• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Hull Trains cancellations due to chronic shortage of available rolling stock

Status
Not open for further replies.

TUC

Established Member
Joined
11 Nov 2010
Messages
3,633
The trouble is that the travelling public get very used to stuff like automatic doors etc., and as has tragically been demonstrated on a HST between Bath & Bristol a few weeks ago, people genuinely do not appreciate the dangers that opening windows present.

I'd be willing to bet that, somewhere else on the UK rail network this week, some people have travelled on a HST for the first time and have managed just fine.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

dk1

Veteran Member
Joined
2 Oct 2009
Messages
16,092
Location
East Anglia
The trouble is that the travelling public get very used to stuff like automatic doors etc., and as has tragically been demonstrated on a HST between Bath & Bristol a few weeks ago, people genuinely do not appreciate the dangers that opening windows present.
I despair at people these days. Unless it's on an app on their phones the poor snowflakes will need to ring 999 for help in getting on/off a train :rolleyes:
 

cactustwirly

Established Member
Joined
10 Apr 2013
Messages
7,470
Location
UK
I despair at people these days. Unless it's on an app on their phones the poor snowflakes will need to ring 999 for help in getting on/off a train :rolleyes:

Tbf people struggle to open HST doors, even on existing HST routes
 

BrianB

Member
Joined
21 Jan 2018
Messages
111
So LNER will happily accept disrupted air passengers for free but not disrupted rail passengers for free. Kind of makes a mockery of the National Rail slogan which is 'Britain's train companies working together'
 
Last edited:

robbeech

Established Member
Joined
11 Nov 2015
Messages
4,681
On LNER's website today. So they will happily accept disrupted air passengers for free but not disrupted rail passengers for free. Kind of makes a mockery of the National Rail slogan which is 'Britain's train companies working together'

View attachment 56945

When was the last time they accepted disrupted air passengers at any time let alone less than a week before Christmas?

How many times have Hull Trains has to call on them in the last few months alone ?

How many times has a plane from Gatwick to Edinburgh or Inverness stopped half a dozen of LNER’s trains from running due to a failure?
 

HullRailMan

Member
Joined
8 Oct 2018
Messages
359
I imagine (but guess) this HST door issue has some health and safety reasoning behind it. The risk assessment for introducing a potentially unsafe practice would be greater than if it is already in service with that operator.
 

HullRailMan

Member
Joined
8 Oct 2018
Messages
359
When was the last time they accepted disrupted air passengers at any time let alone less than a week before Christmas?

How many times have Hull Trains has to call on them in the last few months alone ?

How many times has a plane from Gatwick to Edinburgh or Inverness stopped half a dozen of LNER’s trains from running due to a failure?
I think the point is that whosever train fails, be it HT, GC or LNER the best outcome for the rail passenger is for the industry to work together and offer a solution. The operator that accepts others tickets gets paid a substantial sum for doing so. Presumably they are not getting any revenue for carrying the air passengers today. Incidentally, if I bought a walk up fare today for potentially £200+ and found myself sat next to somebody travelling for free that wasn't even a rail passenger to begin with I would feel rather annoyed!
 

Polarbear

Established Member
Joined
24 May 2008
Messages
1,705
Location
Birkenhead
I'd be willing to bet that, somewhere else on the UK rail network this week, some people have travelled on a HST for the first time and have managed just fine.

Oh quite likely! I've managed with Mk3's since the mid 1970's with no issues, but on the other hand, there were instances back in the day with people fiddling with the doors & falling out of trains (Tamworth Triangle I think it was referred to). That got the interior handles removed & hence the reason for having to lean out to open the doors.
 

35B

Established Member
Joined
19 Dec 2011
Messages
2,296
I despair at people these days. Unless it's on an app on their phones the poor snowflakes will need to ring 999 for help in getting on/off a train :rolleyes:
While a friend's university student son was overcarried because he'd never previously encountered slam doors on a train, and I routinely observe people struggling to work them out whenever I travel on one. Not a question of snowflakes or despairing of people, just that many people lack familiarity and slam door trains are now a minority of trains. No different to my confusion at the SVR a couple of years ago when I first used ex GWR stock.
 

robbeech

Established Member
Joined
11 Nov 2015
Messages
4,681
I think the point is that whosever train fails, be it HT, GC or LNER the best outcome for the rail passenger is for the industry to work together and offer a solution. The operator that accepts others tickets gets paid a substantial sum for doing so. Presumably they are not getting any revenue for carrying the air passengers today. Incidentally, if I bought a walk up fare today for potentially £200+ and found myself sat next to somebody travelling for free that wasn't even a rail passenger to begin with I would feel rather annoyed!

I agree people should work together. And of course that’s not limited to the railway. But when it becomes so grossly one sided it becomes massively detrimental to the passengers that are on the booked service.

Whilst I appreciate this scenarios possibility is minimised by the new electronic seat reservations the following scenario is one from experience.

The 1233 fails on a 2 track section of the ecml causing chaos to all services travelling south. The 1548 is cancelled. Passengers for the 1548 are told by HT social media team to catch the 1603 to Doncaster on Platform 4 for onwards travel by bus. The train forming the 1603 arrives late due to being stuck behind the HT and there is no time to put out seat reservations. The HT passengers for the 1548 who are already at the station go to platform 4 and take any seat. The train is then announced on platform 4 and the people who have paid for that train get on to find they have to stand. Arguments ensue and there’s nothing LNER (vtec at the time) can do. Now I’ve only witnessed this in this extremeity once but it may have happened more. Of course there are multiple reasons why seat reservations might not work so the same thing is possible today. LNER cannot afford the reputation to sink as it’s not awfully good as it is. When this becomes a daily occurrence then it gets much worse.
Taking on the passengers for a couple of flights either way once in recent history is not the same as taking in passengers for 4 services per day for months.
 

