• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Last BR train, headboard removed "for safety reasons" ! ? !

Status
Not open for further replies.

Geezertronic

Established Member
Joined
14 Apr 2009
Messages
4,113
Location
Birmingham
Simple.
Because it's in their long term interest to do so.

That's rather an arrogant statement to make. Trains will be around whether enthusiasts like them or not. Enthusiasts will be interested in trains regardless otherwise the NRM, Didcot, SVR or other places would not have a market.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Justin Smith

Established Member
Joined
14 Nov 2009
Messages
1,245
Location
Sheffield
That's rather an arrogant statement to make. Trains will be around whether enthusiasts like them or not. Enthusiasts will be interested in trains regardless otherwise the NRM, Didcot, SVR or other places would not have a market.

It isn't arrogant at all, in fact I can't see how you come up with that word ? ! ?

Three words, Settle to Carlisle.
It was enthusiasts and those with an affection for rail which, arguably, saved the Settle to Carlisle.
I must say I find is odd that anyone could disagree with the idea that more rail enthusiasts is a positive thing for railways, and as such it`s in the rail industries own interest to encourage it.
 

Geezertronic

Established Member
Joined
14 Apr 2009
Messages
4,113
Location
Birmingham
It isn't arrogant at all, in fact I can't see how you come up with that word ? ! ?

Three words, Settle to Carlisle.
It was enthusiasts and those with an affection for rail which, arguably, saved the Settle to Carlisle.
I must say I find is odd that anyone could disagree with the idea that more rail enthusiasts is a positive thing for railways, and as such it's in the rail industries own interest to encourage it.

I find it arrogant that you expect this of the rail industry. I too have been to places such as the SVR and Telford and I certainly enjoyed myself. But I would not expect that kind of effort from the TOCs or FOCs.
 

Justin Smith

Established Member
Joined
14 Nov 2009
Messages
1,245
Location
Sheffield
I find it arrogant that you expect this of the rail industry. I too have been to places such as the SVR and Telford and I certainly enjoyed myself. But I would not expect that kind of effort from the TOCs or FOCs.

I think there's a breakdown in communication here, I don't expect it at all. Quite the opposite in fact. I'm saying there's no way it'd happen these days, and I think it's incredibly sad. BUT, I can't think of any good reason why it shouldn't happen.
 
Last edited:

Greenback

Emeritus Moderator
Joined
9 Aug 2009
Messages
15,268
Location
Llanelli
Simple.
Because it's in their long term interest to do so.

--- old post above --- --- new post below ---

I don't hate H&S, much of it is useful. However, most of the bits that are useful are bleedin' obvious anyway ! As far as I'm aware it used to be based on the concept of "reasonable", e.g. is it reasonable to expect an installer to fit an aerial on his own ? Answer : Yes it's reasonable.
QED

English law relies heavily on the term reasonable. The interpretation of this word in various statutes has caused endless legal argument and has probably mostly benefitted the bank accounts of lawyers!

In answer to the question you posed, is the answer definitely yes? What about factors such as the condition of the roof itself, the weather etc? These are the sorts of things that surely must be looked at as a basic risk asessment?
 

Justin Smith

Established Member
Joined
14 Nov 2009
Messages
1,245
Location
Sheffield
English law relies heavily on the term reasonable. The interpretation of this word in various statutes has caused endless legal argument and has probably mostly benefitted the bank accounts of lawyers!

In answer to the question you posed, is the answer definitely yes? What about factors such as the condition of the roof itself, the weather etc? These are the sorts of things that surely must be looked at as a basic risk asessment?

I'd agree with that, but one installer is just as capable of doing that as two !
It was part of the employment contract that the installers were required to do their own risk assessments and they had to sign to say they were capable of doing that.
I never criticised any of my installers for refusing to do a job on safety grounds. In fact it was more usually the opposite, me telling them they actually shouldn't have done it !
 

9K43

Member
Joined
1 May 2010
Messages
558
THe Green Express that ran from Leeds to Dawlish last Satuday and back again had a headboard on there and back.
We had a class 47 t and T and 13 coaches on for a good day out, and the 47's fair rattled the train along.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top