• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Devon & Cornwall mini-franchise to be considered

Status
Not open for further replies.

jw

Member
Joined
25 Jul 2010
Messages
167
George Osborne floats the idea of a mini franchise for Devon & Cornwall. Just talk from a politician in an election year or a serious suggestion?

The Prime Minister and Chancellor are to make visits across Cornwall, Devon and Somerset today to unveil a “long-term economic plan for the South West”.

The plan is designed to help offset the dominance of London and show the region has more to offer than “stunning coast and beaches”.

They say a new “dedicated” rail franchise for Devon and Cornwall to deliver better local services and a second inland mainline in Devon will be considered.

http://www.plymouthherald.co.uk/Cha...billion-plan/story-25923241-detail/story.html
 
Last edited:
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Busaholic

Veteran Member
Joined
7 Jun 2014
Messages
14,091
Having clicked on that link and read the recycled vacuous garbage for myself my eye strayed down the page to this headline:-
GHOST SHIP FULL OF CANNIBAL RATS DOESN'T CRASH INTO PLYMOUTH
Just had to share that earth-shattering news with you - a classic even by local paper standards.Presumably a full list of places this imaginary ship hasn't crashed into is available on request, starting with Abergavenny.

My apologies for going off-topic
 

NSEFAN

Established Member
Joined
17 Jun 2007
Messages
3,504
Location
Southampton
What's wrong with the set up in place? Creating another franchise would only add to the fragmentation and cost, all for the sake of putting a different name on the trains so people can feel special.
 

route:oxford

Established Member
Joined
1 Nov 2008
Messages
4,949
Having clicked on that link and read the recycled vacuous garbage for myself my eye strayed down the page to this headline:-
GHOST SHIP FULL OF CANNIBAL RATS DOESN'T CRASH INTO PLYMOUTH
Just had to share that earth-shattering news with you - a classic even by local paper standards.Presumably a full list of places this imaginary ship hasn't crashed into is available on request, starting with Abergavenny.

My apologies for going off-topic

You need to read up on the "ghost ship" thing. They are quite real.

A mini-franchise isn't such a bad thing. There is a clear desperation to allow some form of "not-for-profit" organisation to operate a rail franchise.

This might be the right route for Go-op.
 

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
97,895
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
Eh? Surely it's just re-creating the Wessex Trains franchise?

Utterly pointless and a waste of money.

Very small, almost single-route but sometimes two or three routes, mini-franchise type things seem to work very well in Germany. Not to mention of course Merseyrail.

Though the integration with fGW mainline would be lost, which as these are heavily touristed routes this might be too big a loss.

Neil
 

NotATrainspott

Established Member
Joined
2 Feb 2013
Messages
3,224
It would make more sense to have specific minimum quality standards set in the main Great Western franchise for the South West. It would be the same TOC, so it would have economies of scale, but it wouldn't be possible for them to ignore the region entirely when making up plans.
 

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
97,895
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
It would make more sense to have specific minimum quality standards set in the main Great Western franchise for the South West. It would be the same TOC, so it would have economies of scale, but it wouldn't be possible for them to ignore the region entirely when making up plans.

Or we do follow the German model where local services are entirely the responsibility of a more local level of Government. It does seem to be proving increasingly popular - TfL, Merseytravel, the forthcoming Transport North, West Midlands, Wales, Scotland, .... Though the risk is we lose some safeguards on rural routes if we aren't careful.

You'd then just have West Coast, East Coast, EMT IC, Anglia IC (debatable), GW IC and XC as national franchises.

Neil
 

TheEdge

Established Member
Joined
29 Nov 2012
Messages
4,489
Location
Norwich
Or we do follow the German model where local services are entirely the responsibility of a more local level of Government. It does seem to be proving increasingly popular - TfL, Merseytravel, the forthcoming Transport North, West Midlands, Wales, Scotland, .... Though the risk is we lose some safeguards on rural routes if we aren't careful.

Which does seem to be a risk of that model. I've been building stuff for the Railworks Koblenz-Cologne route and as I've been reading seen a few examples where RB services have been cut short because local governments have just said no to paying. Services on between Remagen and Wuppertal now stop in Bonn rather than going all the way to Remagen because one local government refused to pay for its section.
 

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
97,895
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
Which does seem to be a risk of that model. I've been building stuff for the Railworks Koblenz-Cologne route and as I've been reading seen a few examples where RB services have been cut short because local governments have just said no to paying. Services on between Remagen and Wuppertal now stop in Bonn rather than going all the way to Remagen because one local government refused to pay for its section.

Possibly quite a high risk given the levels of cuts to local bus services of late. Some Councils have completely withdrawn all subsidy. The effects of that on rail services would be disastrous, particularly as it's much harder to get a rail service back once you've lost it - bus services can always be reinstated in better financial times.

