richieb1971
Established Member
- Joined
- 28 Jan 2013
- Messages
- 1,981
I thought the Bletchley flyover was mostly the reason the EWR project was financially viable in the first place. To replace most of it seems to have eradicated any advantage it gave in the first place.
I guess it was in poor condition for trains to go over it, rather than trains go under it. Or did the EWR team just find out its a liability on both fronts?
I guess it was in poor condition for trains to go over it, rather than trains go under it. Or did the EWR team just find out its a liability on both fronts?