DarloRich
Veteran Member
Hence people would undergo a medical. Long term, poor lifestyle choices are easily detected in that way. Emergency situations requiring ambulances, A&E departments and immediate treatment would continue to be provided by the state. There is little practical or fair way of charging for such incidents.
but poor lifestyle choice is a difficult one. Who has made a poor lifestyle choice: the ptsd suffering soldier or the homeless person who has turned to substances after a long and unpleasant life?
I am against any form of insurance based health cover as I feel the only winners are the insurance companies and the richest in society. I feel that we as a country can (and should) afford the costs of the national health service. We ALL have to pay our rightful share of taxes though...........
PS I know my awful left wing tenancies are coming out with this thread but I do value the concept and service offered by the NHS immeasurably and feel it is something we should be praising and protecting rather than allowing constant attacks, chipping away and run downs as part of what seems like an inexorable slide to privitastion that wont benefit us real people one iota. Those who do benefit will be the the fund managers, tax avoiders and bankers who fund the Tory party. As Private Eye would say: trebles all round!
Last edited: