• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

LNR new WCML timetable, May 2019 (in open data feeds)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

sufian123

Member
Joined
1 May 2017
Messages
1,160
Location
Birmingham
List of services along the Trent Valley with scheduled for 8 coaches from May

Sunday services from Crewe
0952
1001
1216
1316
1416
1516
1616
1716
1816
1933
Sunday services from Euston
0855
1053
1243
1343
1443
1543
1646
1743
1843
1947
Saturday services from Crewe
0538
0624
0833
0933
1033
1133
1233
1333
1433
1533
1633
1733
2038
Saturday services from Euston
0746
0846
0946
1046
1146
1246
1346
1446
1546
1646
1746
1846
Monday – Friday services from Euston
0846
0946
1046
1146
1246
1646
1746
1846
Monday – Friday services from Crewe
0547
0714
1133
1233
1332
1433
1533
1935
2153

The most obvious ‘mistake’ is the 1546 from London, always packed, I have queried it.

Hi there isn’t 1001 from Crewe on Sunday?
 

RealTrains07

Established Member
Joined
28 Feb 2019
Messages
1,760
Still not happy with the train situation at stone. Hopefully it can be quickly improved considering all other stations in the area have at least 2 trains an hour or more
 

Idon'tKnow

Member
Joined
20 Aug 2016
Messages
119
Location
Staffordshire
I'm actually shocked! 0854 and 1010 in the new timetable from lichfield to London are busy at the moment but will still be 4 carriages! 1546 is rammed and still 4, 1446 is well loaded (especially Friday) and still 4. This is most disappointing.
 

sufian123

Member
Joined
1 May 2017
Messages
1,160
Location
Birmingham
I'm actually shocked! 0854 and 1010 in the new timetable from lichfield to London are busy at the moment but will still be 4 carriages! 1546 is rammed and still 4, 1446 is well loaded (especially Friday) and still 4. This is most disappointing.

It’s not their fault. 350/4s was meant to be coming in April. Delayed till December now due to testing of tpe new trains. They are doing the best they can.
 

Idon'tKnow

Member
Joined
20 Aug 2016
Messages
119
Location
Staffordshire
Why are they lengthening trains that aren't too busy? Eg. The 0846 from Euston. They should give busier services 8 carriages, not quieter ones.
 

Idon'tKnow

Member
Joined
20 Aug 2016
Messages
119
Location
Staffordshire
Hmm, but Trent Valley services terminating at Euston look like they turn around to form a Tring stopper or a Crewe via Northampton, Birmingham and Stoke. :|
 

sufian123

Member
Joined
1 May 2017
Messages
1,160
Location
Birmingham
Hmm, but Trent Valley services terminating at Euston look like they turn around to form a Tring stopper or a Crewe via Northampton, Birmingham and Stoke. :|

Crewe via Northampton will spilt at new st. One portion for Crewe the other for rugeley. They are being diagrammed as 8 cars.
 

Idon'tKnow

Member
Joined
20 Aug 2016
Messages
119
Location
Staffordshire
Wow the timetable seems very vulnerable in the sense that a problem in one place could cause chaos in another due to how interlinked all the services are.
 

BluePenguin

On Moderation
Joined
26 Sep 2016
Messages
1,605
Location
Kent
If only there was enough for all services to be 12 carriages long. Making more efficient use of what is available by continuing services across Birmingham will surely help to some extent.
 

sd0733

Established Member
Joined
7 Nov 2012
Messages
3,604
I'm actually shocked! 0854 and 1010 in the new timetable from lichfield to London are busy at the moment but will still be 4 carriages! 1546 is rammed and still 4, 1446 is well loaded (especially Friday) and still 4. This is most disappointing.
Totally agree, i appreciate that there is a shortfall of 10 units but the current busy trains in the week are almost all the same size as before and quicker which could lead to even worse overcrowding at the Crewe end, granted some Stoke passengers will be lost/go via Brum
Some of these workings almost look like its a case of putting an 8 car on a train just to say there are x amount of seats/ x amount of 8 cars per day/week.
 

sd0733

Established Member
Joined
7 Nov 2012
Messages
3,604
Still not happy with the train situation at stone. Hopefully it can be quickly improved considering all other stations in the area have at least 2 trains an hour or more
Im afraid the likelihood of Stone recieving more trains in the immediate future i almost zero. Until such a time as HS2 becomes operational there are almost certainly no paths to run to anywhere meaningful.
 

Idon'tKnow

Member
Joined
20 Aug 2016
Messages
119
Location
Staffordshire
Totally agree, i appreciate that there is a shortfall of 10 units but the current busy trains in the week are almost all the same size as before and quicker which could lead to even worse overcrowding at the Crewe end, granted some Stoke passengers will be lost/go via Brum
Some of these workings almost look like its a case of putting an 8 car on a train just to say there are x amount of seats/ x amount of 8 cars per day/week.


Totally agree!!!! There's little point in extending quiet services to 8 carriages if they can't even manage to extend our busiest ones!
 

The Planner

Veteran Member
Joined
15 Apr 2008
Messages
15,963
If only there was enough for all services to be 12 carriages long. Making more efficient use of what is available by continuing services across Birmingham will surely help to some extent.
Wouldn't make any difference, maximum length of most platforms across the West Mids is 8 car, and still some that cannot do that.
 

DavidGrain

Established Member
Joined
29 Dec 2017
Messages
1,236
I did once see a 12 car SilverLink train come into New Street but once past Rugby, I expect it just stopped at Coventry and Birmingham International. This was many years ago and I thought how ridiculous was the brand new 4 car Voyager in comparison just leaving for the north east from a nearby platform.
 

RealTrains07

Established Member
Joined
28 Feb 2019
Messages
1,760
Im afraid the likelihood of Stone recieving more trains in the immediate future i almost zero. Until such a time as HS2 becomes operational there are almost certainly no paths to run to anywhere meaningful.

Between Birmingham and crewe, WMR?!
 

RealTrains07

Established Member
Joined
28 Feb 2019
Messages
1,760
Is having services connected together a good idea, from what i heard, it sounds like the timetable is very concerning
 

VT 390

Established Member
Joined
7 Dec 2018
Messages
1,366
Between Birmingham and crewe, WMR?!

I thought that was what is happening, with the Euston to Crewe service running non stop from Stafford to Crewe to maintain 1tph between Stafford and Crewe via Stoke-on-Trent one of the Euston to Birmingham services will extend to Crewe via Stoke.
 

swt_passenger

Veteran Member
Joined
7 Apr 2010
Messages
31,437
Is having services connected together a good idea, from what i heard, it sounds like the timetable is very concerning
Of course it is. It’s been done before at New St, it’s why you now have services such as Virgin’s Euston to Scotland through trains.
 

The Planner

Veteran Member
Joined
15 Apr 2008
Messages
15,963
Scotland - Birmingham - Euston services have more robustness built into the timetable, unlike the new LNR timetable
That was just a happy coincidence of merging the two paths together, a dwell at Wolves like that wouldn't have been by design.
 

VT 390

Established Member
Joined
7 Dec 2018
Messages
1,366
That was just a happy coincidence of merging the two paths together, a dwell at Wolves like that wouldn't have been by design.
Is that not only in the southbound direction as northbound the dwell times at Wolverhampton are not that long at all.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top