• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

EC First Class Mark 3 (125) v Mark 4 (225) carriage

Status
Not open for further replies.

errata

Member
Joined
21 May 2011
Messages
25
Hi all,

I shall shortly be moving to Scotland and travelling to London every other weekend.

I am about to book my first few sets of tickets with East Coast for first class travel. Does anyone know what the difference is between first class carriage in the Mark 3 carriages on the Intercity 125s versus the Mark 4 carriages on the 225s?

I am a great fan of the Mark 3s and love the oversized seating in first class; but have never travelled on a Mark 4 service. I know that on some East Coast services, particularly the ones to Aberdeen, I am guaranteed a Mark 3. Is there much between them?

Thanks in advance for your responses.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

ainsworth74

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Global Moderator
Joined
16 Nov 2009
Messages
27,686
Location
Redcar
There is almost literally no difference between them. There is a slightly different layout on the Mark 4 as there is a large area in the middle of the carriage for trolleys and people to pass each other, but in terms of seating style they are identical.

To get an idea of the different layouts you can find the Mark 4 seating plan here and the Mark 3 plan here.
 

Max

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Administrator
Joined
8 Jun 2005
Messages
5,457
Location
Cambridge
In First Class, from experience, there is very little difference internally. The only thing I can think of off-hand is that the MK4 carriages are likely to feel a little bit more 'worn' as they were refurbished a while ago now.
 

errata

Member
Joined
21 May 2011
Messages
25
Thanks, so would you say EC first class is in general better than Virgin? I will be travelling from Stirling so there is not much difference in travelling to GLC or EDB.
 

ainsworth74

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Global Moderator
Joined
16 Nov 2009
Messages
27,686
Location
Redcar
Interior wise I prefer the both the EC trains layouts over the VT layouts so would pick EC in that regard. In terms of catering it depends what time you're travelling. Both are complementary now so nothing in it there. Both breakfast offerings are good though if your getting a Voyager (VT to Birmingham) then EC's is better. During the day I would also say they're about the same with EC probably edging it in my opinion. However on an evening VT's services to London will offer a far better meal than is offered on EC (but again Voyager's to Birmingham won't be as good).

So on the whole probably best bet is EC but if your travelling south on an evening pick VT as they offer a proper evening meal which EC don't (though they do offer evening meals northbound from Kings Cross).
 

route:oxford

Established Member
Joined
1 Nov 2008
Messages
4,949
Thanks, so would you say EC first class is in general better than Virgin? I will be travelling from Stirling so there is not much difference in travelling to GLC or EDB.

There is one major difference...

There are usually 3 trains an hour between Glasgow & Stirling and only 2 trains an hour between Edinburgh & Stirling.

More importantly, there are still 2 trains an hour until the last servce at 23:48 from Glasgow whereas Edinburgh-Stirling goes hourly at 20:30.

It's also a step-free walk between Queen Street & Central - which means it's easier to negotiate a wheeled case between the two stations instead of up and down the busy & narrow stairs at Waverley

Don't forget, Stirling enjoys 2 direct services to London per day. The Highland Chieftan at 10:30(ish) and the Sleeper.
 

jopsuk

Veteran Member
Joined
13 May 2008
Messages
12,773
You don't always have to go over the bridge at Waverly, and there are lifts. Changing at Waverly is a damn sight less hassle than walking between Queen Street and Central, suggesting otherwise is preposterous.
 

route:oxford

Established Member
Joined
1 Nov 2008
Messages
4,949
You don't always have to go over the bridge at Waverly, and there are lifts. Changing at Waverly is a damn sight less hassle than walking between Queen Street and Central, suggesting otherwise is preposterous.

It's no hassle changing at Weegieland. A brisk 4 minute walk between the stations.

And you are right, you don't *always* have to use the overbridge. Just usually.

I suppose it all depends on what the OP wants when he arrives at the Scottish Terminus...

Just miss the Dunblane at Edinburgh? Thats a 59 minute wait until the next one then 55 minutes until back at Stirling.

Just miss the Aberdeen/Inverness/Perth/Dunblane/Alloa at Glasgow, then just around half an hour to the next one and between 25&40 minutes until back in Stirling.
 

DaveNewcastle

Established Member
Joined
21 Dec 2007
Messages
7,387
Location
Newcastle (unless I'm out)
I must say that I find the comfort and peace in 1st on EC more enjoyable due to the physical space that they provide. Yes, ainsworth74 is correct in identifying the wide 'dance floor' space in the middle of the MkIV's but due to the fact that loadings in 1st are generally light, then I always choose to sit a t a table for 4 knowing that I'll be the only occupant for the entire journey. (Actually, I'm usually the only occupant of the 4 plus the 2 on the other side!).

But be warned, the booking system on EC puts all/most pax on ADV in coach M. There's usually lots of people cramed in there, far from the kitchen. My advice is to sit in K next to the kitchen. Usually with about 3 other passengers and first served from the kitchen!
 

ainsworth74

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Global Moderator
Joined
16 Nov 2009
Messages
27,686
Location
Redcar
Yes, ainsworth74 is correct in identifying the wide 'dance floor' space in the middle of the MkIV's

Never heard to it referred to as a 'dance floor' brilliant name for it :lol:

But be warned, the booking system on EC puts all/most pax on ADV in coach M.

I've fallen foul of that a few times myself in the past, however the new manual seat selection of EC seems to up and working now (at first it didn't actually change your seat even if you selected a different one!) so it should be possible to avoid M altogether as you can specify a seat wherever you like now.
 

sprinterguy

Established Member
Joined
4 Mar 2010
Messages
11,065
Location
Macclesfield
I've fallen foul of that a few times myself in the past, however the new manual seat selection of EC seems to up and working now (at first it didn't actually change your seat even if you selected a different one!) so it should be possible to avoid M altogether as you can specify a seat wherever you like now.
The EC seat selection system wasn't working for me about a fortnight ago when I booked a first class ticket for travel later this month, I had exactly the same problem as you have had. :(
 

ainsworth74

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Global Moderator
Joined
16 Nov 2009
Messages
27,686
Location
Redcar
Hmm interesting, it worked for me four or five weeks ago for a journey I'm undertaking next week.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top