samuelmorris

Established Member
Joined
18 Jul 2013
Messages
5,121
Location
Brentwood, Essex
I do like the clock, something that I thought was missing on the 700s, but do not see the point of the 'coach x of 8' diagram, given that it is shown on the toilet and loading displays anyway.
Probably because that isn't shown between short station gaps. Isn't this the wrong thread for that though?
 

700007

Established Member
Joined
6 May 2017
Messages
1,195
Location
Near a bunch of sheds that aren't 66s.
I've put in logic wherein if I don't receive new information from the wayside for 300 seconds, the page will be hidden :)

The height of the screen is around 130mm; 4 lines will make the screen look way to busy!
Hey, that's great to hear. Thanks for the info!

Do you also work on the 315s? Is it possible to fix the Maryland, Manor Park issue so that it works?
 

jon0844

Veteran Member
Joined
1 Feb 2009
Messages
28,072
Location
UK
I do like the clock, something that I thought was missing on the 700s, but do not see the point of the 'coach x of 8' diagram, given that it is shown on the toilet and loading displays anyway.

SDO will be in use with as many as 4 cars locked out.
 

railfanatic

Member
Joined
27 Jan 2014
Messages
63
Hey, that's great to hear. Thanks for the info!

Do you also work on the 315s? Is it possible to fix the Maryland, Manor Park issue so that it works?
I don't I'm afraid, I only work on the Class 345, 710, 720, 701...
 

Domh245

Established Member
Joined
6 Apr 2013
Messages
8,426
Location
nowhere
Reported elsewhere that 345021 ran under it's own power through between Abbey Wood and Connaught Tunnel in the early hours of the morning. It should make it as far as Stepney Green Junction as well during the week
 

Domh245

Established Member
Joined
6 Apr 2013
Messages
8,426
Location
nowhere

theageofthetra

On Moderation
Joined
27 May 2012
Messages
3,508
Reported elsewhere that 345021 ran under it's own power through between Abbey Wood and Connaught Tunnel in the early hours of the morning. It should make it as far as Stepney Green Junction as well during the week
It was berthed at Abbey Wood earlier. I hope they stick it in a tunnel before the local 'artists' graffiti it.
 

Trailfinder

Member
Joined
15 Jan 2015
Messages
84
Another 345 delivered this afternoon/evening from Old Dalby to Hayes And Harlington Loop. According to Realtime Trains going to carry out test runs between Paddington and Reading, then stabling at Maidenhead. I assume all this is weather dependent.
 

samuelmorris

Established Member
Joined
18 Jul 2013
Messages
5,121
Location
Brentwood, Essex
First example of a 345 with the wrong PIS code entered this evening. Suppose you can kind of forgive it under the circumstances, but unhelpful given tempers are already frayed. Driver has made no announcement to correct the fact that the train is stating it runs fast from Stratford to Ilford.
On opening the doors at each intermediate station it wasn't programmed for it announced Stratford again. I suppose this is one occasion when extreme brevity in the announcements pays off - very little incorrect information as there's very little information to begin with. Slightly unimpressed that the situation has occurred though!
 

matt_world2004

Established Member
Joined
5 Nov 2014
Messages
4,504
According to rtt all the 345 core tunnel testing is happening overnight, is there any reason why this is not happening during socialable hours given the tracks are completely segregated and the tunnel is not in public use,
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top