Failed Unit
Established Member
A few have wondered if GN are penalty faring in the "1st" on the 387s
Answer is yes - have one.
View of the RPI - who was very good is appeal it.
They agreed that the coach wasn't well labelled and that you never know where first class is going to be. But they are getting a lot of complaints from 1st class passengers that the accommodation is generally ignored. Agree again that the reduction in seats is the main factor and the level of abuse is much lower on the 365s and 317s.
First fact is i am bang to rights. But is it worth making some noise on this. More to highlight the current situation with the 387s is not acceptable rather than dispute the PF. Many passengers commented they have no clue where to stand now. I will get it back by delay repay anyway - just claim every single 15 mins.
Btw. Only posting this as a few on the forum are interested if GN are really going to PF a coach where there is no difference in seats and labels. (Someone has even nicked the "first class white things from the seat back).
Answer is yes - have one.
View of the RPI - who was very good is appeal it.
They agreed that the coach wasn't well labelled and that you never know where first class is going to be. But they are getting a lot of complaints from 1st class passengers that the accommodation is generally ignored. Agree again that the reduction in seats is the main factor and the level of abuse is much lower on the 365s and 317s.
First fact is i am bang to rights. But is it worth making some noise on this. More to highlight the current situation with the 387s is not acceptable rather than dispute the PF. Many passengers commented they have no clue where to stand now. I will get it back by delay repay anyway - just claim every single 15 mins.
Btw. Only posting this as a few on the forum are interested if GN are really going to PF a coach where there is no difference in seats and labels. (Someone has even nicked the "first class white things from the seat back).
Last edited: