• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Jubilee Cities Announced

Status
Not open for further replies.

Clip

Established Member
Joined
28 Jun 2010
Messages
10,822
Why is Chelmsford "understandable" ?

To someone who visits the place fairly regularly, I have to say the place is basically a dump ! It has a pokey 2 platform station, and doesn't have a proper bus station or a proper football team.

I'm not sure of all the towns competing, but of the ones already mentioned in this thread, I would say Middlesborough more suitable to become cities than Chelmsford !

I love the Irony of your post.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Xenophon PCDGS

Veteran Member
Joined
17 Apr 2011
Messages
34,058
Location
A typical commuter-belt part of north-west England
Oh dear. Perth I understand and Chelmsford yeah, but St Asaph...what the heck? Why? Sure it's religious but we have Reading and Middlesborough which are much better contenders!

There was to be one new city each from Scotland, Wales and England. Surely you cannot expect Reading or Midddlesbrough to contest St Asaph for the Welsh city winner..:D:D
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
It had to be Northern Irish AFAIK, as the city statues went to the other three UK countries.

Did Armagh receive an upgraded status in some manner today? Incidentally, did you mean to say "statutes" rather than statues ?
 
Last edited:

Ivo

Established Member
Joined
8 Jan 2010
Messages
7,307
Location
Bath (or Southend)

But it only became a City ten years earlier! Why should it gain a Lord Mayor so soon after its elevation when many cities designated as such since Time Immemorial are still waiting?

There was to be one new city each from Scotland, Wales and England.

There wasn't supposed to be - it was expected to have been only one from the entire Union.

Did Armagh receive an upgraded status in some manner today?

See the previous page. Armagh has been awarded the title of the seat of a Lord Mayoralship - a designation only official cities can apply for.
 

Eagle

Established Member
Joined
20 Feb 2011
Messages
7,106
Location
Leamingrad / Blanfrancisco
Wow. I haven't seen this much arguing over what is to all intents and purposes a change of terminology since... well, since the equal marriage thread :lol:
 

Xenophon PCDGS

Veteran Member
Joined
17 Apr 2011
Messages
34,058
Location
A typical commuter-belt part of north-west England
There wasn't supposed to be - it was expected to have been only one from the entire Union.

Who was it who made the decision to make an award of a city status this time to Scotland, Wales and England. Sorry, but I have been out of touch somewhat today.

Incidentally, I am old enough to have travelled on the Vale of Clwyd railway to St Asaph railway station before it was closed in 1964.
 

MidnightFlyer

Veteran Member
Joined
16 May 2010
Messages
12,856
I don't know, but Clegg said something about representing every country's equal role in the Union, ergo they all get something.
 

Ivo

Established Member
Joined
8 Jan 2010
Messages
7,307
Location
Bath (or Southend)
Who was it who made the decision to make an award of a city status this time to Scotland, Wales and England. Sorry, but I have been out of touch somewhat today.

It would have been the Queen on the advice of Nick Clegg as Lord President of the Privy Council. The reigning monarch is unlikely to disagree, although it should be noted that the modern format (i.e. competitions) have only been in use since the 1992 elevation of Sunderland.

P.S.: Not to worry; we all have days like that...
 

Eagle

Established Member
Joined
20 Feb 2011
Messages
7,106
Location
Leamingrad / Blanfrancisco
I don't know, but Clegg said something about representing every country's equal role in the Union, ergo they all get something.

Let's see...

England: 51 cities, population 51.45 million, average one city per 1,009,000 population.

Scotland: seven cities, population 5.22 million, average one city per 746,000 population.

Wales: six cities, population 3.01 million, average one city per 502,000 population.

Northern Ireland: five cities, population 1.80 million, average one city per 360,000 population.

Overall: 69 cities, population 62.26 million, average one city per 902,000 population.

So smaller countries have disproportionate numbers of cities...
 

Ivo

Established Member
Joined
8 Jan 2010
Messages
7,307
Location
Bath (or Southend)
Not so long ago, Southend had a City Bid section on both the council website and the Visit Southend website.

