• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

ScotRail HST Introduction - Updates & Discussion

Status
Not open for further replies.

92002

Member
Joined
27 Mar 2014
Messages
1,193
Location
Clydebank
I'm fairly sure that grandfather rights apply to the vehicle, rather than the design, otherwise you'd just keep building vehicles to older designs. Also, you seem fairly sure that making the door opening wider is simple, but after all, bunging diesel engines under 769s or D78s, or even installing the sliding doors into mk3s should have been simple...
Grandfather rights apply to the vehicle, its design and operating on the railway. So a older design is not governed. Y current TSI needs.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

James James

Member
Joined
29 Jan 2018
Messages
426
Are you using engineer in the sense of "person who comes and fixes things" or the "has an engineering degree" sense? Because the latter certainly still seems to plenty of brits in it out in industry, and plenty more in University.
The work being done probably requires neither the former nor the latter - the former would require lots of specific training to do the work required, the latter would require a lot of training in terms of being able to do hands-on work (I would know, I'm one of those with a degree - I'd be nigh on useless in terms of actually doing the mechanical work needed). It requires highly skilled metalworkers/fabricators/etc (who tend to have gone through a few years of vocational training), and the UK doesn't produce many of them.
 

The_Engineer

Member
Joined
24 Mar 2018
Messages
524
The work being done probably requires neither the former nor the latter - the former would require lots of specific training to do the work required, the latter would require a lot of training in terms of being able to do hands-on work (I would know, I'm one of those with a degree - I'd be nigh on useless in terms of actually doing the mechanical work needed). It requires highly skilled metalworkers/fabricators/etc (who tend to have gone through a few years of vocational training), and the UK doesn't produce many of them.
There's no doubt that WABTEC are short of suitably qualified and experienced mechanical fitters and fabricators - there's a great big notice on their factory (visible from the station) advertising for them. From my own experience with power operated train doors they are not easy beasts to fit to a brand new bodyshell. In a 30-40 year old bodyshell you will have many more risk areas to deal with. I do not envy them their task.
 

InOban

Established Member
Joined
12 Mar 2017
Messages
4,397
The work being done probably requires neither the former nor the latter - the former would require lots of specific training to do the work required, the latter would require a lot of training in terms of being able to do hands-on work (I would know, I'm one of those with a degree - I'd be nigh on useless in terms of actually doing the mechanical work needed). It requires highly skilled metalworkers/fabricators/etc (who tend to have gone through a few years of vocational training), and the UK doesn't produce many of them.
I must apologise for using the word engineer without making it clear that I was referring to the skilled master craftsmen (or women) rather than the graduate professionals. It reflects badly on this country that the professional engineer does not have the same status as other professions such as architect. And that the engineering craftspeople are not recognised as fundamental to the real economy. They create long-term value for us all.
 

Highland37

Established Member
Joined
29 Jun 2012
Messages
1,259
Back on topic, We know the programme is behind and there are coaches at Wabtec. Are these the first set of refurbished coaches or ones that show the programme is beyond the initial stages?
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Doomotron

Established Member
Joined
25 Jun 2018
Messages
1,380
Location
Kent
Livery/paint job looks nice. The recessed doors spoil the mk3 look though. You can see they fit awkwardly into the slightly bevelled end shape of the body. I've always thought the original doorss on mk3s are quite a neat design, with the hinge part way round the corner.
I think the GWR and SC HSTs should have had the Chiltern-style doors, I think they'd look much better.
 

jopsuk

Veteran Member
Joined
13 May 2008
Messages
12,773
I think the GWR and SC HSTs should have had the Chiltern-style doors, I think they'd look much better.
They would.

They would also, as has been explained many times, be much, much more expensive and at this point, probably be much further behind schedule.
 

najaB

Veteran Member
Joined
28 Aug 2011
Messages
32,331
Location
Scotland
That would surely depend on the level of effort applied so your point is at the very best hypothetical.
Of course it's hypothetical, but if one design takes 300 hours per coach and the other takes 450 then the latter will take longer - all other things being equal.
 

jingsmonty

Member
Joined
21 Oct 2014
Messages
1,022
Location
Inverness
because clearly there is work in progress, and they would likely be less progress had they used the design used at Chiltern

Exactly - the Chiltern style doors, whilst the do look neater, also took a lot of work as each coach is effectively hand built & every coach is slightly different. In effect, every individual coach requires an individual rebuild for the doors. The Scotrail/GWR door mod is simpler to fit, allowing a standard module to be fitted to each coach.

