hexagon789
Veteran Member
We sympathise in spirit!No it's fine... RailForums members have no particular duty to resolve my petty issues with supermarket shopping
We sympathise in spirit!No it's fine... RailForums members have no particular duty to resolve my petty issues with supermarket shopping
but the amount of food disposed of is very small these days
Don't you believe that, that's all I'll say!
(I have personal experience - it's not 'very small')
You are incorrect, though it does vary by chain, and even by store.
Mushrooms as something else - and I'm not giving any secrets away there. Local cafe owner caught doing it by the carrier bag full on a frequent basis. A friend whose stock control said he had too many mushrooms but there were none on the shelves, and the opposite problem of selling more of the alternative than had been delivered. 'I no speak English' says the cafe owner, no problem said the produce manager who simply printed off the banning letter in the apporpriate language - it already having been translated by head office.Are there any significant losses from shoppers mis-using the weighing scales in the grocery section? I've often wondered, and I am not advocating this, but what is there to stop you weighing expensive fruit such as raspberries, but selecting a cheaper fruit to produce the bar code and price label? The checkout scales will check that the weight is correct, but have no way of knowing whether the goods are correct.
Don't you believe that, that's all I'll say!
(I have personal experience - it's not 'very small')
I am very aware of wastage and disposal figures in supermarkets. Of course it will vary by store but it also has to be seen in the overall context of sales of around £140 billion per year.You are incorrect, though it does vary by chain, and even by store.
Food doesn't go to landfill these days. It generally goes to food banks or local charities.It also depends on what you consider “disposed of” to mean. Most supermarkets use food charities for disposal of short life stock from warehouses, and most stores have arrangements with local charities.
The proportion of stock which isn’t sold at full ticket price also varies - the shorter the date life at manufacture the higher it is, and also it’s more in smaller convenience stores than big superstores.
As ever, it's a balancing act between the overall customer experience and minimising loss.
Lots of different factors to consider:I find the variation in pricing of “reduced to clear” interesting. I have a friend who shops in her local Tesco and can often pick up piles of stuff marked down to 10p. Whereas I find the reduced shelf in my store is usually more like 10-20% off, a lucky bargain might be half price. Presumably my store is slightly better at keeping its excess stock down so they don’t need to discount so much?
Very goodSurely anything involving self service tills with scales is a balancing act
In addition to Hadders point, there's also the time of day.I find the variation in pricing of “reduced to clear” interesting. I have a friend who shops in her local Tesco and can often pick up piles of stuff marked down to 10p. Whereas I find the reduced shelf in my store is usually more like 10-20% off, a lucky bargain might be half price. Presumably my store is slightly better at keeping its excess stock down so they don’t need to discount so much?
Even taking charity donations into account, which vary by supermarket, the amount of food waste which is simply 'wasted' is in my opinion still pretty shocking.It also depends on what you consider “disposed of” to mean. Most supermarkets use food charities for disposal of short life stock from warehouses, and most stores have arrangements with local charities.
The proportion of stock which isn’t sold at full ticket price also varies - the shorter the date life at manufacture the higher it is, and also it’s more in smaller convenience stores than big superstores.
I appreciate that, but it's still worth a not inconsiderable amount of £££I am very aware of wastage and disposal figures in supermarkets. Of course it will vary by store but it also has to be seen in the overall context of sales of around £140 billion per year.
Obviously it varies by supermarket in terms of times and % reduction, but many use a system where the price is affected by quantity and expected sales of item - a less well-selling product and say 30 of that product will be marked down more heavily than a single item of a fast-selling product line.I find the variation in pricing of “reduced to clear” interesting. I have a friend who shops in her local Tesco and can often pick up piles of stuff marked down to 10p. Whereas I find the reduced shelf in my store is usually more like 10-20% off, a lucky bargain might be half price. Presumably my store is slightly better at keeping its excess stock down so they don’t need to discount so much?
Occasionally? In my experience it requires staff intervention on most of transactions; the likelihood of intervention increasing proportionately to the number of goods Im trying to purchase.Moderator note - posts #1 - #13 originally in this thread:
How critical is the return of passengers and busy trains for railway jobs? | RailUK Forums (railforums.co.uk)
but in the supermarket, one staff member can manage 10 self scan tills. the customers do most of the work, only needing staff input occasionally. far more productive.
I find that even if you put a normal shopping bag on the scales, or select the using my own bag option (where available) it still insists on human verification, so I don’t bother, and scan all my items, pay, and then pack them into bags at the end.The biggest problem I encounter with the self-service machines is that I generally don't want to put my shopping in a carrier bag; I want to put it in my rucksack. Unfortunately a rucksack is often heavy enough that if I place it on the scales the machine refuses to believe it's just a bag and a member of staff has to verify it.
I assume the aim of this is to make sure people can't hide things in a rucksack and just buy a small nominal item to make it look like I was a genuine customer to the staff.
I don't quite see the point of this; if I really wanted to steal the merchandise (which, for the record, I don't) I could surely just keep the rucksack on my back and use a carrier bag for my nominal item, and the computer would be none the wiser?
