• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

First Great Western to be renamed/reliveried?

Status
Not open for further replies.

bnm

Established Member
Joined
12 Oct 2009
Messages
4,996
At a rail user group meeting in Wiltshire last month, Ian Mundy, First Great Western's Publications Manager, said that the company was to be 'renamed' and to get a new livery.

As far as I'm aware (I didn't attend, so I'm only going on second hand info) there was no timescale mentioned for this, but logically it would happen some time during the current franchise extension period.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

YorkshireBear

Established Member
Joined
23 Jul 2010
Messages
8,692
Someone mentioned that the new 350s would get a new livery. Maybe First are changing their image? It would not surprise me if they start to remove their name from things. Some passengers think quite badly of First overheard quite a few passengers on TPE saying can't believe they were going to let First run WC.
 

VP185

Member
Joined
13 Feb 2010
Messages
344
As staff we've heard this rumour but not had any confirmation. We heard they will drop the 'First' name and be known as 'Great Western'. As long as they don't come up with something stupid such as 'Horizon Trains' like they intended for the WCML.
I always thought that trains had to carry the operators name ie Stagecoach, National Express etc but I may be wrong.

I know there's an HST set up at Kilmarnock (I think), I don't know if it's back yet but it will be interesting to see if it will receive a new livery
 

bb21

Emeritus Moderator
Joined
4 Feb 2010
Messages
24,151
I always thought that trains had to carry the operators name ie Stagecoach, National Express etc but I may be wrong.

Do they? EMT is simply EMT, not Stagecoach East Midlands Trains. SWT at one stage were called Stagecoach SWT, but are now simply South West Trains.
 

VP185

Member
Joined
13 Feb 2010
Messages
344
I always thought, or was led to believe, 'One' was rebranded because the DfT told them thr train had to carry the 'National Express' name.
Come to think of it, CrossCountry doesn't carry the Arriva name either! Just ignore me!
 

Eagle

Established Member
Joined
20 Feb 2011
Messages
7,106
Location
Leamingrad / Blanfrancisco
No, One was rebranded NXEA at the same time as NXEC started (which is odd, because the eight or ten franchises they'd held before then had never needed branding like that).

Then a couple of years later c2c started adding NX branding to its trains, although its name still remains just c2c.

SWT at one stage were called Stagecoach SWT, but are now simply South West Trains.

That was absolutely ages ago though (1997ish?).
 

Suraggu

Member
Joined
23 Oct 2013
Messages
964
Location
The Far North
I to have heard the rumour of First being dropped from the FGW brand.
As a current staff member at FGW it wouldn't bother me at all. Its just a slight name change.

Great Western will always be Great Western.
 

Class377/5

Established Member
Joined
19 Jun 2010
Messages
5,594
TPE have already started that they have a new livery lined up but was holding back for the next franchise but once extended they were considering putting the 350 fleet straight into it.

Remember we've already seen the new livery that the 365 are proposed to go into from next year which is the same as the class 700. What's important here is that the 700 images show ThamesLink (DfT always put in a L instead of a l) where as the 365s show CapitalConnect.

There is of course the possibility that the DfT have specified a standard livery for all new franchise extensions and direct awards.

Not forgetting that First are using the Scottish livery not thier own for Scotrail.
 
Last edited:

PG

Established Member
Joined
12 Oct 2010
Messages
2,858
Location
at the end of the high and low roads
Not forgetting that First are using the Scottish livery not thier own for Scotrail.

Think that's to do with an edict from the Scottish government that new trains and current stock due for repaint will henceforth be in ScotRail colours so won't be repainted every time the franchise passes to another operator.
 

Tetchytyke

Veteran Member
Joined
12 Sep 2013
Messages
13,305
Location
Isle of Man
Scotrail is branded using a Scottish Government livery and brand, any operator taking on the TOC has to use the same one. I think that's a good idea, just as all London bus operators have to use the same livery.

