So, in some places, given the amount of rain fall, some flooding was inevitable. But I wonder how much flooding of the railway was due partly or wholly due to lack of maintenance to the railway lineside drainage system.
I know from past experience that it’s not unknown for catch-pits (brick or concrete chambers with metal grills for top covers that drainage pipes connect to) to fill up with either ballast or mud (some of which may then get into the connecting pipes). Hence hindering the flow of water.
Similarly, surface drainage channels also become clogged up with various debris, be it ballast, tree leaves and branches, vegetation, mud or other stuff.
And of course various trees have fallen and caused problems. When were these trees last inspected/examined (if on railway land or near the boundary)?
During the changes in 2011 (known as 2B/C), Network Rail reduced the number of maintenance staff. The RMT union has previously raised the issue of the relevant department (Off-Track) as being under resourced. In some areas, the company did acknowledge this, and said that they would review the situation. And later on, some additional funding and in some cases, some additional posts were created.
However, with Modernising Maintenance that has come in recently, the maintenance budget has been cut and so have the number of maintenance posts. Although it’s far too early to tell if these recent changes have been a contributing factor.
Moderators, if this post is not appropriate to this topic, can you please move it to the appropriate topic.