I've just been reading a series of posts in the Disputes & Prosecutions sections and mention has been made about railcards not being valid if the railcard is not signed. The T&C's seam to confirm this, and I've noticed it also re-affirms this on the card itself.
So, what happens in the case of the person being unable to sign the back of the railcard?
My wife has a Disabled Persons railcard, which is valid until August 2016, her condition is such that when the time comes to renew the card she may no longer physically be able to sign the railcard.
I suppose I could sign it on her behalf, but would this be a breach of T&C's? Could we find ourselves in serious trouble if I was to sign it on her behalf?
Since starting to read the Disputes & Prosecutions section, I get paranoid about making a mistake and falling foul of the rules.
So, what happens in the case of the person being unable to sign the back of the railcard?
My wife has a Disabled Persons railcard, which is valid until August 2016, her condition is such that when the time comes to renew the card she may no longer physically be able to sign the railcard.
I suppose I could sign it on her behalf, but would this be a breach of T&C's? Could we find ourselves in serious trouble if I was to sign it on her behalf?
Since starting to read the Disputes & Prosecutions section, I get paranoid about making a mistake and falling foul of the rules.