Wabtec really need to get the finger out & get these coaches sorted out! If the proposal to run 2 sets temporarily with slam door stock is correct, Wabtec should be paying for the staff training costs this will entail!
 

Highlandspring

Established Member
Joined
14 Oct 2017
Messages
2,777
If the proposal to run 2 sets temporarily with slam door stock is correct, Wabtec should be paying for the staff training costs this will entail!

I like how an internet ‘rumour’ has now become a ‘proposal’. Presumably the next stage is to refer to it as a ‘plan’?
 

InOban

Established Member
Joined
12 Mar 2017
Messages
4,397
Just like the 365s started as a rumour? Or bringing up some 153s to strengthen WHL services. - now being officially considered.?
 

scotraildriver

Established Member
Joined
15 Jun 2009
Messages
1,759
The source of this "rumour" is a very credible and high up person in Scotrail. It Will happen if necessary.
 

Rail Blues

Member
Joined
2 Aug 2016
Messages
608
most rumours start from credible sources.

Not really, some do, some don't. Some will be a misunderstanding or a result of Chinese whispers, people putting 2 and 2 together and getting 5 and some may be a result of a sad sack wanting to appear in the know or pretending to be a train driver. I'm not saying that this is what's happened in this case, but the Internet is chock full of guff and this site isn't immune to that.
 

InOban

Established Member
Joined
12 Mar 2017
Messages
4,397
A train left Craigentinny for Wabtec today at 11.30. currently passing through Newcastle. On RTT. Gone to collect the first rake?
 

TheMuttley

Member
Joined
4 Feb 2018
Messages
43
I recently heard that it had been suggested (as above) that Scotrail were planning to run slam-door HST stock, as a temporary measure. However, bizarrely, it was suggested that this would be between Edinburgh and Glasgow Central, which I found somewhat strange, given that they clearly have been running the training HSTs into Queen St, already. Thoughts?
 

jopsuk

Veteran Member
Joined
13 May 2008
Messages
12,773
I recently heard that it had been suggested (as above) that Scotrail were planning to run slam-door HST stock, as a temporary measure. However, bizarrely, it was suggested that this would be between Edinburgh and Glasgow Central, which I found somewhat strange, given that they clearly have been running the training HSTs into Queen St, already. Thoughts?
Thoughts? That someone's deeply confused. There's sufficient EMUs for the route via Motherwell and it would be very odd to use them via Shotts.
 

najaB

Veteran Member
Joined
28 Aug 2011
Messages
32,331
Location
Scotland
Thoughts? That someone's deeply confused. There's sufficient EMUs for the route via Motherwell and it would be very odd to use them via Shotts.
The only reason that someone might propose Central rather than Queen Street is that that someone thinks that there wouldn't be enough room to safely open the doors in the tunnel in the event of an evacuation.

Given that slam-door stock operated into Queen Street previously, this is a pile of...
 

Indigo Soup

Established Member
Joined
17 May 2018
Messages
1,449
Given that slam-door stock operated into Queen Street previously, this is a pile of...
And I believe has done so within the last few months - didn't the Fort William sleeper call at Queen Street High Level recently?
 

marks87

Established Member
Joined
23 Jun 2010
Messages
1,636
Location
Dundee
And I believe has done so within the last few months - didn't the Fort William sleeper call at Queen Street High Level recently?

The Lowland Sleeper left from Queen Street when there was engineering work at/near Central.
 

380101

Member
Joined
18 Feb 2015
Messages
1,067
I recently heard that it had been suggested (as above) that Scotrail were planning to run slam-door HST stock, as a temporary measure. However, bizarrely, it was suggested that this would be between Edinburgh and Glasgow Central, which I found somewhat strange, given that they clearly have been running the training HSTs into Queen St, already. Thoughts?

Potentially could be using them for extra trains during the open. They ran specials last time when it was at Gleneagles.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top