• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

First Rail Stirling (Lumo) Rolling Stock

Status
Not open for further replies.

The Middle

Member
Joined
18 Jun 2022
Messages
126
Location
Uk
Or perhaps a deal will be done, and First and Scotrail may be compensated. It wouldn't be the first time that stock transfers have been fudged due to new stock being late.
If they were being transferred to another DFT TOC then perhaps. However neither First or ScotRail fall into that category.

Whether we like it or not I think the privately owned ROSCOs will care very little whether the government is embarrassed or not. They, after all only answer to their share holders and will place their assets wherever they think is most beneficial.

I would not be surprised to see 170s being put to work down to St. Pancras before the end of the year.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

DanNCL

Established Member
Joined
17 Jul 2017
Messages
5,002
Location
County Durham
It might well be possible to maintain the full fleet at a depot near Stirling, meaning it isn't a micro fleet, and then ScotRail might take them once Lumo have finished with them?
Haymarket could be an option. Only other one I can think of is Inverness which would work for ScotRail but is almost certainly too far north for Lumo.

The electric rights still exist. Those rights can be resold or used for other purposes, so whilst they are not currently being used - you can't work around them, as the rights holder can, if they wish, start running electric services again whenever they fancy.

Large swathes of the WCML network north of Crewe should be essentially considered as no longer AC electrified for new services.
That’s ridiculous, especially in the case of the Royal Mail paths which will never run again as the units have been scrapped. DB should be forced to either use electric traction in the paths they have electric rights for or hand back their rights. Hopefully GBR once Network Rail is absorbed into them will sort that out.

Commendable optimism from First Group that they'll have 222s this year. Latest attributable comment we have on the 810s is based on a Facebook post by Neil O'Brien, the MP for Harborough & Wigston.



The general consensus from what I hope are informed commentators here is that the 810 programme is not going well, and that the the 222 fleet is intensively utilized / over-stretched. This means handing any 222s over to First or Scotrail before the 810s are match fit could have a pretty much instant, public and painful impact on EMR's intercity operation. So if you're thinking Autumn, I would suggest imagining dark December days just before the winter solstice. Or he may have meant Autumn 2026.

Post in class 810 thread
If the 222s are off lease the progress of the 810s is irrelevant. They will be handed back to to the ROSCO whether there are units ready to replace them or not
Rail services are very political, so it's not irrelevant if the EMR IC service collapses. Opposition MPs along the route will start howling and asking awkward, embarrassing questions at PMQs, showing that the Government is not competent to manage the railways, and by extension, many other parts of the public sector.

Perhaps Sec of State Alexander and Rail Minister Hendy will allow this to happen to their boss.

However, perhaps First starting recruitment actually means that there is growing confidence that enough 810s will be in service to start releasing 222s, meaning Peter Hendy's optimism is well informed and this forum's cynicism is misplaced.

Or perhaps a deal will be done, and First and Scotrail may be compensated. It wouldn't be the first time that stock transfers have been fudged due to new stock being late.
The MML Intercity service won’t be allowed to collapse for political reasons. If the 810s get delayed yet again there would likely be government intervention to extend EMR’s lease on the 222s and compensation paid to ScotRail and/or Lumo, hopefully with Hitachi getting the bill swing as it’s their late deliveries that would cause this to happen.

They will be using the 350/2's from WMR.
Is this confirmed?

350/2s for First Stirling or EMR?
Considering the wires don’t even reach Leicester, I’d expect it to be Lumo, assuming the poster in question was correct.

If they were being transferred to another DFT TOC then perhaps. However neither First or ScotRail fall into that category.

Whether we like it or not I think the privately owned ROSCOs will care very little whether the government is embarrassed or not. They, after all only answer to their share holders and will place their assets wherever they think is most beneficial.

I would not be surprised to see 170s being put to work down to St. Pancras before the end of the year.
ScotRail is still public sector even though it’s devolved. That will have some clout.

I would be surprised to see 170s back at St Pancras.
 

The Middle

Member
Joined
18 Jun 2022
Messages
126
Location
Uk
ScotRail is still public sector even though it’s devolved. That will have some clout
So I'll turn that argument back on you and ask why should the people and government of Scotland be deprived of new (to them) units just because EMR/Hitachi are failing to introduce their new units when they expected?

They will be using the 350/2's from WMR
See below
The Lumo Stirling operation requires 30 cars - 5 x 6 car. The first cl.222 is due off EMR (much) later this year.
This is the definitive answer from a credible source so not sure why the 350/2 rumour is still being given any credence.
 
