• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

LNER Livery

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Domh245

Established Member
Joined
6 Apr 2013
Messages
8,426
Location
nowhere
That livery isn't terrible. Widen the stripe at the top of the headlights so that it has more of a flow, and shrink (or better completely remove) the Azuma branding and itd be perfectly fine
 

muddythefish

On Moderation
Joined
13 May 2014
Messages
1,576
It was for the 10:30 departure and has just arrived at Peterborough with the same minimal branding changes as seen in post #145. Not sure what sort of launch there was beforehand though.

This was 91105 on that 10:30 departure.
Dghms0wXcAAKM2C.jpg

https://twitter.com/Modern_Railways/status/1011171052989353984


Appalling.

is it too much to ask for coaches in teak-effect brown like the grand wooden bodied vehicles of the 1930s, with a blue locomotive at the head ?

Or maybe green and cream like the LNER "tourist" stock ?

So much more tasteful the the garish and vulgar above.
 

Craigster90

Member
Joined
24 Jun 2018
Messages
16
Anyone know if Class 91 91109 still carries ‘Sir Bobby Robson’ nameplate and if it’s currently in traffic? Havn’t seen it in a while
 

FQTV

Member
Joined
27 Apr 2012
Messages
1,067
Anyone know if Class 91 91109 still carries ‘Sir Bobby Robson’ nameplate and if it’s currently in traffic? Havn’t seen it in a while

Yes, it does carry the nameplates and yes, it’s very much still in traffic.
 

59CosG95

Established Member
Joined
18 Aug 2013
Messages
6,498
Location
Between Peterborough & Bedlington
Appalling.

is it too much to ask for coaches in teak-effect brown like the grand wooden bodied vehicles of the 1930s, with a blue locomotive at the head ?

Or maybe green and cream like the LNER "tourist" stock ?

So much more tasteful the the garish and vulgar above.
There's little point in repainting stock at vast expense that is due to be withdrawn soon anyway; the reasons why have been discussed at length further upthread.
 

xc170

Member
Joined
9 Feb 2008
Messages
815
Appalling.

is it too much to ask for coaches in teak-effect brown like the grand wooden bodied vehicles of the 1930s, with a blue locomotive at the head ?

Or maybe green and cream like the LNER "tourist" stock ?

So much more tasteful the the garish and vulgar above.

I'm not sure 50+ year old liveries would work on modern stock...
 

nottsnurse

Member
Joined
1 May 2014
Messages
275
is it too much to ask for coaches in teak-effect brown like the grand wooden bodied vehicles of the 1930s, with a blue locomotive at the head ?

Because what better way to run a modern railway than to pretend it's the 1930s...

The East Coast Mainline is not a heritage railway.
 

transmanche

Established Member
Joined
27 Feb 2011
Messages
6,018
is it too much to ask for coaches in teak-effect brown like the grand wooden bodied vehicles of the 1930s, with a blue locomotive at the head ?
Yes, it is.

Do you think that if the original LNER had continued in existence, it would still be using teak-effect brown and blue?
 

trash80

Established Member
Joined
18 Aug 2015
Messages
1,204
Location
Birches Green
Plus the LU 4-TC set had teak effect vinyls on it for awhile and i don't think it looked that great
 

Rick1984

Member
Joined
23 Aug 2012
Messages
1,038
The livery should be built around the train. Like the IC125, IC225, APT and even original Pendilino. Not just wack a band on and say "job done".
Especially as the livery will be expected to last for many years.
 

Rail Blues

Member
Joined
2 Aug 2016
Messages
608
Appalling.

is it too much to ask for coaches in teak-effect brown like the grand wooden bodied vehicles of the 1930s, with a blue locomotive at the head ?


Or maybe green and cream like the LNER "tourist" stock ?

So much more tasteful the the garish and vulgar above.

It really wouldn't be more tasteful. Teak bodied 80x stock? It would look horrendous and about as classy and authentic as those fake books that people use to put video cassettes in during the 1980s.
 

mallard

Established Member
Joined
12 Apr 2009
Messages
1,304
"Teak" is obviously taking it a bit far, but some form of blue would certainly be more appropriate (and more attractive IMHO) for the route. If GWR can paint their trains with a colour scheme based on the locomotive green of their namesake (which, ironically, makes them look more like the trains of their main rival, the Southern Railway), surely it can't be beyond the wit of man to come up with an attractive use of something approaching "garter blue" for the ECML.
 

