johncrossley
Established Member
When the inspector checks your Key card when using KeyGo, can they tell if there is a railcard associated with it? Nobody has asked to see my Network Railcard when using KeyGo.
Well phase one was originally supposed to come out start of this year but although the physical infistructure can be seen at some stations, its still not here but seems to be pretty close..? So I guess its just running behindI thought it was going to roll out in 2024? Was it announced to be delayed until March 2025
Isn't it the rather robust process of adding a railcard and then loaning it out to all your friends ?Does it matter considering the rather robust process in adding a railcard? Ultimately it comes down to if an inspector wants to see if the name on the Key card matches your photo ID.
The process of adding a railcard is robust given it has to match your name on the key card, and entering the railcard number, with a photo of the railcard if not a 16-17 Saver. The Key's primary anti-fraud measure is having the name printed on the card for which RPIs should be asking for should there be doubt. Ultimately, this is something for a different thread if needed to be discussed.Isn't it the rather robust process of adding a railcard and then loaning it out to all your friends ?
I was checked on board a GTR service last week and was not asked for my railcard. I've only had one previous check and I don't think I was asked that time either.When the inspector checks your Key card when using KeyGo, can they tell if there is a railcard associated with it? Nobody has asked to see my Network Railcard when using KeyGo.
Rail commuters could benefit from cheaper and simpler journeys as a smart ticketing system looks set to be rolled out to parts of Kent.
I was checked on board a GTR service last week and was not asked for my railcard. I've only had one previous check and I don't think I was asked that time either.
No photocard required with a Network Railcard.The process of adding a railcard is robust given it has to match your name on the key card, and entering the railcard number, with a photo of the railcard if not a 16-17 Saver. The Key's primary anti-fraud measure is having the name printed on the card for which RPIs should be asking for should there be doubt. Ultimately, this is something for a different thread if needed to be discussed.
Let's take a look at Brookmans Park which was the first station to get contactless only. Grant Shapps is the local MP and he was also SoS for Transport at the time, and contactless was launched to much fanfare.Is there any evidence that tickets will be cheaper ? I can’t see it
Both of these issues (which are highly marginal, in any event) would be resolved if the existing hotlist/blocked database were expanded to include details of the Railcards applied to particular cards. It's not rocket science and I'm struggling to understand why people keep suggesting that this is a huge blocker to the rollout of Railcards on contactless! All it takes is a bit of funding - but that money has not been forthcoming yet.
I agree, and there really does seem to be a lot of talking at cross-purposes here. Obviously there needs to be a level of security above "only check Railcard when adding entitlement", and the opposite end - "write entitlement to the card a la Oyster so it can be checked whenever and wherever" is impossible.Indeed.
Some time ago I proposed a system on here for barcode based e-ticketing.
It was rubbished on the grounds of insufficient security.
A year or two later and an e-ticketing system was implemented that was very close to what was proposed but was slightly less secure...![]()
Single fares will be cheaper if the TfL model is followed.Is there any evidence that tickets will be cheaper ? I can’t see it
No photocard required with a Network Railcard.
Let's take a look at Brookmans Park which was the first station to get contactless only. Grant Shapps is the local MP and he was also SoS for Transport at the time, and contactless was launched to much fanfare.
Brookmans Park to London must be the most popular flow.
Current traditional ticket prices to Kings Cross:
Anytime Day Return 17.40
Off Peak Day Return (no evening restrictions) 11.50
Super Off Peak Day Return (has evening peak restrictions) 11.20
Weekend Super Off Peak Day Return 8.20
Contactless fares:
Peak 8.70
Off Peak 5.60
So a passenger travelling out in the morning peak and back in the evening peak pays £17.40 the same as an Anytime traditional ticket
A passenger travelling out off peak and back off peak pays £11.20 the same as the current super off peak ticket
A passenger travelling out off peak but back in the evening peak pays £14.30 compared to £11.50 with a paper ticket. An increase of 24%
A weekend traveller pays £11.20 compared to £8.20 using a traditional ticket. An increase of 37%
A passenger travelling out in the morning peak but back outside of the evening peak pays £14.30 compared to £17.40 with a traditional ticket. A saving of 18%
It gets even worse for railcard holders especially at weekends where a traditional railcard discounted ticket is £5.40. Use contactless and you'll pay £11.20 - an increase of 107%
Even if railcards are enabled on contactless the cost of weekend travel still increases by a massive 37%. It appears to me that the DfT aided and abetted by The Treasury is planning to increase fares massively via the back door, especially for leisure and off peak travel. They will say that it's simplificanion, what people have been asking for and there is also a general thought that contactless is cheaper, but as demonstrated above in many cases it isn't.
I doubt traditional tickets will be withdrawn straight away, they will be left in place initially but how long will it be before they get removed? DfT/RDG will call it simplification, say there's no demand, fares structure stuck in the 1990s etc.....
The current fares structure is far from ideal but we need to be very, very careful what we wish for.
