• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Class 387

Status
Not open for further replies.

Metobusfan

Member
Joined
20 Jul 2014
Messages
121
There are plently of sidings now being built to modern standards, removing them all years ago isn't short sighted as they wouldn't be much use to today and would require rebuilding any way. There 6x 20 car roads at Cricklewood (which will become 24 cars soon and the same amount on the south side currently being built, with the sidings used to store released stock prior to being cascased) along with new depot at Three Bridges and other places means there is a lot of new stabling but these aren't so helpful for commissioning work.



EDIT:



Update on fleet build from WNXX



387106 should be complete

387107 should be completed next week

387108 should be complete early next month

387110 underframe complete next week



387101



DSC_0528_01 by Carl Westwood, on Flickr



EDIT 2:



387102 has been moved to Old Dalby this evening.





Here's some images of the drag



https://www.flickr.com/photos/60628514@N02/15042909351



https://www.flickr.com/photos/61070880@N04/15041789971



https://www.flickr.com/photos/60628514@N02/15045979515



https://www.flickr.com/photos/61070880@N04/15044849295


I guess that's the work they are doing to cricket wood
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Fincra5

Established Member
Joined
6 Jun 2009
Messages
2,494
Seems to have a half arsedly applied livery.. the grey band under the window, similar to 313s...
 

physics34

Established Member
Joined
1 Dec 2013
Messages
3,720
Seems to have a half arsedly applied livery.. the grey band under the window, similar to 313s...

the green bits......

the 377/6s that first 377/6s that were under test ran around with bits of their livery missing.

As "Class377/5" says, they could be living that space free for a webaddress or the logo.
 

MCR247

Established Member
Joined
7 Nov 2008
Messages
9,666
Maybe it's what govia want for a promotional kind of livery?
 

starrymarkb

Established Member
Joined
4 Aug 2009
Messages
5,985
Location
Exeter
Or might not be finished yet. There could be a big reveal coming up and so parts of the livery are covered up.

I remember when American Airlines rebranded, they launched the new livery on a brand new aircraft. However to keep the brand under wraps it was tested and did staff training with large white vinyls covering the new logo and tail to avoid any spotters spoiling their reveal.
 

Class377/5

Established Member
Joined
19 Jun 2010
Messages
5,594
Anyone have any idea why every single carriage has a different amount of dark green stripe (no stripe, full stripe, just the ends striped, one end striped)?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8JWu25YG898

Because the units aren't finished, they are currently under going testing. No different when 377601 came down for testing on the Southern region, it was in half finished Southern livery.
 

Chris125

Established Member
Joined
12 Nov 2009
Messages
3,081
Or might not be finished yet. There could be a big reveal coming up and so parts of the livery are covered up.

As they'll be moving on from Thameslink relatively quickly they may not even get a full livery, just basic branding.

Chris
 

thelem

Member
Joined
17 Mar 2008
Messages
550
Anyone have any idea why every single carriage has a different amount of dark green stripe (no stripe, full stripe, just the ends striped, one end striped)?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8JWu25YG898

If you look at the far side (visible at the start of the video) you can see that it is applied slightly differently (the last carriage has the end striped too), so it does look like they just ran out of time and will finish it later.
 

Class377/5

Established Member
Joined
19 Jun 2010
Messages
5,594
Is the seating in these the same as the 377/6 and 377/7, including the first class section?

Seating is the same as the 377/6 & /7 in standard. Not 100% sure about first class as I haven't seen it.

EDIT:

387104 was moved to Old Dalby this afternoon.

66616 & 387104, Cossington 10/09/2014 by Michael Sutton Rail Photography, on Flickr

More photos of testing here

387101 running around - https://flic.kr/p/p6kPQJ

8 car 387 - https://flic.kr/p/oPWbc4

8 car VIP trip

electrostar emu 387102 & 387101 by neil booton, on Flickr
 
Last edited:

southern442

Established Member
Joined
20 May 2013
Messages
2,200
Location
Surrey
So will these trains enter service in just the green doors and stripe or will they receive full southern livery?
 