Neil
 

richw

Veteran Member
Joined
10 Jun 2010
Messages
11,234
Location
Liskeard
Or we do follow the German model where local services are entirely the responsibility of a more local level of Government. It does seem to be proving increasingly popular - TfL, Merseytravel, the forthcoming Transport North, West Midlands, Wales, Scotland, .... Though the risk is we lose some safeguards on rural routes if we aren't careful.

You'd then just have West Coast, East Coast, EMT IC, Anglia IC (debatable), GW IC and XC as national franchises.

Neil

Have you seen what cornwall council have done to the bus services. Don't let them anywhere near the trains!
 

Busaholic

Veteran Member
Joined
7 Jun 2014
Messages
14,091
You need to read up on the "ghost ship" thing. They are quite real.

A mini-franchise isn't such a bad thing. There is a clear desperation to allow some form of "not-for-profit" organisation to operate a rail franchise.

This might be the right route for Go-op.

Perhaps I've read up a bit more than you on the 'ghost ship' - this story first made the Plymouth Evening Herald on January 27th 2014, except it then said 'could be about to crash', and this a whole further year from when it cast adrift from near the Irish coast.Scaremongering at its most parochial.

The topic itself is amost recycled a year from when Cameron fell upon Devon promising the earth = a year which has seen almost no action beyond the repair and minimal strengthening of the Dawlish environs.

From the Cornish point of view a regular hourly service through from Penzance to Plymouth would be a start, with peak extras, but it can't happen because the carriages aren't available and won't be for the foreseeable future. When I moved to Penzance there was a 17.05 or thereabouts train starting in Truro and three other trains between 16'45 and 18.00 bound for Penzance: now between 16.26 and 18.47 there is one, despite more passengers travelling. Perhaps Cornwall Council and Plymouth City Council should get together and lease a couple of trains themselves, so long as no profits went to FGW.
 

richw

Veteran Member
Joined
10 Jun 2010
Messages
11,234
Location
Liskeard
Perhaps I've read up a bit more than you on the 'ghost ship' - this story first made the Plymouth Evening Herald on January 27th 2014, except it then said 'could be about to crash', and this a whole further year from when it cast adrift from near the Irish coast.Scaremongering at its most parochial.

The topic itself is amost recycled a year from when Cameron fell upon Devon promising the earth = a year which has seen almost no action beyond the repair and minimal strengthening of the Dawlish environs.

From the Cornish point of view a regular hourly service through from Penzance to Plymouth would be a start, with peak extras, but it can't happen because the carriages aren't available and won't be for the foreseeable future. When I moved to Penzance there was a 17.05 or thereabouts train starting in Truro and three other trains between 16'45 and 18.00 bound for Penzance: now between 16.26 and 18.47 there is one, despite more passengers travelling. Perhaps Cornwall Council and Plymouth City Council should get together and lease a couple of trains themselves, so long as no profits went to FGW.

I work at newham, and to finish at 1700, it's not possible to walk and catch the the 1723, making the train an unrealistic option unless I don't get home until just after 1900. St Austell and stations East don't even have a true peak service to go west between 1700 & 1800.
Driving leaves the only option unless I want to lose my evening. Driving gets me home about 1745 normally due to truro traffic, so a 1730 train would get me home about the same time as driving. (I live 100 yards or so from redruth station so the walking time at that end is a minute or two at most). The train is a much cheaper option. £15 a week roughly from memory, yet petrol is probably close to £25 a week (I have a big petrol car)
 

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
97,895
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
From the Cornish point of view a regular hourly service through from Penzance to Plymouth would be a start, with peak extras, but it can't happen because the carriages aren't available and won't be for the foreseeable future. When I moved to Penzance there was a 17.05 or thereabouts train starting in Truro and three other trains between 16'45 and 18.00 bound for Penzance: now between 16.26 and 18.47 there is one, despite more passengers travelling. Perhaps Cornwall Council and Plymouth City Council should get together and lease a couple of trains themselves, so long as no profits went to FGW.

The problem is there aren't any spare DMUs.

Neil
 

Simon11

Established Member
Joined
7 Nov 2010
Messages
1,335
Not unless you have large deep pockets. New DMU won't be cheap, as they may not get full use over their lifetime. This is mostly down to electrification and new restrictions on engines.
 

455driver

Veteran Member
Joined
10 May 2010
Messages
11,332
Not unless you have large deep pockets. New DMU won't be cheap, as they may not get full use over their lifetime. This is mostly down to electrification and new restrictions on engines.

Which was the same reason given for the HSTs being built with slam doors and dump toilets!
Every InterCity route was to be electrified and the APT would take over within a decade, that was from 1976!
I dont think the plan worked! :lol:

I would hazard a guess that any leasing company building (decent) DMUs today would get a full return (and then some) on their investment, the railways/politicians dont really do long term strategy and I reckon a large numbers of DMUs will still be around in 30 years time!
 
