My suggestion for a change for next year: sprint-only engines!Though i can see backmarkers parking cars before the end and claim it was reliability related to save on engine mileage and with reguards to the cost cap.
My suggestion for a change for next year: sprint-only engines!Though i can see backmarkers parking cars before the end and claim it was reliability related to save on engine mileage and with reguards to the cost cap.
How does that fit with the cost-cap principle?My suggestion for a change for next year: sprint-only engines!
I don't think that one extra engine would be then end of the cost cap philosophy. Especially if they're allowed to use parts from the 'main' engines to replace ones on the sprint engine.How does that fit with the cost-cap principle?
So sports shouldn't happen when the TV fans are at work, got it. I wonder what all the people who travelled there to experience it live will do instead?Well, live qualifying is at 2pm today. Weirdly, I seem to be at work then. Perhaps I work strange hours and most other people are free...
Thanks for the gracious response. The TV audience is many orders of magnitude larger than the live audience and is where most of the sport’s income comes fromSo sports shouldn't happen when the TV fans are at work, got it. I wonder what all the people who travelled there to experience it live will do instead?
It's a problem when you have an international event.Thanks for the gracious response. The TV audience is many orders of magnitude larger than the live audience and is where most of the sport’s income comes from
It's the day rather than timezone that upset me. With Japan and Australia I can chose to get up early or not but Friday is a work day for the majority and I'd prefer it if they'd not messed around with the usual Sat-Sun format.It's a problem when you have an international event.
My understanding is that quali is at 6pm local, so getting into the evening.
What time do you think it should be to satisfy both the local conditions and the TV audience? How do you cope with the Japanese race (I seem to recall recording 94 as it was on at 4am or something stupid)
Yes. And the TV audience is also spread out around the world, so there are many fans for whom this time is perfectly acceptable.The TV audience is many orders of magnitude larger than the live audience and is where most of the sport’s income comes from
And I'd prefer it if Mila Kunis was my girlfriend.I'd prefer it if they'd not messed around with the usual Sat-Sun format.
The usual Sat-Sun format?It's the day rather than timezone that upset me. With Japan and Australia I can chose to get up early or not but Friday is a work day for the majority and I'd prefer it if they'd not messed around with the usual Sat-Sun format.
Personally, I think there are two many GPs already without adding a sprint and that it dilutes the impact of each race but I know not everyone feels that way (although I suspect most mechanics would agree!)
a few points if i may:Well, live qualifying is at 2pm today. Weirdly, I seem to be at work then. Perhaps I work strange hours and most other people are free...
I completely get the point about time zones. It's the DAY that upset me (which my post didn't make clear).a few points if i may:
- This is an international event with an international audience
- The race is being held in a forign country
- Baku is 3/4 hours ahead of the UK therefore qualification must be about tea time in Baku
- Meaning that darkness will interrupt proceedings if anything goes wrong in qualification if the session was held at UK friendly times
- The global TV audience is vast so which segment comes first? I would suggest NOT the UK! I suspect Liberty would prioritise USA viewers.
PS - just do what I do for the practice sessions. If you can, listen to BBC at work ( perhaps on the Q/T) via the BBC sport app and get coverage of the qualification OR do the old MOTD trick and record the session, look away now, and watch the action when you get home.
There's a remnant of that left over in the rules, if they're unable to run qualifying but they did manage a practice session they can use the times from that.The usual Sat-Sun format?
I much preferred the old format where Qualifying was on Friday and Saturday. If memory serves, the fastest times from either session determined the grid, so if Saturday was a washout then the grid was already set.
Weather good all weekend? Smashed your car up in Quali on Friday, give it another go on Saturday and sneak pole by 1/1000 second from the fastest time on Friday.
I think it's noticeable that some races in those foreign countries are run under lights to fit within the normal 'European' race times. I suspect Baku's race being in the middle of their city it's impractical to light it up that way.a few points if i may:
- This is an international event with an international audience
- The race is being held in a forign country
- Baku is 3/4 hours ahead of the UK therefore qualification must be about tea time in Baku
- Meaning that darkness will interrupt proceedings if anything goes wrong in qualification if the session was held at UK friendly times
- The global TV audience is vast so which segment comes first? I would suggest NOT the UK! I suspect Liberty would prioritise USA viewers.
PS - just do what I do for the practice sessions. If you can, listen to BBC at work ( perhaps on the Q/T) via the BBC sport app and get coverage of the qualification OR do the old MOTD trick and record the session, look away now, and watch the action when you get home.
i get that - i just don't think there is much they can do IF they want to run a sprint race on a Saturday AND produce some meaningful action over the whole weekend.It's the DAY that upset me (which my post didn't make clear).
You 'lose' one qualifying session, but gain another plus a whole extra race.I completely get the point about time zones. It's the DAY that upset me (which my post didn't make clear).
Let's just do away with Saturday!i get that - i just don't think there is much they can do IF they want to run a sprint race on a Saturday AND produce some meaningful action over the whole weekend.
As far as I can see from printed guides and the EPG, Channel 4 isn't showing highlights until Saturday evening anyway, in a combined programme with the sprint race. By that time whatever happened this afternoon will be pretty old news.I completely get the point about time zones. It's the DAY that upset me (which my post didn't make clear).