As for First rebranding, that wouldn't surprise me. First have been reducing their corporate brand and highlighting local brands in their bus division for ages, possibly seeing the success Go Ahead have had doing the same thing. For it to be extended to the trains would make sense, especially given the brand reputation of "Worst Late Western" and "Worst Crapital Connect".
 

Xenophon PCDGS

Veteran Member
Joined
17 Apr 2011
Messages
32,426
Location
A semi-rural part of north-west England
TPE have already started that they have a new livery lined up but was holding back for the next franchise but once extended they were considering putting the 350 fleet straight into it.

First TPE are sensible in not trying to give their new rolling stock a new image livery until we actually know who the new franchise will be given to.

A wag was recently heard to venture the opinion if the Rail North franchise project was handed over to the PTE in that area, every item of rolling stock would be given new yellow and pale grey vinyls.....of the Manchester Metrolink livery..:D
 

jon0844

Veteran Member
Joined
1 Feb 2009
Messages
28,059
Location
UK
Think that's to do with an edict from the Scottish government that new trains and current stock due for repaint will henceforth be in ScotRail colours so won't be repainted every time the franchise passes to another operator.

I'd like to see that for the whole of the UK. I have no issue with a private operator running a specific service, but feel the public would prefer (and be less confused by) standard liveries for trains, standard colour schemes and signage at stations and so on.

There would be nothing to stop a private operator having its logo somewhere on the front/rear carriage (near the cab) or on easily changed posters inside.

(Actually, it wouldn't be that bad to still have a company name on easily removed vinyls on the whole of the train).

I'd have one design for 'normal' trains and one for Intercity services, re-introduce the yellow stripe for first class and, possibly, use the opportunity to think of other clever things like some sort of markings to signify areas for wheelchairs or bikes etc.
 

YorkshireBear

Established Member
Joined
23 Jul 2010
Messages
8,692
I'd like to see that for the whole of the UK. I have no issue with a private operator running a specific service, but feel the public would prefer (and be less confused by) standard liveries for trains, standard colour schemes and signage at stations and so on.

There would be nothing to stop a private operator having its logo somewhere on the front/rear carriage (near the cab) or on easily changed posters inside.

(Actually, it wouldn't be that bad to still have a company name on easily removed vinyls on the whole of the train).

I'd have one design for 'normal' trains and one for Intercity services, re-introduce the yellow stripe for first class and, possibly, use the opportunity to think of other clever things like some sort of markings to signify areas for wheelchairs or bikes etc.

I agree. This could be helpful if TPE and Northern Merge with TPE stock taking on a different colour scheme and branding.
 

507 001

Established Member
Joined
3 Dec 2008
Messages
1,868
Location
Huyton
Think that's to do with an edict from the Scottish government that new trains and current stock due for repaint will henceforth be in ScotRail colours so won't be repainted every time the franchise passes to another operator.

I'd like to see that for the whole of the UK. I have no issue with a private operator running a specific service, but feel the public would prefer (and be less confused by) standard liveries for trains, standard colour schemes and signage at stations and so on.

There would be nothing to stop a private operator having its logo somewhere on the front/rear carriage (near the cab) or on easily changed posters inside.

(Actually, it wouldn't be that bad to still have a company name on easily removed vinyls on the whole of the train).

I'd have one design for 'normal' trains and one for Intercity services, re-introduce the yellow stripe for first class and, possibly, use the opportunity to think of other clever things like some sort of markings to signify areas for wheelchairs or bikes etc.

I agree.
The only problem I can think of is when you get people with TOC specific tickets, I.e. LM only, getting on other TOC's services because they didn't see the logo/couldn't tell.
 

jon0844

Veteran Member
Joined
1 Feb 2009
Messages
28,059
Location
UK
Southern's red stripes beside the door on electrostars for Bikes/Wheelchairs works well

As long as it's standardised, such that you could go anywhere in the UK and know what's what (rather than needing to know what each TOC does).
 

