Scotrail Class 385 Discussion

Discussion in 'Traction & Rolling Stock' started by Clansman, 27 Jan 2016.

  1. anthannan

    anthannan Member

    Messages:
    111
    Joined:
    14 Jul 2018
    Good point.
     
  2. Scotrail314209

    Scotrail314209 Member

    Messages:
    316
    Joined:
    1 Feb 2017
    Would there not be a possibility to put a couple of 385s on peak time Ayrshire diagrams (presumably the double ones) to release the 380s to double up some Gourock and Largs services. 1630 Largs being a culprit for being absolutely rammed.
     
  3. 380gk

    380gk Member

    Messages:
    125
    Joined:
    19 Oct 2014
    Think the 385s are already a bit stretched now, with electrification of the SDA and Edinburgh to Glasgow QS - don’t forget that many of these run in multiple (8 cars all day on the Edinburgh to Queen st route)
     
  4. Scotrail314209

    Scotrail314209 Member

    Messages:
    316
    Joined:
    1 Feb 2017
    You could easily take the 385s off the Cathcart Circle diagrams both during the day and on peak. As they really aren’t suited for that work.

    Has anyone else noticed on an Anti-clockwise Circle the 385 PIS says it is approaching Glasgow Central as it passes Pollokshields East heading in the completely opposite direction?
     
  5. 380gk

    380gk Member

    Messages:
    125
    Joined:
    19 Oct 2014
    I don’t think any Ayr drivers sign 385s, so you can’t swap 380/385s out very easily if the plan is to swap a 380 onto circles and a 385 onto Ayrshire.
     
  6. 380101

    380101 Member

    Messages:
    764
    Joined:
    18 Feb 2015
    That may be changing this year. Have heard from several reliable sources that we are due to get trained on them at some point this year.
     
  7. gsnedders

    gsnedders Established Member

    Messages:
    1,314
    Joined:
    6 Sep 2015
    They're full & standing during the peaks, evening especially. It's not totally unheard of for passengers to fail to board at Queen Street/Central. During the rest of the day a 3-car service would easily suffice (in reality, I think a 1-car service would suffice for much of the day!); especially nowadays most of the services run as 6-car services (to avoid splitting/joining failures around the peaks) it seems fixed formation may well be the approach there.

    Partick and Hyndland are also problematic, and lie on the incredibly congested section, again being post-electrification stations.
     
  8. Scotrail314209

    Scotrail314209 Member

    Messages:
    316
    Joined:
    1 Feb 2017
    3 cars does not suffice at all. Larkhall and Hamilton are very busy with 3 cars.
     
  9. Peter0124

    Peter0124 Member

    Messages:
    513
    Joined:
    20 Nov 2016
    Location:
    Glasgow
    3 cars on weekends on the Argyle line route can be standing room only!
     
  10. DaStripedCgull

    DaStripedCgull Member

    Messages:
    41
    Joined:
    4 Jul 2019
    Apparently the franchise is to end in 2022 meaning there will probably be no extra 385s.
     
  11. snookertam

    snookertam Member

    Messages:
    388
    Joined:
    22 Sep 2018
    2 problems with this though:

    1) As already pointed out, the stations at Argyle Street, Partick, Hyndland and others on the North Clyde and Argyle Line routes are not suited to 23m units - the level of ASDO required wouldn't be suitable without extending the platforms which would likely be prohibitive. The more sensible option would be for any new units on these routes to be 20m so as to avoid what would be ultimately unneccessary alteration works.

    2) Running more frequent (and possibly shorter) trains are far preferable to running fewer trains. A 15 minute frequency will attract more than double the patronage than a 30 minute frequency. People don't want to have to plan part of their day to be at the station for a certain time to catch a train, so they don't miss it. When we are trying to encourage people away from car usage, a 'turn-up-and-go' service of 15 minute (20 min at a push) frequency within the city at least is what is needed as minimum. Obviously this wont work on certain routes due to single line etc, but what can't happen is to use train lengths to decide that we don't need to have more frequent trains - that's the opposite of what should be happening.
     
  12. alangla

    alangla Member

    Messages:
    743
    Joined:
    11 Apr 2018
    Location:
    Glasgow
    On number 1, 5x23m with walkthrough gangways etc might be a more productive use of space than 6x20, I guess it depends on the unit. Agreed that ASDO is unworkable, especially in the city centre

    On number 2, the North Clyde east of Queen Street was every 15 mins all stops for decades, but Abellio recently ended it! It’s now 30 mins all stops (Balloch) 30 mins fast to Garrowhill then all stops (Helensburgh) and 30 mins all stops to Shettleston then Sunnyside & Airdrie (Milngavie). The effect is that many stations now have 20/10 minute gaps and the previous trick of taking a Balloch to Airdrie & crossing to a fast Milngavie to get to Edinburgh no longer works, so the effective frequency from the east end/Coatbridge to Edinburgh has halved from every 15 to every 30 mins. It has, however, evened out a lot of the loadings between Helensburgh and Milngavie trains.
     