Last edited:

RPI

Established Member
Joined
6 Dec 2010
Messages
2,761
Well isnt time someone bought some

Yeah I'm sure we can just pop down to our local show room and buy a couple.

On a serious note, bad idea having a smaller franchise. As it is now the profitable parts of the business effectively subsidise the non profit making part of the business (local services), now other than the farce that was cap and collar under the previous franchise agreement, the current Greater Western franchise requires no central government subsidy, yes there are one or two services that are sponsored locally, such as the additional Paignton shuttles, but a franchise that consisted of just the local stuff would need massive subsidy and cost the taxpayer a lot more, surely a backward step? Also having a large pool of units across the southwest allows for seasonal strengthening by units from Bristol coming down in the summer when the commuter trains are quieter, also using HST'S on summer unit diagrams etc, all flexibility that would be lost.
 

fgwrich

Established Member
Joined
15 Apr 2009
Messages
9,293
Location
Between Edinburgh and Exeter
Yeah I'm sure we can just pop down to our local show room and buy a couple.

On a serious note, bad idea having a smaller franchise. As it is now the profitable parts of the business effectively subsidise the non profit making part of the business (local services), now other than the farce that was cap and collar under the previous franchise agreement, the current Greater Western franchise requires no central government subsidy, yes there are one or two services that are sponsored locally, such as the additional Paignton shuttles, but a franchise that consisted of just the local stuff would need massive subsidy and cost the taxpayer a lot more, surely a backward step? Also having a large pool of units across the southwest allows for seasonal strengthening by units from Bristol coming down in the summer when the commuter trains are quieter, also using HST'S on summer unit diagrams etc, all flexibility that would be lost.

Fully agree with you on that one. The hard work that First Great Western has put into providing a better service really does show how bad it was previously with Wessex Trains - Service Frequency Increases and Better Timed Connections which now exist with FGW may be lost under another Micro Franchise, and I can't see the same level of summer strengthening happing under a separate franchise. Wessex was ok at the time, but I certainly feel it's better as it is now as part of the Greater Western franchise, accountable and under the control of FGW.

Equally, I know this idea is being mooted by Osbourne & co, but if we see enough micro managing & meddling from the 'We don't Micromanage' DfT, I dread to think how a micro franchise would compare against the clout of FGW or DfT - The South West already lost enough unit's the last time round the DfT intervened with the franchise and tried to Spec the Branches.

After all, if it aint broke, why try to fix it?
 

Oliver

Member
Joined
17 Aug 2007
Messages
476
I would hazard a guess that any leasing company building (decent) DMUs today would get a full return (and then some) on their investment, the railways/politicians don't really do long term strategy and I reckon a large numbers of DMUs will still be around in 30 years time!

You may well be right, but as you say, that's a guess. On the other hand if you're a train leasing company, would you spend quite a few million pounds building new trains for a TOC with a relatively short franchise and no money to spend, and being dependent on a DfT agreeing to include your trains in a current or future franchise?
 

pemma

Veteran Member
Joined
23 Jan 2009
Messages
31,474
Location
Knutsford
So what rolling stock would DfT plan for such a franchise - Pacers, converted D78s and 150s to prevent a high subsidy?
 

irish_rail

Established Member
Joined
30 Oct 2013
Messages
3,884
Location
Plymouth
Another downside - loss of crew flexibility. Currently HSS drivers at Penzance , Plymouth and Exeter all sign both HSTs and Sprinters. Separate the two franchises, and that flexibility is gone, meaning additional traincrew will be required, so yet more cost.

All in all, a really poor idea.
 

3141

Established Member
Joined
1 Apr 2012
Messages
1,772
Location
Whitchurch, Hampshire
So what rolling stock would DfT plan for such a franchise - Pacers, converted D78s and 150s to prevent a high subsidy?

There are several shorter branch lines on which D78s with a maximum speed of 60 mph would work perfectly well, so it would be a way of increasing the number of diesel units in service.

But it's not necessary to set up a mini-franchise, with all the disadvantages mentioned earlier, to achieve that.
 

21C101

Established Member
Joined
19 Jul 2014
Messages
2,556
Will there not be more DMUs than you can shake a stick at within a few years when the Scottish, Midland, Northwest and Great Western electrification is done?
 

RPI

Established Member
Joined
6 Dec 2010
Messages
2,761
Will there not be more DMUs than you can shake a stick at within a few years when the Scottish, Midland, Northwest and Great Western electrification is done?

There will be more but don't forget that pacers make up a large percentage of them and they have to be gone by 2020 (although there are rumours of life extentions for them which are covered in other threads....... please God let that not happen)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top