gazthomas
Established Member
See https://twitter.com/GBRailfreight for more pictures
I see the ScotRail HST Thunderbird brigade or the 442 fantasists haven't discovered this thread yet
How much did DBS punt their 67s off to Colas for - I'd imagine the asking price would be fairly similar, if they are that desperate that is?
But these locos only exist because of BR's failure to meet Foster Yeoman's availability requirements back in the early 1980's. If UK PLC had produced world class products they probably wouldn't have existed.GBRf commemorating 70 years since BR by repainting a member of their ugliest, most disliked class of loco, designed and built in the US? Makes sense.
You really shouldn't over-think this, you know!GBRf commemorating 70 years since BR by repainting a member of their ugliest, most disliked class of loco, designed and built in the US? Makes sense.
Styled in the UK. Take away the pointy cab roof and it's very close to the 58. The 59 cab was designed with a lot of UK driver representation.designed and built in the US
Styled in the UK. Take away the pointy cab roof and it's very close to the 58. The 59 cab was designed with a lot of UK driver representation.
That may or may not be true. Personally, I don't see the resemblance but more 'traction savvy' people may see more similarities than I do.Apparently the 59 cab design was inspired by the Westerns...
GBRf commemorating 70 years since BR by repainting a member of their ugliest, most disliked class of loco, designed and built in the US? Makes sense.
Surprised it wasn't applied to a class 92, BR's final loco.
If privatisation hadn't happened, I doubt it would have been in any way politically acceptable for BR to order 250+ North American built diesel locos over an a UK built design from Brush or Alstom.
GBRf commemorating 70 years since BR by repainting a member of their ugliest, most disliked class of loco, designed and built in the US? Makes sense.
I think that’s right. Foster Yeoman owned D1010 Western Campaigner in the early 1980s and renumbered and named it to D1035 Western Yeoman as an exhibit/pet.Apparently the 59 cab design was inspired by the Westerns...
EWS didn't become Canadian-owned (by CN) until October 2001 - most of the initial 250 class 66's had been delivered by then (and were ordered years before).But it was ok for EWS, naturally of course owned by a Canadian rail company.
Indeed, it was pure coincidence that American company Wisconsin Central Ltd., who created EWS, ordered 250 66s from EMD, who built them at their Canadian plant in London, Ontario. The London plant closed in 2011, so EMD had to turn to one of their American plants in Muncie, Indiana for 66752-779.EWS didn't become Canadian-owned (by CN) until October 2001 - most of the initial 250 class 66's had been delivered by then (and were ordered years before).
Ah, I did not know this.EWS didn't become Canadian-owned (by CN) until October 2001 - most of the initial 250 class 66's had been delivered by then (and were ordered years before).
GBRf commemorating 70 years since BR by repainting a member of their ugliest, most disliked class of loco, designed and built in the US? Makes sense.
It works well being part of a newer mode of traction, they are paying tribute to BR, not emulating it by painting an actual BR loco in its old scheme.GBRf commemorating 70 years since BR by repainting a member of their ugliest, most disliked class of loco, designed and built in the US? Makes sense.
Indeed.Typical spotter wibble. The livery is a homage, nothing more, and certainly not intended to be a homage to rail enthusiasts.
As the Cl 59 cab interior was modeled on the 58 cab interior, it is probably much more likely that the exterior followed suite too...That may or may not be true. Personally, I don't see the resemblance but more 'traction savvy' people may see more similarities than I do.
Paint keeps rust from getting at the steel. Other than that, what is behind the loco earning money is far more important.Was there this much aggro when they painted the final 66 in Br Lined Green? All seems a bit ridiculous.