  13. RLBH

    RLBH Member

    Messages:
    920
    Joined:
    17 May 2018
    That's as may be - but would require pushing more trains through the Partick-Hyndland section and across the flat junction at Hyndland East. Until a means of reliably doing so can be found, or else a way to terminate trains from the east before they get to Partick, any increase in capacity needs to come from longer trains.
     
  14. Altnabreac

    Altnabreac Established Member

    Messages:
    2,292
    Joined:
    20 Apr 2013
    Location:
    Salt & Vinegar
    Partick platforms can be extended for a not outrageous (though still substantial) cost.

    Hyndland will be getting a full rebuild (probably on a slightly different location) in the next 10 years. Would be criminal if 8 x 23m platforms were not included.

    Argyle Street is a trickier prospect. My controversial suggestion would be to close it entirely. It’s too close to Glasgow Central and the leisure centre of gravity in the city centre has moved eastwards in the last 40 years. I’d replace it with a reopened low level station at Glasgow Cross instead to better serve Merchant City/ Fruitmarket etc.
     
  15. InOban

    InOban Established Member

    Messages:
    2,417
    Joined:
    12 Mar 2017
    Agreed. It was built to serve St. Enoch shopping centre. Reopening the Cross would encourage regeneration of the East End.
    And I'll never understand why they spent £millions on installing lifts at Hyndland without relocating it at the same time (and renaming it Gartnavel)
     
  16. Stopper

    Stopper Member

    Messages:
    627
    Joined:
    11 Nov 2017
    Closing the incredibly busy Argyle Street would be madness if the sole reason was to accommodate 8x23 running on the Argyle line which really isn’t needed.
     
  17. InOban

    InOban Established Member

    Messages:
    2,417
    Joined:
    12 Mar 2017
    So busy that it closes early on Sundays.
    Seriously, this discussion belongs on a different thread.
     
  18. hexagon789

    hexagon789 Established Member

    Messages:
    7,285
    Joined:
    2 Sep 2016
    Location:
    Glasgow
    That was mentioned months ago, but heard nothing since, that 385s would go down Ayrshire way. Unless it's purely training and they won't actually run to Ayrshire?
     
  19. Stopper

    Stopper Member

    Messages:
    627
    Joined:
    11 Nov 2017
    So busy that it’s the 16th busiest station in Scotland with 1.3million passengers a year, yes. What a bizarre post.
     
  20. 380101

    380101 Member

    Messages:
    764
    Joined:
    18 Feb 2015
    It's definately going to happen and been confirmed by various reliable sources within my work. It's just a case of fitting the training in, which is proving difficult due to the high volume of trainee drivers.
     
  21. hexagon789

    hexagon789 Established Member

    Messages:
    7,285
    Joined:
    2 Sep 2016
    Location:
    Glasgow
    Thank you for confirming it, interesting to see which services they will end up on
     
  22. InOban

    InOban Established Member

    Messages:
    2,417
    Joined:
    12 Mar 2017
    I stand corrected. But would they be seriously inconvenienced by relocation? Where are the passengers headi?
     
  23. Stopper

    Stopper Member

    Messages:
    627
    Joined:
    11 Nov 2017
    I doubt the passengers would be greatly inconvenienced by moving the station to Glasgow Cross. However, 1.3million passengers per year use it, so I’m not one to judge for them. It would seem a pretty unnecessary and expensive move just to accommodate 8x23m trains that aren’t needed, though.
     
  24. alangla

    alangla Member

    Messages:
    743
    Joined:
    11 Apr 2018
    Location:
    Glasgow
    Would have thought the through services to Edinburgh and North Berwick would be obvious candidates- it would allow 380s to be eradicated east of Carstairs and end guard operation meaning 385s would be the only type you’d need to train Edinburgh crews and any guards on.
     
  25. SC318250

    SC318250 Member

    Messages:
    512
    Joined:
    4 Jun 2011
    It would make sense for Ayr to Edinburgh services as well as those 380 operated Shotts services.
    380 then on Newton etc
     
  26. route101

    route101 Established Member

    Messages:
    5,569
    Joined:
    16 May 2010
    380 set still on the Shotts?
     
  27. hexagon789

    hexagon789 Established Member

    Messages:
    7,285
    Joined:
    2 Sep 2016
    Location:
    Glasgow
    Yes I think that was suggested previously as it makes sense given the Edinburgh-North Berwicks are primarily 385s.
     
  28. jazza374

    jazza374 Member

    Messages:
    46
    Joined:
    2 Jan 2011
    Location:
    Motherwell
    Yes one 4 car set all day Mon to Fri at least, always on the 17.2x GLC to EDI for the needed capacity.
     
  29. route101

    route101 Established Member

    Messages:
    5,569
    Joined:
    16 May 2010
    I see , i thought they added a 6 car 385 set
     
  30. GLC

    GLC Member

    Messages:
    91
    Joined:
    21 Nov 2018
    Has there been any more work into reworking the Neilston turnback for 6x23m trains?
     

Share This Page