There are two very distinct issues at play here.
1. CCTV footage shows there were spare seats and JC mislead the public by saying the train was "jam/ram packed"
2. Virgin released the CCTV
The two things are totally separate issues - if VT had not released the CCTV footage does not magically mean JC sat on the floor the whole trip or was not able to find a seat and that he walked passed empty seats to make his little film. That still happened, the fact the CCTV footage was released to the public is not relevant (but the catalyst) to the topic of JC.
What I mean by catalyst, is that it meant he was called out on his claim. The legalities of how they did it does not change that fact.
Edited for clarity
1. CCTV footage shows there were spare seats and JC mislead the public by saying the train was "jam/ram packed"
2. Virgin released the CCTV
The two things are totally separate issues - if VT had not released the CCTV footage does not magically mean JC sat on the floor the whole trip or was not able to find a seat and that he walked passed empty seats to make his little film. That still happened, the fact the CCTV footage was released to the public is not relevant (but the catalyst) to the topic of JC.
What I mean by catalyst, is that it meant he was called out on his claim. The legalities of how they did it does not change that fact.
Edited for clarity
Last edited: