I'm starting to think the company could make a proper improvement if they could find six spare buses. I agree I don't think at the current moment they need a half hourly service up to Winchburgh, unless they can speed up journey times.
I think if you had 2 spare buses you could operate an extra 73A to make complement the current 73 but instead of going to western inch it go direct to Armadale, while the other 4 buses could be used to operate complement 72, this it would operate Broxburn - Pumperston - Livingston - Whitburn, ( while the current 72 would direct down the fastlink)
That at least would make very good start with very limited resource's and might help resolve a number of issues passengers have highlighted. Then maybe it could be built upon later in 2025.
I’m hopeful we’ll see the 73 changed to be honest. After a rethink this is what I came up with. Nothing crazy, but steps in the right direction. My idea:
72: Curtailed to terminate at Broxburn at East Mains. 73 would serve Kirkliston. Controversial yes, but with the revised 73 you can offer a half hourly service between Blackburn and Livingston and between Broxburn and Livingston which is by far the ‘core’ section. This neatly fixes the long running problem too. Handful of 72’s could divert to serve J4 M8 Distribution Centre to part replace 73.
73: Changed to operate via Livingston Village, Seafield, Blackburn then Wester Inch and Bathgate. Remains hourly. The route would share that of the 72 between Blackburn and Livingston, but serve Livingston Village instead of Eliburn. Also extended to Kirkliston via current 72 route. J4 M8 Distribution Centre would no longer be served.
74: Extended to Blackridge via existing 73 route from Livingston to Bathgate, then via Lower Bathville and Armadale. Frequency increased to every 30 minutes.
X27/X28: Increased to every 15/30 minutes. Possible that a few extend to J4 M8 Distribution Centre where necessary?
Not much, but enough for the moment.