Zoe

Established Member
Joined
22 Aug 2008
Messages
5,905
I'd like to see that for the whole of the UK. I have no issue with a private operator running a specific service, but feel the public would prefer (and be less confused by) standard liveries for trains, standard colour schemes and signage at stations and so on.
So you'd include NI Railways in this standard livery scheme?
 
Last edited:

jon0844

Veteran Member
Joined
1 Feb 2009
Messages
28,059
Location
UK
So you'd include NI Railways in this standard livery scheme?

Why not? And why not Scotland too? (That's assuming it doesn't vote for independence).

I admit I don't know much about how things run in NI, so if we have to stick to England and Wales for now, so be it.
 

nrturner

Member
Joined
19 Jun 2013
Messages
25
Location
Calderdale
My theory, based on nothing but my own guesswork, is that DfT may have asked FGW to use a more generic livery for any trains that require a repaint, since it's a short contract to last until re-franchising. A bit like East Coast and the generic livery that the 700s will have.
 

jon0844

Veteran Member
Joined
1 Feb 2009
Messages
28,059
Location
UK
Isn't FGW now on a management contract, and FCC about to go the same way for a while - hence the new CapitalConnect livery (and the name is presumably just stuck on to the grey/silver trains so easily changed at any time)?

The whole franchising thing is a bit of a mess at the moment, but given so many franchises are due soon - and the plan is for longer ones - I'd really, really like for the Government to use this opportunity to start doing away with letting operators brand trains/stations/posters/signs and go for a uniform, BR-style, identity.

This is NOT the same as suggesting renationalisation.

You have to start somewhere, so let this be the beginning (crosses fingers!).
 

VP185

Member
Joined
13 Feb 2010
Messages
344
The FGW Turbos when they go through works are to have all vinyl livery removed as this is apparently causing damage to the bodywork of the train.

First technically didn't get a franchise extension as such. The current franchise is being run as a 'management contract' and that, in the opinion of several people, is why 'First' name might be dropped. There was rumour at the time the set going through works would receive an all over Grey colour scheme as specified by the DfT but that rumour seems to died a death.
I suppose specifying a base colour for all franchises would save the government a few quid when the whole system is re-nationalised!!!!! :D
 

LNW-GW Joint

Veteran Member
Joined
22 Feb 2011
Messages
19,706
Location
Mold, Clwyd
The whole franchising thing is a bit of a mess at the moment, but given so many franchises are due soon - and the plan is for longer ones - I'd really, really like for the Government to use this opportunity to start doing away with letting operators brand trains/stations/posters/signs and go for a uniform, BR-style, identity.

Branding for ECML (the future East Coast operator) will be up to the bidders.
All costs are down to the bidder.
No specific DfT brand is specified.

from DfT ECML Prospectus
Bidders will be encouraged to propose solutions that minimise the transitional
costs at the end of the franchise. For example bidders may propose a modular
brand approach whereby the parent company name can be removed in isolation
from trains and stations leaving the remainder of the brand identity in place.
 

YorkshireBear

Established Member
Joined
23 Jul 2010
Messages
8,692
With the ECML doesn't the franchise have to offer the brand at a reasonable price to the successor?
 

thedbdiboy

Member
Joined
10 Sep 2011
Messages
960
Given that virtually everything else they do is regulated, what colour they paint their trains is about the only thing that's left up to the TOCs these days.

The FGW HSTs have been reliveried so many times since privatisation I'm surprised that they're still in gauge - if they peel enough vinyls off I think it still says 'Great Western' under there somewhere...
 

VP185

Member
Joined
13 Feb 2010
Messages
344
The last paint job the FGW HSTs had was done good & proper which is why they're still in quite good nick and are easier to keep clean. Very little corrosion is evident on the bodywork. The same can't be said for the Greater Anglia MkIII's which looks like NX opted to paint over the rust!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top