My preferred option when doing medium - large shops is to use the "scan as you go" devices. Not only does this save time as I can pack my bags as I go meaning it can take less than a minute at the till itself (assuming no security check). Helps if the store is large enough to get it's own tills set aside for scan as you go customers rather than making them join the queue for the normal self scan.
Also has the benefit of seeing the price of the goods matches the shelf edge label, especially if it's an item on promotion.
Yes, that's being gradually rolled out by I think all of the major British chains of large supermarkets. It looks like a good idea though I've never personally used it as they require having a loyalty card for the relevant supermarket.I really dislike those self service tills with scales. They only give trouble and in my experience nearly always require staff. I’m glad they don’t exist where I live.
I always use the app of the supermarket in which you can put your shopping list and then scan all products with your phone and directly put them into the bags. At the end, I can just show a code on my phone screen to the self service till and I can pay everything. Very quick and only a handful of times, staff checks a few items in the bags.
I wouldn't be surprised if they don't replace those at the end of life, given that they've now shown it can work on smartphones. The benefit would be negligible, and I'd suspect the union of customers not having a smartphone and those wishing to use self-scan-as-you-go is pretty small.In addition, Sainsburys, Tesco and Asda have handsets in some of their larger stores which customers can pick up (Waitrose have had these for ages) if they prefer not to use a smartphone.
Interestingly a lot of them have come in quite recently! Though I do agree that they probably won't be kept far into the future.I wouldn't be surprised if they don't replace those at the end of life, given that they've now shown it can work on smartphones. The benefit would be negligible, and I'd suspect the union of customers not having a smartphone and those wishing to use self-scan-as-you-go is pretty small.
The fruit/veg section generally has a machine where you place your bag of produce on a scale and select which type of produce you are weighing. The machine then prints a barcode which you scan with the device.Not used them, but how do you weigh (and so price up) loose produce using a handheld self scan device?
The union would be large, the intersection would be small.I wouldn't be surprised if they don't replace those at the end of life, given that they've now shown it can work on smartphones. The benefit would be negligible, and I'd suspect the union of customers not having a smartphone and those wishing to use self-scan-as-you-go is pretty small.
Indeed. I gave up studying maths for a reason… (Or maybe my giving it up is the reason for that mistake.)The union would be large, the intersection would be small.
When the self-scan tills appeared I found that there were a lot of errors, seemingly always in the supermarket’s favour. In one chain offers such as ‘Two-for-One’ did not seem to get put into the system when they came into force and the items would go through at full price. And this could be well into the afternoon of the first day or even on another day.
Aye, that'll be right, for sure!Errors in the supermarket's favour will always register on your concious more than errors in your favour which i'm sure there are; I think it's more or less net zero over time.
I am aware of the greater likelihood of remembering when you feel you have been cheated, rather than when you win. However, I was watching carefully after I had first become suspicious. Unless the machine miscalculates the total or gives you more change, it is difficult for an error to be in your favour. What are the chances of buying two of something that the system wrongly thinks is a BOGOF?Errors in the supermarket's favour will always register on your concious more than errors in your favour which i'm sure there are; I think it's more or less net zero over time.
Processing of multi-buy / meal-deals / BOGOF can only be applied once all items have been scanned and you proceed to payment in order to work out the most optimal application of the offers in your favour.
And I did soon get to know that the tills in most of the chains only took off the reductions when you went to payment. This was always the attendants first explanation and I soon learnt that I had to take it into account.
At least once, and quite recently too.I am aware of the greater likelihood of remembering when you feel you have been cheated, rather than when you win. However, I was watching carefully after I had first become suspicious. Unless the machine miscalculates the total or gives you more change, it is difficult for an error to be in your favour. What are the chances of buying two of something that the system wrongly thinks is a BOGOF?
And I did soon get to know that the tills in most of the chains only took off the reductions when you went to payment. This was always the attendants first explanation and I soon learnt that I had to take it into account.
The fruit/veg section generally has a machine where you place your bag of produce on a scale and select which type of produce you are weighing. The machine then prints a barcode which you scan with the device.
I find that even if you put a normal shopping bag on the scales, or select the using my own bag option (where available) it still insists on human verification, so I don’t bother, and scan all my items, pay, and then pack them into bags at the end.
What are the chances of buying two of something that the system wrongly thinks is a BOGOF?
Somewhat surprises me that the machine prints the barcode rather than simply displaying it for you to scan.
Depends what technology the handheld machines have; some [laser] scanners are unable to read barcodes displayed on screens (some supermarkets like Sainsbury’s for instance have only recently upgraded their semi-attended terminals as previously they wouldn’t accept nectar cards off mobile phones and you had to type the number in manually).Somewhat surprises me that the machine prints the barcode rather than simply displaying it for you to scan. Must add quite a bit to the cost and complexity of the machine, and it seems a complete waste of a sticky label - since I have no use for the label after scanning it, and end up throwing them away as soon as I get home.