D365
Veteran Member
- Joined
- 29 Jun 2012
- Messages
- 12,258
Well, these rumours are a bit fishy.
Danged autocorrect! (And me not proof reading)I don't see how breath can be baited?!![]()
Remaining 442 workings from Monday
SL051/052
5F82 06+45 Eastbourne Sidings to Eastbourne
1F82 07.12 Eastbourne to London Bridge
5F82 09+00 London Bridge to Streatham Hill
5Y81 11+54 Streatham Hill to Stewarts Lane
Berth
5Y82 14+35 Stewarts Lane to Streatham Hill
3F27 16+55 Streatham Hill to London Bridge
1B47 17.57 London Bridge to Brighton
1A13 19.28 Brighton to Victoria
1A36 20.50 Victoria to Brighton
1A39 21.58 Brighton to Victoria
1A26 23.07 Victoria to Brighton
5H74 00+13 Brighton to Hove Yard via Preston Park
SL059/060
5A65 06+55 Hove Yard to Brighton via Preston Park
1B08 07.32 Brighton to London Bridge
5B13 08+58 London Bridge to Lovers Walk
Berth
5B46 15+46 Lovers Walk to Brighton
1B46 16.58 Brighton to London Bridge
1F83 18.23 London Bridge to Eastbourne
5F83 20+16 Eastbourne to Eastbourne Sidings
SL068/069
5T60 05+20 Stewarts Lane to Victoria
1A02 06.06 Victoria to Brighton
1A13 07.29 Brighton to Victoria
5T13 08+45 Victoria to Stewarts Lane
Berth
is what i dont understand is, if these trains were destined for the scrap yard why arent they going straight to the scrap yard rather than being kept in warm store? im sure everyone insisted the same about great westerns hsts, but that turned out to be incorrect and a lot of those are destined for scotrail
is what i dont understand is, if these trains were destined for the scrap yard why arent they going straight to the scrap yard rather than being kept in warm store? im sure everyone insisted the same about great westerns hsts, but that turned out to be incorrect and a lot of those are destined for scotrail
Has been of before.Hi fellas,
I've just came up with an innovative idea that the 5WES' could be converted to LHCS and hauled by locomotives on TPE!
Now I bet no ones ever thought of that before?!![]()
The HST is a 23m diesel engine train so suited to many parts of the network. The 23m 442 need 3rd rail (rebuild is so expensive new build will likely be cheaper right right) and limited places where you can put a 23m train in 3rd rail land. And anywhere they fit doesn't want them.
How about this for a plan? Re-gauge Class 442 to 3ft gauge, transport them to Shore Station at Southend, disconnect all their brakes, give them a small nudge and set them on their merry little way for about a mile and a half?
The GWR plan* was first mentioned publicly by a member of GWR's fleet management on the wnxx forum who suggested they will have a shortfall of units between the 150/1s departing and the 16x units from the Thames Valley arriving, so there would be 4 diagrams for loco hauled stock on Cardiff - Plymouth to cover the shortfall... 442s have been suggested as the coaching stock for this work. It seems plausible that there may be a shortage of trains when stock is transferred away with GWR wiring running late, and that a stop gap may therefore be required, but whether or not 442s will feature we will have to wait and see.
* The GWR ''plan'' seems to be changing pretty much weekly so do not take any of the above as gospel, as with anything rolling stock related I'd take it with a pinch of salt until something actually happens!
I thought that the solution to that was going to be the shortened HST 'GTI' sets
That plan has been put on hold now. There is a new plan for 11 x 2+8 HST sets to head to XC, in exchange for 11 x 220s or 221s to head to GWR, awaiting DfT approval, and maybe revealed in the AXC Direct Award as a quick win solution, especially as the Direct Award for XC is pretty much confirmed to be zero growth (no joke), so no additional stock will be brought in.
If the above goes ahead, the Voyagers will work Cardiff - Taunton and Plymouth - Penzance (alongside 150/2's), along with a few through services each day.
However, the plan has changed so many times, I will believe it when I see it
That appears to have been put on hold, as posted in the 185 thread by Rich McLean:
So Northern just gets screwed over in the process? What are they going to do to make up for the 150/1s not being there when they should?No, it's very much on. The final details on the legals are being worked on now, together with the plan for the work to be done. This involves The XC and Scottish sets as they are all planned to be done at the same works.
The loco hauled option is just that. It is a straw man to compare with other DMU options, such as retaining stock that was due to go to Northern for a few months more. The DfT are to be the ones who are deciding but they are known to be not currently keen on the LHCS option for GWR.
So far as we so far know the 150/1 that were due to go in August 2017 are almost certainly being authorised to be retained in GWR to December 2017 and the 5 Porterbrook cl.153 have been authorised to be kept too. The fate of 3 of the Angel cl.153 are yet unknown but FG are on the case with these too. The 143 sets look as if they will be around to mid to late 2018.
So the shortfall is looking like 6 cars on present stock levels and it doesn't take a genius to work out that if wires to Maidenhead can release another 2 turbos from what is expected, the 2 150/0 units could head west to fill the gap before the Turbos start arriving or the first HST-GTI set gets converted, both of which will now be sometime in summer 2017.
Couldn't resist!
Neither can I: do shut up. 442 "gags" are just tedious now.
So Northern just gets screwed over in the process? What are they going to do to make up for the 150/1s not being there when they should?
They're just getting a little plastic now![]()
This forum is obsessed with these trains!
I thought the 442s were going onto the North Downs service replacing the Turbos.
As I understand it, one driving car is to become a battery car to cover the gaps in the 3rd rail.
There will be 2 new services operated by them involving a couple of extra spurs.
1 - Reading to Gatwick, with a spur to the runway where wings will pop out so that they can fly to Paris
2 - Reading to Gatwick then Brighton, where a spur to the rebuilt pier will enable their hovercraft function to get them across the channel and onwards.
A bit chitty chitty bang bang really.
I thought the 442s were going onto the North Downs service replacing the Turbos.
As I understand it, one driving car is to become a battery car to cover the gaps in the 3rd rail.
There will be 2 new services operated by them involving a couple of extra spurs.
1 - Reading to Gatwick, with a spur to the runway where wings will pop out so that they can fly to Paris
2 - Reading to Gatwick then Brighton, where a spur to the rebuilt pier will enable their hovercraft function to get them across the channel and onwards.
A bit chitty chitty bang bang really.
I would have thought an easier option would be to offer a replacement for services running off platform 9 3/4 from Kings Cross.....![]()
I thought the 442s were going onto the North Downs service replacing the Turbos.
As I understand it, one driving car is to become a battery car to cover the gaps in the 3rd rail.
There will be 2 new services operated by them involving a couple of extra spurs.
1 - Reading to Gatwick, with a spur to the runway where wings will pop out so that they can fly to Paris
2 - Reading to Gatwick then Brighton, where a spur to the rebuilt pier will enable their hovercraft function to get them across the channel and onwards.
A bit chitty chitty bang bang really.