Why do you contribute then???8 car 377s would JUST fit in at Watford, though that is the only station with that issue. Although, the artical about destination boards is a bit stupid, the could be many reasons why Desiros dont have the same as Electrostars, yet such a small issue managed to get into a magazine that I hope wants to get better? Im sorry but if the magazine hopes to get more readers then little silly things like that is not helping.
Not bad, some nice pictures and articles in there.
However, one thing I noticed on the Christmas Cracker review, there was no mention of the heating failure and half the lights in Coach B were not working.
Plus the running on the outskirts of Portsmouth I wouldn't really term as excellent, more of a stagger, but thats my personal opinion .
Other than that I've no quibbles about it
I agree, maybe reduce the font sizes in places aswell. The larghe fonts look like you didn't have enough to write about.
Some good pics guys. However, as I said for the first issue,
*please please please* put it past the eyes of someone who is certain to get grammar and punctuation 110% correct *before* you publish it?
We are only at issue 3 if you see how far we have come from issue 1 this is only minor.
Especially with rivals such as The Railway Herald and Colin Marsden's photography magazine.If they see multiple spelling, grammer, punctuation mistakes that have been missed out, what are the chances of them reading the next?
Of which 99.99999999% generally is the Dawlish Seawall.Especially with rivals such as The Railway Herald and Colin Marsden's photography magazine.
Of which 99.99999999% generally is the Dawlish Seawall.
Of which 99.99999999% generally is the Dawlish Seawall.
Of which 99.99999999% generally is the Dawlish Seawall.
I meant Colin Marsden's photography one...
matt said:You obviously dont read it then
I meant Colin Marsden's photography one...
I shall repeat what I said before