That's not going to happen, it's just not in scope for Project Oval.Clearly the back end processing needs to be more complex than the Underground's binary concept of peak and off peak.. maybe three fare levels and / or three caps
There's nothing wrong with contactless as a concept. It works extremely well, billions of journeys have been made using it, it's simple and quick. Passengers love it compared to paper tickets (just stand and look at an underground gateline - very few have used paper tickets for years and those that do generally only do so because contactless isn't yet available).Couldn’t agree more. Fare rises through the back door. I just find paper tickets with railcard applied so much easier, and understandable compared to contactless. Especially travelling across London.
Are there any plans to extend contactless to Basingstoke ? I think I heard farnborough mentioned somewhere….
Agree with your post, except that I think that people who use paper tickets would be more likely to but a Travelcard if they are going to London rather than buy normal return tickets, because they would be probably would be using the Underground (or a bus) when they get to London.No photocard required with a Network Railcard.
Let's take a look at Brookmans Park which was the first station to get contactless only. Grant Shapps is the local MP and he was also SoS for Transport at the time, and contactless was launched to much fanfare.
Brookmans Park to London must be the most popular flow.
Current traditional ticket prices to Kings Cross:
Anytime Day Return 17.40
Off Peak Day Return (no evening restrictions) 11.50
Super Off Peak Day Return (has evening peak restrictions) 11.20
Weekend Super Off Peak Day Return 8.20
Contactless fares:
Peak 8.70
Off Peak 5.60
So a passenger travelling out in the morning peak and back in the evening peak pays £17.40 the same as an Anytime traditional ticket
A passenger travelling out off peak and back off peak pays £11.20 the same as the current super off peak ticket
A passenger travelling out off peak but back in the evening peak pays £14.30 compared to £11.50 with a paper ticket. An increase of 24%
A weekend traveller pays £11.20 compared to £8.20 using a traditional ticket. An increase of 37%
A passenger travelling out in the morning peak but back outside of the evening peak pays £14.30 compared to £17.40 with a traditional ticket. A saving of 18%
It gets even worse for railcard holders especially at weekends where a traditional railcard discounted ticket is £5.40. Use contactless and you'll pay £11.20 - an increase of 107%
Even if railcards are enabled on contactless the cost of weekend travel still increases by a massive 37%. It appears to me that the DfT aided and abetted by The Treasury is planning to increase fares massively via the back door, especially for leisure and off peak travel. They will say that it's simplificanion, what people have been asking for and there is also a general thought that contactless is cheaper, but as demonstrated above in many cases it isn't.
I doubt traditional tickets will be withdrawn straight away, they will be left in place initially but how long will it be before they get removed? DfT/RDG will call it simplification, say there's no demand, fares structure stuck in the 1990s etc.....
The current fares structure is far from ideal but we need to be very, very careful what we wish for.
No they don't apply at weekendsDo peak restrictions apply at weekends with contactless? Is the 8.70 peak fare Monday - Friday only?
I agree that there will be some travelcard usage, and daily caps to consider. I'll do some further analysis when I get chance but I expect the essence of it to be similar, especially with respect to the super off peak tickets at weekends and railcards.Agree with your post, except that I think that people who use paper tickets would be more likely to but a Travelcard if they are going to London rather than buy normal return tickets, because they would be probably would be using the Underground (or a bus) when they get to London.
No, as the fare calculation with discounts all happens on the backend. I believe they could theoretically check the card against their own systems, which some staff can do by scanning the barcode on the reverse of the card with their dedicated app, but I've only had that happen once (and that didn't even work, so the person let me through the barrier anyway).When the inspector checks your Key card when using KeyGo, can they tell if there is a railcard associated with it? Nobody has asked to see my Network Railcard when using KeyGo.
Still available as CCST. It's only in-boundary Travelcard Seasons that are Oyster/ITSO only at present.TfL readers can read ITSO cards, so the season ticket holders are fine. Outboundary Travelcard seasons are only issued on ITSO I believe now.
I believe the Oyster readers at Elizabeth line west stations can read GwR touch smartcards with fixed origin and destination pointsStill available as CCST. It's only in-boundary Travelcard Seasons that are Oyster/ITSO only at present.
Standalone Oyster readers on the GTR network at stations such as Redhill work with KeyGo so I don't believe pre-loaded fixed points are a requirement.with fixed origin and destination points
Just to add - all of the LNR Smartcard readers have gone at Berkhamsted . Just empty power/data conduits left . Seems a shame they couldn't be converted - they weren't fitted that long ago. As the "Oyster" reader is still to be installed - LNR cards cannot be tapped in / out .At least one of the LNR Smartcard readers seems to have disappeared
Seems the Reigate fares span up to Victoria from some brief playing about! Also fares are set to Gatwick (£4.80/£2.60) which should be interesting.Interestingly, Southern have priced Reigate to Redhill at £1.70 peak and £1.50 off-peak, so presumably they are also thinking about the Contactless fare setting. Here, not all fares are set from Reigate.
Why is that interesting? Contactless already goes to Gatwick, just not from Reigate.Also fares are set to Gatwick (£4.80/£2.60) which should be interesting.
Just instigates Reigate even more as their first trial/testing location.Why is that interesting? Contactless already goes to Gatwick, just not from Reigate.