Now?

Sunny Southend isn't so Sunny right now - in fact, it's somewhat Stormy (note the lightning) :lol:
 

Attachments

  • SS Fails Again!.jpg
    SS Fails Again!.jpg
    39.6 KB · Views: 19

Clip

Established Member
Joined
28 Jun 2010
Messages
10,822
I have been to Middlesborough and do know what it's like - and prefer it to Chelmsford

Aye a dump with no proper football team.

Just because you prefer one over the other doesnt mean they are not both terrible places to qualify as Cities.

It was bad enough when they made Sunderland one.
 

Swr28

Member
Joined
30 Aug 2011
Messages
80
Location
The Cambrian since 1982
I think St Asaph was chosen due historical links to the Welsh language the place where the bible was translated into Wels this hopefully give some connection to future generations of Welsh speakers.
 

Badger

Member
Joined
17 Oct 2011
Messages
617
Location
Wolverhampton
Ah, that's a bit more special then.

Out of curiosity, when does a church become a cathedral?

Wolverhampton has no cathedral but it does have a very big, important church-of-historical-significance. :p
 

tbtc

Veteran Member
Joined
16 Dec 2008
Messages
17,884
Location
Reston City Centre
I can't seem to find population figures for Raith :P

It's smaller than Albion (where the Rovers play), but bigger than Queen (of the South)

I don't know, but Clegg said something about representing every country's equal role in the Union, ergo they all get something.

I think Yorkshire ought to get a new city - its as big and important as Wales :lol:
 

bnm

Established Member
Joined
12 Oct 2009
Messages
4,992
I've just read the entire thread and come to the conclusion:

I couldn't care less whether Anytown, UK becomes a city. Particularly with all the subjectivity from thread contributors directed at certain places. It's such irrational, illogical thinking to dislike a particular place.

Haters gonna hate indeed.

:roll::roll::roll:
 

Xenophon PCDGS

Veteran Member
Joined
17 Apr 2011
Messages
34,058
Location
A typical commuter-belt part of north-west England
Why does the link to professional or semi-professional football clubs have any relevance to the decision to award city status to settlements ?
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
I can't seem to find population figures for Raith :P

Raith is not a settlement as such. Refer to Kirkcaldy, which had a population of 46,912 in the 2001 census.
 

Ivo

Established Member
Joined
8 Jan 2010
Messages
7,307
Location
Bath (or Southend)
Why does the link to professional or semi-professional football clubs have any relevance to the decision to award city status to settlements ?

Because it is a means of culture that might make some people come visit for a means that actually has nothing to do with the settlement itself as such, even though said cluture does bring a limited degree of benefit to the location but not any improved status.

In short: It doesn't.

But you knew that already ;) We do at least have one less anomaly in the English league system now though.
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
I've just found an interesting response from the leader of MK council:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-17373780

"This won't change anything - we already regard ourselves as a city.

"And there's a saying that if it looks like a duck and sounds like a duck it probably is a duck."
 
Last edited:

tbtc

Veteran Member
Joined
16 Dec 2008
Messages
17,884
Location
Reston City Centre
How about restricting city status to a top twenty/ fifty settlements? That way it would have to mean something.

As things are going, gaining city status is going to be a box ticking exercise rather than joining the elite. You know the way that climbing Mount Kilimanjaro used to be a significant achievement, then it became the benchmark for thousands of people doing charity fundraisers and lost the "cache" that it had? Or getting straight "A"s at GCSE/ A Level was quite something, but then became "the norm" so that they had to increase "A*" etc.

As a suggestion:

* - Places with a population of over 250,000
* - Places with three/four digit telephone codes (e.g. 020 for London, 029 for Cardiff 0141 for Glasgow, 0113 for Leeds)
* - Places with single letter post codes (e.g. B for Birmingham, S for Sheffield)
Population of over

Forget cathedrals (so few people attend regular church services), forget things like Mayors, make being a city something meaningful or forget about it
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top