Class377/5

Established Member
Joined
19 Jun 2010
Messages
5,594
Does anybody know when these units might enter service?

First one isn't due from commissioning until end of October, so maybe this year.

So will these trains enter service in just the green doors and stripe or will they receive full southern livery?

They won't receive the Southern livery as they won't ever be operated by Southern.
 

westcoaster

Established Member
Joined
4 Dec 2006
Messages
4,245
Location
DTOS A or B
We have been told that the 387's will be limited to 100 mph while in operation on the MML.
Would that be due to the overheads or just not needed.
 

Bald Rick

Veteran Member
Joined
28 Sep 2010
Messages
29,328
We have been told that the 387's will be limited to 100 mph while in operation on the MML.
Would that be due to the overheads or just not needed.

AIUI the MML is not yet cleared for multi-pan operation above 100mph. Presumably these won't be operating as single units very often, so to avoid driver confusion ( especially with the 377s also) I imagine a 100mph restriction is the answer.
 

Class377/5

Established Member
Joined
19 Jun 2010
Messages
5,594
There's also no timetabling benefit to using 110mph as the 700s will be 100mph units so no point in using that advantage then using it within a few years. Better to keep things simple.
 

notadriver

Established Member
Joined
1 Oct 2010
Messages
3,658
Will that limit just be an instruction to drivers as no doubt 110 mph max speed will be shown in cabs.
 

LNW-GW Joint

Veteran Member
Joined
22 Feb 2011
Messages
19,840
Location
Mold, Clwyd
AIUI the MML is not yet cleared for multi-pan operation above 100mph. Presumably these won't be operating as single units very often, so to avoid driver confusion ( especially with the 377s also) I imagine a 100mph restriction is the answer.

What about when the wires reach Corby and further north?
I understand the St Pancras-Bedford OHLE would have to be upgraded for operation over 100mph (as will Paddington-Airport Jn).
It wouldn't seem sensible to limit new stock to 100mph where the route has been upgraded to 110/125mph (for IEP or whatever electric stock the MML gets).
 

Class377/5

Established Member
Joined
19 Jun 2010
Messages
5,594
Now seems there's going to be a 3rd order of 387s according to Derby sources for 21 additional 387 units.

Likely destination is Great Western as all 29x 387/1 that are to be used on Thameslink first are now heading that way. It would Great Western 50 units to play with then.
 

physics34

Established Member
Joined
1 Dec 2013
Messages
3,720
Now seems there's going to be a 3rd order of 387s according to Derby sources for 21 additional 387 units.

Likely destination is Great Western as all 29x 387/1 that are to be used on Thameslink first are now heading that way. It would Great Western 50 units to play with then.

yeh just read the article from Modern railways. So if the 319s are not going to FGW, the ones that are not going to northern will be surplus.

Athough it would be a waste of the AC capabilities and is unlikely id like to see them replace Southern 455s and 313s.
 

Manchester77

Established Member
Joined
4 Jun 2012
Messages
2,628
Location
Manchester
So does this mean that 387s will be a homogenous fleet for the GW or will they just be for the GWML Thames Valley services with 319s for the branches & Bristol?
 

swt_passenger

Veteran Member
Joined
7 Apr 2010
Messages
31,593
So does this mean that 387s will be a homogenous fleet for the GW or will they just be for the GWML Thames Valley services with 319s for the branches & Bristol?

I too would have some doubts about all GW EMU services needing 387s. Although there are advantages of a common fleet, the 110 mph capability would be somewhat wasted on a service such as the Newbury to Reading stopper, although we've seen references in the earlier GWML franchise spec to NR wanting 110 mph units for the main line services into Paddington..

You'd think there were some better claims on the stock, such as the MML Corby suggestions. Good luck to them if it's going to be 387s everywhere on the GW, but is it the right solution for the railway when considered nationally?
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top