Last edited:

Tazi Hupefi

Established Member
Joined
1 Apr 2018
Messages
1,573
Location
Nottinghamshire
The 350/2 are temporarily reserved (in their entirety) pending the outcome of negotiations for a "proper" TOC.

The ROSCO wants them to be taken all together, and is reluctant to split the 350/2 fleet.

They won't be going to an open access operator.
 

Clarence Yard

Established Member
Joined
18 Dec 2014
Messages
2,915
Stop speculating about 350/2 units. Lumo is not using them and has never been interested in using them, despite what someone has written in one of the comics.

It is cl.222 units and the maintenance arrangements for them are being sorted out now.
 

DanNCL

Established Member
Joined
17 Jul 2017
Messages
5,002
Location
County Durham
So I'll turn that argument back on you and ask why should the people and government of Scotland be deprived of new (to them) units just because EMR/Hitachi are failing to introduce their new units when they expected?
Because the service doesn’t fall apart in Scotland if the ‘new’ fleet is delayed as the HSTs can stay for longer, whereas it does fall apart on the MML unless either the 222s stay there longer or the 810s suddenly enter service en masse.
 

Meerkat

Established Member
Joined
14 Jul 2018
Messages
9,208
The way the wind is blowing the government could strongly suggest that First forcing EMR to lose the Cl222s early would cause such an anti OA fuss that they might be rather concerned about their operation only lasting the five(?) years they currently have contracted. I'm sure Sir Humphrey could phrase it in a strong but not illegal hint format!
 

800001

Established Member
Joined
24 Oct 2015
Messages
5,229
The way the wind is blowing the government could strongly suggest that First forcing EMR to lose the Cl222s early would cause such an anti OA fuss that they might be rather concerned about their operation only lasting the five(?) years they currently have contracted. I'm sure Sir Humphrey could phrase it in a strong but not illegal hint format!
First will have no control over when or if they get the 222s, that will be down to the leasing company.

However, we do not know if First have already signed a contract to take on so many of the 222s, and if so, what dates etc to receive them.
 

Meerkat

Established Member
Joined
14 Jul 2018
Messages
9,208
First will have no control over when or if they get the 222s, that will be down to the leasing company.

However, we do not know if First have already signed a contract to take on so many of the 222s, and if so, what dates etc to receive them.
First do have some control - if they don't insist on taking them then the leasing company are less likely to take them away from EMR
 

matchmaker

Established Member
Joined
8 Mar 2009
Messages
1,674
Location
Central Scotland
It might well be possible to maintain the full fleet at a depot near Stirling, meaning it isn't a micro fleet, and then ScotRail might take them once Lumo have finished with them?
There was a lot of local opposition when a depot was proposed near Stirling prior to the introduction of the 385s.
 

YorkshireBear

Established Member
Joined
23 Jul 2010
Messages
9,086
So I'll turn that argument back on you and ask why should the people and government of Scotland be deprived of new (to them) units just because EMR/Hitachi are failing to introduce their new units when they expected?


See below

This is the definitive answer from a credible source so not sure why the 350/2 rumour is still being given any credence.
why should the midland mainline be left with no trains just to the people of Scotland can have some slightly newer trains slightly earlier?
 

Davester50

Member
Joined
22 Feb 2021
Messages
856
Location
UK
why should the midland mainline be left with no trains just to the people of Scotland can have some slightly newer trains slightly earlier?

Why should our unreliable trains remain in service because the MML can't get their act together. They could take the wonderful HSTs ScotRail in a temporary measure.
 

The Middle

Member
Joined
18 Jun 2022
Messages
126
Location
Uk
Because the service doesn’t fall apart in Scotland if the ‘new’ fleet is delayed as the HSTs can stay for longer, whereas it does fall apart on the MML unless either the 222s stay there longer or the 810s suddenly enter service en masse.

why should the midland mainline be left with no trains just to the people of Scotland can have some slightly newer trains slightly earlier?

I still haven't seen an argument as to why it is the responsibility of a private ROSCO, Open Access Operator or Scottish Government to bail out EMR/Hitachi?

The reality is the units will be placed where they offer the best return on investment for the ROSCO and if contracts are already signed then those will be honoured.
 

hexagon789

Veteran Member
Joined
2 Sep 2016
Messages
16,938
Location
Glasgow
I still haven't seen an argument as to why it is the responsibility of a private ROSCO, Open Access Operator or Scottish Government to bail out EMR/Hitachi?

The reality is the units will be placed where they offer the best return on investment for the ROSCO and if contracts are already signed then those will be honoured.
There are no contracts signed with ScotRail.
 

hexagon789

Veteran Member
Joined
2 Sep 2016
Messages
16,938
Location
Glasgow
But the training Academy are currently "Scotrailising" class 222 traction manuals. Hmmmmm
Oh I'm well aware advanced discussions have been had and I doubt many, if anyone, read the thinly veiled expression for interest as referring to anything other than the 222s; the point remains - only LUMO/First Stirling Trains have reached the contract stage.
 

43096

On Moderation
Joined
23 Nov 2015
Messages
16,720
Why should our unreliable trains remain in service because the MML can't get their act together. They could take the wonderful HSTs ScotRail in a temporary measure.
Why should the MML suffer because ScotRail is so inept that it can't get trains working reliably (that have worked reliably for years elsewhere) that it signed up to until 2030.

See, that argument cuts both ways.
 

YorkshireBear

Established Member
Joined
23 Jul 2010
Messages
9,086
I still haven't seen an argument as to why it is the responsibility of a private ROSCO, Open Access Operator or Scottish Government to bail out EMR/Hitachi?

The reality is the units will be placed where they offer the best return on investment for the ROSCO and if contracts are already signed then those will be honoured.
Because it's a national network not a national free for all. The damage to the industry of just cancelling all MML intercity services would be enormous. Financial and reputational. If we were talking a few units (the LUMO ones) this is differently as it will lead to disruption rather than outright cancellation of the entire service.

The industry shouldn't be run for the TOCS to fight each other via ROSCOs it needs to be coordinated for best use of resources to make the industry balance sheet healthier. And sticking two fingers up at EMR and saying your problem doesn't do that.

Now if Hitachi delays cause significant delays to trains for ScotRail (assuming LUMO ones go as planned) then I would say ScotRail deserve significant portion of the compensation. But we cannot advocate on this forum surely for TOCs just fighting each other for stock in the name of ROSCO free will!
 

Davester50

Member
Joined
22 Feb 2021
Messages
856
Location
UK
Why should the MML suffer because ScotRail is so inept that it can't get trains working reliably (that have worked reliably for years elsewhere) that it signed up to until 2030.

See, that argument cuts both ways.
You're a bit late. That point was previously made.
 

John Bishop

Member
Joined
15 Nov 2018
Messages
636
Location
Perth
Oh I'm well aware advanced discussions have been had and I doubt many, if anyone, read the thinly veiled expression for interest as referring to anything other than the 222s; the point remains - only LUMO/First Stirling Trains have reached the contract stage.
I’m not quite sure you can say this honestly unless you’re at Director level or above in Scotrail or indeed the leasing company. There will be commercial sensitivity involved in the contract process, which all but those directly involved are not privy to Until such times as an official statement is made.
 

Snow1964

Established Member
Joined
7 Oct 2019
Messages
8,095
Location
West Wiltshire
why should the midland mainline be left with no trains just to the people of Scotland can have some slightly newer trains slightly earlier?
The trains are privately owned by a Rosco, if you owned them and Lumo said we want them for X years and prepared to pay £Y, then MML come along and say can we have them for an unknown number of weeks (at a price which might not match £Y) which offer would you take.

If MML loses them due to its failure to put replacements into service, has to take the blame (even if ultimately was a bad decision 6 years ago to get new design train)
 

Blindtraveler

Established Member
Joined
28 Feb 2011
Messages
10,408
Location
Nowhere near enough to a Pacer :(
A point which may have been made and I haven't read the whole thread, but given lumo sells itself on being electric and green and a good alternative to anything that uses diesel, be it another company's train, a car, a couch or an aircraft. Isn't it going to be the sheer height of potentially reputation? Ruining hypocrisy to fling diesels between London and sterling under all those lovely wires?
 

TT-ONR-NRN

Veteran Member
Joined
30 Dec 2016
Messages
11,544
Location
Salford Quays, Manchester
A point which may have been made and I haven't read the whole thread, but given lumo sells itself on being electric and green and a good alternative to anything that uses diesel, be it another company's train, a car, a couch or an aircraft. Isn't it going to be the sheer height of potentially reputation? Ruining hypocrisy to fling diesels between London and sterling under all those lovely wires?
A diesel train is still greener than a car. But yes. It's ironic.
 

Suraggu

Member
Joined
23 Oct 2013
Messages
1,001
Location
The Far North
Looking at the sticker, I'd recommend a rake of stock with a total ETH of 96 or less.

Isn't it the control type that's important rather than the DVT? The original DVTs were fitted with TDM (I always want to call it "Time Distort Matrix) and the Chiltern's are fitted with AAR. Not sure what variety (if any) the 93s have.
They are fitted with Stadlers own multiple working system.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top