CosherB

Established Member
Joined
23 Feb 2007
Messages
3,041
Location
Northwich
I wonder what livery the 91 sets will get when / if they stay with LNER (as in the 6 or so planned to stay).

On that note, what will they be branded as? I’m guessing they’ll then named like the Nova series of trains.
If they stay ... they won't be re-branded in any, shape or form other than the new LNER logos .... and no they won't. Simples.
 

transmanche

Established Member
Joined
27 Feb 2011
Messages
6,018
"Teak" is obviously taking it a bit far, but some form of blue would certainly be more appropriate (and more attractive IMHO) for the route.
Why? Today's LNER is not a heritage railway. And even if the original LNER was still in operation, it's really unlikely they'd still be using the same colour scheme(s) that they used for 25 years almost a century ago.

What next...?

1072a844a7dab13f38b1057984bbb203.jpg

Source
 

mallard

Established Member
Joined
12 Apr 2009
Messages
1,304
And even if the original LNER was still in operation, it's really unlikely they'd still be using the same colour scheme(s) that they used for 25 years almost a century ago.

I'm not suggesting they would. I am suggesting that they wouldn't be using a very similar colour scheme to their main competitor for the sake of cheapness though... (Even GWR isn't doing that; the modern GWR livery is very different from the SWR livery, despite having the same parent company, and they don't really compete with the modern "Southern".)
 

tbtc

Veteran Member
Joined
16 Dec 2008
Messages
17,882
Location
Reston City Centre
Because what better way to run a modern railway than to pretend it's the 1930s...

The East Coast Mainline is not a heritage railway.

Agreed - the obsession with the past belongs to the North Yorkshire Moors or whatever.

"Teak" is obviously taking it a bit far, but some form of blue would certainly be more appropriate (and more attractive IMHO) for the route. If GWR can paint their trains with a colour scheme based on the locomotive green of their namesake (which, ironically, makes them look more like the trains of their main rival, the Southern Railway), surely it can't be beyond the wit of man to come up with an attractive use of something approaching "garter blue" for the ECML

Just because you like that colour of blue?

As has been pointed out on the thread, LNER used light blue and dark blue and light green and dark green and maroon and teak and silver and black... (yet we complain about modern companies changing liveries every five/ten years...).

https://d240vprofozpi.cloudfront.net/locos/A/a4_aceposter.png

Why do we have to go back to "garter" blue, when LNER had lots of different colour schemes? I can understand nostalgia, but the very specific nostalgia for one particular period (rather than all of the other liveries used etc) is a bit much.
 

DarloRich

Veteran Member
Joined
12 Oct 2010
Messages
29,310
Location
Fenny Stratford
"Teak" is obviously taking it a bit far, but some form of blue would certainly be more appropriate (and more attractive IMHO) for the route. If GWR can paint their trains with a colour scheme based on the locomotive green of their namesake (which, ironically, makes them look more like the trains of their main rival, the Southern Railway), surely it can't be beyond the wit of man to come up with an attractive use of something approaching "garter blue" for the ECML.

There have been complaints about the finances of the franchise and whether, or not, this change is a "bail out". - the new operation are not going to waste money on a full repaint. it simply inst needed nor would it look good in the papers.

I get the desire for a nice uniform fleet but it isnt a priority when the current colours will serve with a few cheap and minor tweaks.
 

mallard

Established Member
Joined
12 Apr 2009
Messages
1,304
Just because you like that colour of blue?

As has been pointed out on the thread, LNER used light blue and dark blue and light green and dark green and maroon and teak and silver and black... (yet we complain about modern companies changing liveries every five/ten years...).

Any blue is fine by me (as long as it doesn't look too "Thameslink"), as is green... Note that of the actual LNER (and not BR) liveries shown in that image, you have silver, apple green, garter blue and wartime black (with slight BR modificiation). Red, however, is only being used because it's Virgin's colour and is therefore less effort to replace completely. It's not historically associatied with the ECML to any great extent (although there is a bit of a connection with the LNER's ex-GCR division) and dosn't do much to differentiate it from other routes. People will be confusing it with Virgin for quite a long time, I suspect.

Maybe if Virgin lose the WCML and it goes to an operator that doesn't use red...
 

transmanche

Established Member
Joined
27 Feb 2011
Messages
6,018
(Even GWR isn't doing that; the modern GWR livery is very different from the SWR livery, despite having the same parent company, and they don't really compete with the modern "Southern".)
I don't see your point. The modern GWR is owned by First, the modern SWR is owned by First and MTR. Each TOC decides their own branding independently. The colour palette they choose ties in with whatever brand image they wish to create. GWR have gone for a 'classic' look, SWR have gone with a 'modern' or contemporary look. They will have their own reasons for that. Another of First's TOCs (TPE) have gone for a very 'dynamic' or 'futuristic' look, which ties in with the image their advertising tries to create: "Our part of the world is moving pretty fast."

