I was shocked recently when I saw the fares on the Harrogate line. A passenger asked for a single to Cattal and was asked for £5.10. I checked and this is indeed the cheapest available single fare. The journey is only 10 miles! That's disgraceful and exploitative. No wonder the 1717 peak time service wasn't that full with only a few standees. The daft fares must be pushing people onto the roads, as I 'raced' Max to Knaresborough, I beat him on a Pacer by about 20 minutes because the road journey was so slow due to so many people using it.
An extra 75 (ish) miles for a Whitby to Cattal is only an extra £6.00
So customers are being charged roughly 50% the price of a Whitby-Cattal for only about 11% of the mileage.
Cattal to Knaresborough isn't any better, at £3.90 for a single for 6 miles.
At under 6 miles, Horsforth to Weeton £4.50 for a single is another ludicrous fare.
Cattal-Micklefield is bizarrely set by TPE, despite TPE not operating on either the Harrogate line at all, or the York-Leeds locals. This means there is a First Day Return at £30.20. Presumably for this price they provide a taxi to go 15 miles down the A1?!
York-Micklefield is also quite poor value at £6.60 single / £8.90 return (no cheaper fares than that at all) for only 16 miles. Over twice the distance from Micklefield to Marsden (about 33 miles) is only £5.20 for a return!
To use one example in Scotland, you can get from Edinburgh to Pitlochry for £17.60 for a day return, which isn't bad for 90 miles. But then the journey becomes very rural and a ticket from Pitlochry to Kingussie, which is less than half the distance, is also £17.60.
York to Goole is about 25 miles by road, yet the cheapest single ticket costs a whopping £15.50. Would anyone actually buy such a ticket?
Micklefield-Church Fenton is £4.40 return for 5 miles.
Church Fenton-Pontefract is £5.70 return for 10 miles.
Yet Micklefield-Church Fenton-Pontefract is £3.20 return because it doesn't count as a rural journey as both origin and destination are within West Yorkshire. Anyone doing a rural journey is best off not admitting it, buying the longer ticket and cutting the journey short or starting short (this is valid).
Anyone going from Micklefield-Sherburn must not ask for such a ticket as it would cost more than three times the fare to the next stop, Pontefract. Although I accept that anyone without mobility problems would probably buy a ticket to South Milford and walk from there but that's beside the point.
Now I know that the railways don't operate a distance based pricing structure and I am not campaigning for that, but what is the point in pricing rural journeys on trains that are not overcrowded like they are in London, at levels that are so high that the residents of those places would just laugh at the thought of paying them and just drive instead?
The argument that "The TOCs must make a profit" is a red herring as these services are not profitable in any sense and run as a public service. But how is it a public service if the fares are ripping the public off?
An extra 75 (ish) miles for a Whitby to Cattal is only an extra £6.00
So customers are being charged roughly 50% the price of a Whitby-Cattal for only about 11% of the mileage.
Cattal to Knaresborough isn't any better, at £3.90 for a single for 6 miles.
At under 6 miles, Horsforth to Weeton £4.50 for a single is another ludicrous fare.
Cattal-Micklefield is bizarrely set by TPE, despite TPE not operating on either the Harrogate line at all, or the York-Leeds locals. This means there is a First Day Return at £30.20. Presumably for this price they provide a taxi to go 15 miles down the A1?!
York-Micklefield is also quite poor value at £6.60 single / £8.90 return (no cheaper fares than that at all) for only 16 miles. Over twice the distance from Micklefield to Marsden (about 33 miles) is only £5.20 for a return!
To use one example in Scotland, you can get from Edinburgh to Pitlochry for £17.60 for a day return, which isn't bad for 90 miles. But then the journey becomes very rural and a ticket from Pitlochry to Kingussie, which is less than half the distance, is also £17.60.
York to Goole is about 25 miles by road, yet the cheapest single ticket costs a whopping £15.50. Would anyone actually buy such a ticket?
Micklefield-Church Fenton is £4.40 return for 5 miles.
Church Fenton-Pontefract is £5.70 return for 10 miles.
Yet Micklefield-Church Fenton-Pontefract is £3.20 return because it doesn't count as a rural journey as both origin and destination are within West Yorkshire. Anyone doing a rural journey is best off not admitting it, buying the longer ticket and cutting the journey short or starting short (this is valid).
Anyone going from Micklefield-Sherburn must not ask for such a ticket as it would cost more than three times the fare to the next stop, Pontefract. Although I accept that anyone without mobility problems would probably buy a ticket to South Milford and walk from there but that's beside the point.
Now I know that the railways don't operate a distance based pricing structure and I am not campaigning for that, but what is the point in pricing rural journeys on trains that are not overcrowded like they are in London, at levels that are so high that the residents of those places would just laugh at the thought of paying them and just drive instead?
The argument that "The TOCs must make a profit" is a red herring as these services are not profitable in any sense and run as a public service. But how is it a public service if the fares are ripping the public off?