But that's my point. If being in the public sector made any difference, why is a TOC like Northern every bit as dismal in its abilities as when it was privatrly owned?
I’d argue that the public sector status of Northern makes a
huge difference to its abilities
It’s much worse now than under Serco/ Abellio/ Arriva!
At least those TOCs stuck to promises regarding services (e.g. Bentham line up from five a day to eight a day)/ introducing the 195s and 331s/ implementing Northern Connect etc - we knew that things would improve because the franchise requirements set these improvements out
The public sector Northern has ripped up various timetables, left some stations without a service for months (has Brigg had a train in the past year?), cancelled a load more services just before ten o’clock the night before (to avoid having to compensate people), cancelled plans for things like the fast Nottingham - Westgate - Bradford train, cut the Sheffield - Doncaster stopper from half hourly to every ninety minutes, continues to run some “cancelled” services ECS for staff training (even though passengers aren’t allowed to board)… they’ve been a disaster
However, because it’s a
public sector organisation wielding these cuts, the people who squealed if any Serco service was a couple of minutes late seem scared to question the Emperor’s clothes - I remember the days that teething problems with the introduction of the 319s saw a fresh thread opened on the Forum every time one failed, the worry about the cost of repainting a few station signs etc… but the OLR’s public sector status means that they get a free pass, people seem reluctant to question why they are doing worse than the private firms that went before them (If Nationalisation is the panacea that some have certainly claimed)