_toommm_

Established Member
Joined
8 Jul 2017
Messages
5,862
Location
Yorkshire
This article about HT securing use of a Great Western 125 is laughable in how both the newspaper and, worse, HT, seem to treat a 125 as a potentially dangerous innovation https://www.hulldailymail.co.uk/new...ll-trains-secures-emergency-train-2346888.amp . I get the need to train on-train staff in the use of slam door stock but when Louise Cheeseman says:
'“With the slam-door stock, you can actually open the windows and stick your head out – we need to educate customers that this simply isn’t safe practice and we need to be certain that customers know exactly how to manage the new type of train we are going to be introducing.,”

New type of train? Has she realised that passengers do travel on TOCs other than Hull Trains and have used -and are still using-125 slam door stock on the ECML (including to Hull) and elsewhere?!

What's great is that the photo in the article shows a MK4 DVT and not even a HST!
 

yorksrob

Veteran Member
Joined
6 Aug 2009
Messages
39,132
Location
Yorks
It's certainly excellent news that the HST's on its way. With regard to the door issue, HT's staff will probably need some training, but as far as passengers are concerned, it should be borne in mind that the route in question is already served by HST's.
 

dk1

Veteran Member
Joined
2 Oct 2009
Messages
16,092
Location
East Anglia
Accepting airline passengers is a useful marketing ploy by LNER - the passengers get to try the competition, so of course may travel byrail next time, and the company gets its name all over the media.
Exactly what I was saying. Good move by LNER & something Virgin West Coast has done several times before.
 

30907

Veteran Member
Joined
30 Sep 2012
Messages
18,145
Location
Airedale
I think the point is that whosever train fails, be it HT, GC or LNER the best outcome for the rail passenger is for the industry to work together and offer a solution. The operator that accepts others tickets gets paid a substantial sum for doing so. Presumably they are not getting any revenue for carrying the air passengers today. Incidentally, if I bought a walk up fare today for potentially £200+ and found myself sat next to somebody travelling for free that wasn't even a rail passenger to begin with I would feel rather annoyed!
The 1848 HT was cancelled on Tuesday night. LNER were accepting on the 1906 Newark and 1933 Leeds, both trains presumably not being as busy as the 1903/1930.
 

TUC

Established Member
Joined
11 Nov 2010
Messages
3,633
I imagine (but guess) this HST door issue has some health and safety reasoning behind it. The risk assessment for introducing a potentially unsafe practice would be greater than if it is already in service with that operator.
Maybe, but First Group have a history of being hyper over-reactive to health and safety issues.
 

NoOnesFool

Member
Joined
26 Aug 2018
Messages
602

43096

On Moderation
Joined
23 Nov 2015
Messages
15,360
While a friend's university student son was overcarried because he'd never previously encountered slam doors on a train, and I routinely observe people struggling to work them out whenever I travel on one. Not a question of snowflakes or despairing of people, just that many people lack familiarity and slam door trains are now a minority of trains. No different to my confusion at the SVR a couple of years ago when I first used ex GWR stock.
If they just read the instructions it’s much easier. Normals......
 

cactustwirly

Established Member
Joined
10 Apr 2013
Messages
7,470
Location
UK
If they just read the instructions it’s much easier. Normals......

Tbh it took me a few attempts to open HST doors when I first traveled on them (mainly because I didn't pull the handle far enough)
 

Killingworth

Established Member
Joined
30 May 2018
Messages
4,915
Location
Sheffield
Tbh it took me a few attempts to open HST doors when I first traveled on them (mainly because I didn't pull the handle far enough)

Do they not have leather straps and studs to secure them? I used to find that really difficult back in the day, possibly travelling from Scarborough to Hull hauled by a D49 Hunt Class:)
 

rjchapma

Member
Joined
8 Dec 2017
Messages
58
Hull Trains being given a hard time again on twitter as it looks like another unit is out of action. Its not the 4 car unit 109? as announcements are still showing this onin service. It seems that crofton are really struggling wirh their maintenance.
 

_toommm_

Established Member
Joined
8 Jul 2017
Messages
5,862
Location
Yorkshire
Looks like a unit struck an object between Hull and Doncaster and it was taken out of service at Donny. How many units is that now (admittedly this isn't in their control of course)
 

SC43090

Member
Joined
7 Sep 2018
Messages
197
On Friday 28th December 2018....

The following services was cancelled

1A95 1512 Hull KX

1H06 1848 KX Beverley

Saturday 29th December 20-18

1A96 1834 Hull KX terminated at Doncaster due obstruction on the line

SC 43090
 

rjchapma

Member
Joined
8 Dec 2017
Messages
58
On Friday 28th December 2018....

The following services was cancelled

1A95 1512 Hull KX

1H06 1848 KX Beverley

Saturday 29th December 20-18

1A96 1834 Hull KX terminated at Doncaster due obstruction on the line

SC 43090

Along with

Sat 29th

1A91 05.57 Beverley - KGX
1H02 09.48 KGX - Hull
1A94 13.31 Hull - KGX
1H06 17.48 KGX - Beverley

These cancellations have no specific reason given (more trains than usual needing repair/PG)

and Sunday 30th

1H02 10.48 KGX - Hull

The 1H02 on Sunday is as a result of 1A96 on Saturday.
 

STEVIEBOY1

Established Member
Joined
31 Jul 2010
Messages
4,001
I happened to be walking through KGX Yesterday and saw the 0948 was cancelled, they were telling passengers to take the 1015 to Peterborough and change there for connections, I wondered if the Hull Train was starting from there perhaps?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top