And, yes, I will watch the highlights later, having dodged news and social media (which is good for mental health in any case!)
I genuinely believe F1 was far better under Bernie Ecclestone. This endless quest to lengthen the F1 season to the point there isn't the time to watch every single race added to the sprint races which are giving away some of the Sunday surprise and adding dogs*** Tilkedrome tracks in the USA and the Arab countries to line Liberty's own pockets will kill the sport. All PPV and no terrestrial added to that will nail it into the ground. F1 has grown hugely this last few years with Drive to Survive and a social media drive and F1 TV but it risks reversing it's successes by reducing free coverage.As far as I can see from printed guides and the EPG, Channel 4 isn't showing highlights until Saturday evening anyway, in a combined programme with the sprint race. By that time whatever happened this afternoon will be pretty old news.
One might think Liberty are trying to push everyone onto streaming services - I foresee terrestrial coverage being pushed out altogether in favour of pay per view before long.
With the constantly changing formats and race decisions based on "exciting finishes" rather than fairness or the rules, it's barely worth watching anyway, so I'm not too bothered that I'm busy tomorrow and will miss both quali and sprint. No point recording it when I won't be able to watch it until the main race is over!
Norris? McLaren knew the rules and used the tyres to get a better slot for the main race imoAnd one of the drivers wasn't allowed to compete in the last ten because he didn't have any new tyres. The regulations get more and more incomprehensible.
Really? You do know the rules for the sprint races were only agreed on Wednesday last - the teams have been the ones messing about.As a side note, F1 is also underming itself and looking very Mickey Mouse by changing the rules mid season
Really? there isn't time to watch one 90 minute race every couple of weeks ( often a 90 minute race condensed down to much less on C4?)I genuinely believe F1 was far better under Bernie Ecclestone. This endless quest to lengthen the F1 season to the point there isn't the time to watch every single race
Or, perhaps, Liberty think they can erm "drive" the people Drive to Survive attracted to subscribe to premium services. Football hasn't died because it is mainly on PPV via Sky or BT and neither will F1. What will kill interest in F1 is dull racing and a lack of excitement or jeopardy, like Red Bull winning by 17 miles every week.F1 has grown hugely this last few years with Drive to Survive and a social media drive and F1 TV but it risks reversing it's successes by reducing free coverage.
Sure, but that's my point, the rules are incomprehensible to anyone "new" to watching, and they're tiresome to many of us who've been watching for years. We are where we are, but it doesn't seem like a good place to me. We're just too far removed from the concept of driving the best car fastest around the track as used to be the case - and I accept that the safety requirements today have to have some sort of impact of course.Norris? McLaren knew the rules and used the tyres to get a better slot for the main race imo
Agreed. Same with Merc up until the end of 2020.like Red Bull winning by 17 miles every week.
Because F1's rules have always been clear in the past...Sure, but that's my point, the rules are incomprehensible to anyone "new" to watching, and they're tiresome to many of us who've been watching for years.
I was referring to the wish to increase the season to 25 races and have racing nearly every weekend, because like many people I cannot or do not want to stay home every weekend. Like with football I don't watch every match just the bigger ones.Really? there isn't time to watch one 90 minute race every couple of weeks ( often a 90 minute race condensed down to much less on C4?)
Point taken.Or, perhaps, Liberty think they can erm "drive" the people Drive to Survive attracted to subscribe to premium services. Football hasn't died because it is mainly on PPV via Sky or BT and neither will F1. What will kill interest in F1 is dull racing and a lack of excitement or jeopardy, like Red Bull winning by 17 miles every week.
Quality of the punditary is important, C4 only have DC and Webber, Sky has Brundle, Hill, Button, Rosberg, Di Resta and Karun who are all ex F1 racers, winners or champions, I think that brings value to the Sky coverage - in fact it is rebroadcasted on other channels the world over, ESPN for the US, Canada etc. I like to hear the take on regulations, race lengths, whether a move was taking the mickey or fair play so I like hearing a debate too. The Brundle grid walk is hilarious at times as well and I always tune in in advance for it.As I always say - I have no Sky or BT. I watch C4 highlights when I can be bothered and otherwise listen, free, via Radio 5. I can listen to every session and their podcast. I don't feel I am missing out because i cant watch the race and listen to the hyperbole issued by Sky or c4 commentators. I actually feel more informed as the commentary needs to be more descriptive and time needs to be filled in more on radio than TV . I would LOVE coverage on BBC1 like the olden days but that isn't going to happen.
When the tyre rule was thought up the idea was that each driver would have a fresh set of new tyres to use. The Teams have discovered a loophole where there is no mention of saving tyres for the SQ3. This means if you want to prioritise the main race you can use up your tyres if you’re thinking you won’t get into the top 8 in the Sprint as the race scores to 10th.Have to say I do not fully understand the rationale behind the tyre rule in SQ3. Why can’t a competitor use a used set of softs or why can’t the teams be given a set like they are in Q3?
Something that reduces the spectacle of the sport (which this does by having less drivers racing for the top spot) is at odds with the entire point of the sprint imo.