To today's passengers, red is colour of the trains to/from London on the East Coast mainline. Very few of them will know or care about apple green or garter blue. LNER have decided (for the time being) that they're going to stick with red. Who knows what might happen in the future.

Things. Change.
 
Joined
17 Jul 2017
Messages
61
Why? Today's LNER is not a heritage railway. And even if the original LNER was still in operation, it's really unlikely they'd still be using the same colour scheme(s) that they used for 25 years almost a century ago.


Co-op have ditched the 90s look and brought back the 60s logo, typeface, etc, so why not?
It's just marketing.
 

mallard

Established Member
Joined
12 Apr 2009
Messages
1,304
I don't see your point. The modern GWR is owned by First, the modern SWR is owned by First and MTR. Each TOC decides their own branding independently.

I'm pretty sure that's not true. TOCs do try to make their liveries and schemes distinct from others to avoid confusion and enhance brand recogition. There's a reason why First (finally!) dropped their dire corporate liveries (except on HT for some reason); it would be an absolute nightmare at places like Exeter and Reading if they were still using them.

To today's passengers, red is colour of the trains to/from London on the East Coast mainline.

And 3 years ago it was grey/silver and before that dark blue... Keeping the red is done entirely to keep the rebrand "cheap" (as was the use of Grey/Silver by DOR). It's a shame that the colour will likely be forced onto the next operator.
 

transmanche

Established Member
Joined
27 Feb 2011
Messages
6,018
Co-op have ditched the 90s look and brought back the 60s logo, typeface, etc, so why not?
Actually, they took the 1960s logo and subtly changed it - and added a new colour palette and a new typeface.

And they did that for a very specific reason. They decided that going back to their roots and harking back to a 'simpler' time would help them get over the problems of the past few years. By basing it on the old logo, but giving it a contemporary look means the logo may look familiar but everything else about the shop will look bang-up-to-date.

It's just marketing.
You're absolutely right.
 

transmanche

Established Member
Joined
27 Feb 2011
Messages
6,018
Each TOC decides their own branding independently. The colour palette they choose ties in with whatever brand image they wish to create. GWR have gone for a 'classic' look, SWR have gone with a 'modern' or contemporary look. They will have their own reasons for that. Another of First's TOCs (TPE) have gone for a very 'dynamic' or 'futuristic' look, which ties in with the image their advertising tries to create: "Our part of the world is moving pretty fast."

I'm pretty sure that's not true. TOCs do try to make their liveries and schemes distinct from others to avoid confusion and enhance brand recogition.
You say you disagree with me - and continue by agreeing with me. :D
 

mpthomson

Member
Joined
18 Feb 2016
Messages
971
Appalling.

is it too much to ask for coaches in teak-effect brown like the grand wooden bodied vehicles of the 1930s, with a blue locomotive at the head ?

Or maybe green and cream like the LNER "tourist" stock ?

So much more tasteful the the garish and vulgar above.

Because it's a modernish working railway not a heritage line for trainspotters. Things have moved on a touch since 1948.....
 

transmanche

Established Member
Joined
27 Feb 2011
Messages
6,018
Keeping the red is done entirely to keep the rebrand "cheap"
I'm sure cost was one of the considerations in choosing to stick with a red-based colour palette. But it shows that they thought the positives outweighed any negatives: i.e. that they didn't consider the red of Virgin so toxic that they needed to make a very visual break from it and that it was a 'good thing' to 'ride on the coat-tails' of the Virgin brand by making the most of the goodwill associated with it.

Remember, the average passenger isn't the cynical old grump that we are on this forum. There are lots of people out there who view the Virgin brand in a positive light. If there are so many 'normals' who still think Virgin operate CrossCountry, then they may have thought that it's not a bad thing if they think Virgin are still running East Coast...

(as was the use of Grey/Silver by DOR)
I disagree. If you're re-vinyling a loco or a coach, going for silver/grey really isn't going to save a packet over any other colour combination.[/QUOTE]

It's a shame that the colour will likely be forced onto the next operator.
Again, no reason that it should. Just because they may be required to use the LNER name doesn't mean they will continue to use the same colour palette forever. The new operator may decide that the time is right for a visual break from the previous operators and change the colour of everything - and factor that cost that into their bid.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top